Social Feed

L
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
It's interesting to see that Dish with its XiP receivers is only now catching up to the system I have for over a year and a half now. I bet however that the Dish only solution will be cheaper initially but more per month.

History:
A little less than 2 years ago I was looking for a whole house PVR solution that would allow me to integrate OTA/FTA/D* or E* and an occasional DVD playback on 4 HDTVs. At that time, neither D* nor E* had a solution. So was forced to settle with a DVBLogic/Win7 solution - the only solution available at that time.

The setup:
The main PVR machine is simply a mid-grade PC with Windows 7 Home Premium on it running the build-in MediaCenter (Win7 home premium or higher is required for MediaCenter functionality). It has a dual OTA internal tuner (AVerMedia AVerTVHD Duet), a dual FTA internal tuner (TBS 6980), and two Hauppauge HD PVRs connected to two Dish 211k receivers. This is connected to the main HDTV. The other 3 HDTVs have XBox 360s connected to them and setup as MCE extenders. DVBLogic DVBLink virtual tuners are used to integrate FTA (via DVBLogic TVSource) and 211k/HD PVRs (via 1geek1tool HDPVR software) into the 4 satellite tuner slots of MediaCenter.





The advantages of such a setup:
  • Single PVR solution for the full house
  • Up to 4 OTA and 4 Sat tuners at the same time
  • Able to play a DVD at any TV
  • Up to 6 HDTVs (1 PC + 5 XBox 360 extenders)
  • Able to play videos off of a hard drive
  • Able to stream free MMS Internet feeds to any TV. Some MMS feeds duplicate pay content on dish. So I don't have to pay for France24 channel for example as I get it via MMS feed
  • Low monthly fees from Dish - standard service + 1 extra 211k receiver
  • "Virtually" unlimited storage due to PC capability
  • NetFlix integration
The disadvantages:
  • High initial hardware & software cost
  • Slight loss of PQ due to re-encoding of the 1080i component output via HD PVRs
  • IR control of the 211k not 100% reliable, HD PVRs not fully stable. I loose an occasional PVR event due to those (about 1 event every 2 months).
  • Uses the analog loophole - unknown how long this will last.
  • Internet TV feeds are limited only to MMS and cannot be time shifted.
  • NetFlix on the MediaCenter is built-in, but on the XBox requires XBox gold subscription
Overall I'm quite happy with the setup. I don't think I will be switching to XiP any time soon.
12 Replies · 3830 views
mfoster711
I don't get it, how do you watch live TV on all the remote TV's?
mike123abc
I don't get it, how do you watch live TV on all the remote TV's?

The Hauppage HD DVR takes the component output of a 211 and makes a stream over the USB connection of the server. The server can then send that stream out to any TV.

It definitely is not as clean of a solution as what the XiP promises, but one never know what one will get with Dish until the box ships.
mfoster711
The Hauppage HD DVR takes the component output of a 211 and makes a stream over the USB connection of the server. The server can then send that stream out to any TV.

It definitely is not as clean of a solution as what the XiP promises, but one never know what one will get with Dish until the box ships.
So can I bring up the Dish program guide on remote TV's and pick a program? How would you control these remote TV's when watching live TV?
L
So can I bring up the Dish program guide on remote TV's and pick a program? How would you control these remote TV's when watching live TV?
You use the MediaCenter guide that aggregates OTA/FTA/Dish programming into a single guide provided by zap2it. The Dish receivers are never used for guide info, only for providing content so there is no issue there.
lakebum431
Cool and unusual setup. I applaud you for figuring out how to get what you want! From a practical standpoint there aren't many people who are going to go to this much trouble. Plus, I'm sure there is quite a learning curve for a new user. @ MikeD lets just wait and see what the fees will be before we get upset about them ;)
MikeD-C05
Cool and unusual setup. I applaud you for figuring out how to get what you want! From a practical standpoint there aren't many people who are going to go to this much trouble. Plus, I'm sure there is quite a learning curve for a new user. @ MikeD lets just wait and see what the fees will be before we get upset about them ;)


Just reacting to DISH's recent History in the last 10 years. DISH once boasted in their advertisments that they offered Tapeless recording for FREE , NO FEES! Then it was $5.00 dvr fee , then it was $6.00 PER DVR receiver. Then we moved to the new additional Receiver fees that conceal many of the made up "just because we can " charge it fees in to one additional receiver fee + one whole house dvr fee. Then the 922 which is still charging an extra $4.00 more than the other dvrs , so it stands to reason the 813 will have the same dvr fee ,since it has the same software, menus, guides and tiles. Now there will be another opportunity to create another new FEE! Charlie has" never liked leaving money on the table ", as he puts it. SO I can only deduce from this statement there will be another new fee . The question is how much this time?
B
Great information. I was planning to use Windows 7 with some combination of Hauppauge PVRs, but was looking for a better solution than XBOX for the Media Center extenders. One would think Google TV would have extender capabilities built in, but that would be too easy.

