The two ppv's I had complained about were both girl-on-girl. There was supposed to be some eating at the Y-MCA, according to the description, but there was not any.
A video that has a description of content that never took place is a valid complaint. How would you like to rent a movie that had gore and chainsaws on the cover, but ended up being a chick-flick?
I SERIOUSLY do not understand the 190's setup AT ALL.
If they can show women, full frontal, upclose, touching themselves, they have pretty much gone past any kind of MPAA rating. Why they won't show insertion is beyond me.
Lesson learned, albeit a expensive one. Just like those movies that say "uncut and uncensored", with a girl on the cover with her fingers hooked on her underwear like she is about ready to remove them, but they don't show anything, they just say that because they are too cheap to get a rating, an think people will pay more for them. A lot of national lampoon's movies are a prime example.
I'm a pretty reasonable person, but if I pay for something that I didn't get, I'm going to have it resolved.