Couple questions for anyone out there with the knowledge:
1. What is the best option for a Media Center Extender (MCE)?
2. Does Google TV add any value to a PC based system? It can supposedly access media on a PC and play Netflix.
L
I think the xbox pretty much killed the extenders market. For the same price as an extender you get not only an extender, but an upscalling DVD player and a gaming console in one unit. What don't you like about the xbox as an extender?
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 0 views
meStevo
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
Schedule drops tomorrow. Mandatory mini camps in June. Hall of Fame game August 6th.
128 Replies · 2388 views
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo and dfergie
rvvaquero
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.
Y
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.
  • Like
Reactions: AZ. and b4pjoe
b4pjoe
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.
Jerry made himself General Manager after he bought the team but make no mistake Jimmy engineered that trade. As well as a lot of others at the time.
rvvaquero
Jimmy Johnson is a football guy. Jerry Jones is a marketer (hustler).

When I see a football player get a 15 yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct (like taunting) in a close game, I often wonder what he was thinking. Was he thinking, I'm doing everything I can to make this a better team and help win a championship? Or, was he saying to himself, I want everyone to notice how great I am?

Johnson inspires one, Jones the other.
meStevo
Got to unfurl and hold the flag at Allegiant for the anthem today - amazing experience.
HipKat
Balls
Bears. Gave the Pats a good beatdown.
Bucs. Got Baker back and absolutely demolished the previously surprising Panthers.
Falcons. Took care of the 49ers and did so convincingly.
Vikings. I hate them. I do. I've never seen such a bad/good team. Know what I mean? I know their D is epic. But their O is insulting. How they remain undefeated is a mystery.
Rams. Finally looked the part. Mind you against the hapless Cards.
Cowboys. Fireworks performance from their O.
Dolphins. Finally logged in a W. There won't be many. Enjoy it, Miami fans.
Browns. Still atop the AFC North.
Giants. Epic OT win with Buffalo's very own Motor Singletary finishing it off.
Seattle. Dominated KC from start to finish.

Goats
Jets. Couldn't beat the winless Dolphins. Aaron Glenn is a dead man walking.
Eagles. Injured beyond repair
Ravens and Lamar. Has he ever played a full season? Honestly, dude is fragile. Of course he's back for the Bills game.
49ers. No longer undefeated.
Colts. A sh*t show. When are they gonna realize that Daniel Jones is ass?
Steelers vs Saints game. Ass, just ass all around. Those poor people in Paris have had enough lately, and on top of that, endure that game.
Chiefs. They looked terrible. Like really bad.
Pack vs. Detroit game refs. Some of the worst refereeing I've seen in a long time. And the sample is pretty large.
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68634 Replies · 2679088 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
gms49ers
Dancing Days - Led Zeppelin
dishstaller
Dancing in the Street - Van Halen
long_time_Dish
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
  • Like
Reactions: gms49ers
Bobby
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
Let me fix that for you:
Baker Street - Gerry Rafferty
EatMyVolts
The 59th Street Bridge Song -- Simon & Garfunkel
M
Last reply · posted in Over the Air Television By RabbitEars.Info
Interesting article about the work being done to develope an ATSC 3 converter box. Yes it does mention affordable.
10 Replies · 544 views
primestar31
DEATH TO NEXGEN!
star trek GIF


It's dead, they just don't know it yet. They killed it by forcing DRM on it, and that TOTALLY botched implementing it.

There is absolutely NO compelling reason for anybody to switch to ATSC3.0. They only want it as a total and complete money grab.
navychop
I truly hope you are right.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
Mister B
What bothers me is the total waste of broadcasting spectrum in this very crowded market. It has been almost three years now since KFOX converted their broadcast tower to ATSC 3.0 and moved all of their channels to other towers causing noticeable degradation of the picture quality.
I have a Sony TV with 3.0 capabilities but still use the 1.0 version of locals due to the fact that one or all of the 3.0 channels are often missing or unwatchable. In this city of 800K I doubt that more than a few hundred even know about ATSC 3.0.
The only thing that could motivate me to be interested in 3.0 would be if all of the minor networks (diginets) could be in at least 720P rather than blurry ultra-compressed 480i.
Three years is long enough to waste one of the few available RF frequencies in the area for this trial.
It is time to either move on with this experiment or call it quits.
navychop
In this city of 800K I doubt that more than a few hundred even know about ATSC 3.0.

They might notice the hand going into their pocket for their wallet.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
navychop
It is time to either move on with this experiment or call it quits.

QFT. Of course, my preference involves a curb and some kicking.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
S
star trek GIF


It's dead, they just don't know it yet. They killed it by forcing DRM on it, and that TOTALLY botched implementing it.

There is absolutely NO compelling reason for anybody to switch to ATSC3.0. They only want it as a total and complete money grab.
WHAT ABOUT THE INTERNET PART OF IT. NO ONE WANTS A BOX CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET EITHER.
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Local Radio Discussion
21 Replies · 602 views
dishdude
It's probably been 2 decades since I've listened to an AM radio station. Very rarely listen to FM any more.
  • Like
Reactions: reubenray and Jimbo
Jimbo
I am 1 that wants the AM to Stay ....
That said, since '08 I have had Sat radio available to me ... I think I have turned on AM 3 or 4 times, just to see if its still there.

Fwiw, if theres a Major disaster or bad weather or whatever, the chances of me finding out about it by going to the AM side of the radio is SLIM and None.
Even FM, I haven't really had on since '13ish, I may turn it on from time to time, just to see if its still there.
harshness
Fwiw, if theres a Major disaster or bad weather or whatever, the chances of me finding out about it by going to the AM side of the radio is SLIM and None.
Automation has seen to that. You can't get evening drive traffic reports where I live, much less disaster reports.
dishstaller
Very rarely listen to FM any more
That goes for a lot of people. I've been advertising on radio for more than a decade now and am very familiar with this subject. While it is still a valuable tool, it has far less impact than it did just a few years ago. The best reaction I get is from a local Country music station....they play a mix of older and newer music and have a very big footprint.
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony
Jimbo
That goes for a lot of people. I've been advertising on radio for more than a decade now and am very familiar with this subject. While it is still a valuable tool, it has far less impact than it did just a few years ago. The best reaction I get is from a local Country music station....they play a mix of older and newer music and have a very big footprint.
Do you do any Ad's on Satellite ?

If Not, why not, because it's not Local ?
dishstaller
Do you do any Ad's on Satellite ?

If Not, why not, because it's not Local ?
No, just regular FM stations. One is the country station I mentioned and the other is a Talk Radio station which used to get fantastic results but honestly, since the death of Rush Limbaugh, talk radio just doesn't do as well. There were two guys who had an early morning show which was hugely popular here in the southeast but one of them retired a couple years ago and the show just doesn't garner the same numbers as it used to.
S
Haven't listened AM or FM in years
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 8 views
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
1 Replies · 12 views
Bobby
Rest in peace.
JSheridan
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I know HipKat said that they were working on conversions but we got the official news yesterday right from Dish that starting next month all DMA's will be on the western arc, and all customers will be assigned to that. That's gonna mean a lot of customers around here aren't gonna get Dish unless there are exceptions. Too many mountains and trees.
173 Replies · 4944 views
S
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Jimbo
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Mister B
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
S
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
can't forget the little blue m&m's
charlesrshell
can't forget the little blue m&m's
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
T
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Foxbat
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
Because he didn't have a fleet of reusable rockets. Starlink works because SpaceX is able to launch hundreds (thousands?) of their Starlink satellites for what a single geostationary Internet satellite costs to build and launch on a disposable launcher.
T
But how is it reusable if it's disposable
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
My gf is 29 years younger than me :shh
Almighty1
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
He does not have the resources aka $$$ compared to Elon Musk as in reality, Elon can eat Charlie for lunch or even mop the floor with Charlie if he wanted to.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
ment to 20 yrs dam phone
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Marques Brownlee
· posted in Marques Brownlee
0 Replies · 5 views