Social Feed

G
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I've got three HDTVs in my house. I was thinking of going to hopper from the 722 and the 6xx I have. I am assuming dish is going to charge for install and all that. Will i also lose my package I have now? Or do i get to keep that.
22 Replies · 5382 views
K
KAB said:
Equipment (Hopper, 622, etc) have no affect on your programming, if that's what you are asking. Hoppers (each) and up to three Joeys are now $50.00. Installation is usually $95 unless you have the DHPP. You should contact a DIRT member for exact costs.

I have been with Dish 12 years after 5 with Directv and called Directv to see what deals I could get after Dish told me $50 for a hopper and $30 for OTA. I was surprised how nice the DTV CSR was and how helpful. They put a nice del together that even in months 13-24 would be $4 more than Dish, but for a better package. I called Dish and said I want to stay, but need some incentive. Best they would do is free hopper and $10 credit for 6 months. I told them the DTV is a better deal and they were kind of oblivious, not to mention even their loyalty person was not super friendly nor very knowledgable. I'm torn, I have a 622 today and would like something with more recording capacity and capabilities, so hopper or genie both are attractive. These companies don't get what it is like to retain customers when they offer better deals to new customers, it is like a a slap in the face, thanks for being with us 12 years, but a new customer is more valuable than retaining you.
Slaylock
I have a Hopper installation scheduled for this Friday. This is my current configuration:

  • A 722K that services our family room TV via HDMI and a small TV in the kitchen via coax.
  • A 722 that services the basement and den via an HDMI splitter and a bedroom via coax.
  • Both receivers are set to single mode since we do not generally need to watch different programming on the TVs each receiver services.

This is the configuration I'm considering:

  • A Hopper for the family room TV via HDMI and the kitchen TV via coax.
  • A Joey for the basement and den via an HDMI splitter.
  • A Joey for the bedroom.

But I have a couple of questions:

  • Can the Hopper output via coax or am I going to have to install a Joey on the kitchen TV that currently receives its signal via coax?
  • What would be the monthly billing amount for a Hopper and two Joeys compared to my current 722K and 722 bill?

Thanks
lucky86
I have a Hopper installation scheduled for this Friday. This is my current configuration:


[*]A 722K that services our family room TV via HDMI and a small TV in the kitchen via coax.
[*]A 722 that services the basement and den via an HDMI splitter and a bedroom via coax.
[*]Both receivers are set to single mode since we do not generally need to watch different programming on the TVs each receiver services.


This is the configuration I'm considering:


[*]A Hopper for the family room TV via HDMI and the kitchen TV via coax.
[*]A Joey for the basement and den via an HDMI splitter.
[*]A Joey for the bedroom.


But I have a couple of questions:


[*]Can the Hopper output via coax or am I going to have to install a Joey on the kitchen TV that currently receives its signal via coax?
[*]What would be the monthly billing amount for a Hopper and two Joeys compared to my current 722K and 722 bill?


Thanks

No it does not output via coax
jrbdmb
I'd like to add 2 upstairs DVRs ... currently have a 722 in the family room and one 211 w/ external hard drive. I could either swap the 722 for a Hopper and add two Joeys, OR just add two more 211s w/ external drive on each. It seems like the two 211s might be an easier install and perhaps cheaper, as running coax from the family room to upstairs could be a pain.

Also, will there be any issue running 4 lines from my dish to the receivers if I go with the separate 221s?

Is there anything I am missing that should push me towards a Hopper / Joey solution?

(Edit - I haven't been on here much recently, still trying to get up to speed on the Hopper / Joey thing.)
harshness
I'm torn, I have a 622 today and would like something with more recording capacity and capabilities, so hopper or genie both are attractive.
Did I misread your post? DISH offered you a pretty good deal on an upgrade and you don't see it as such?

DIRECTV is willing to pony up around $800 dollars (Q2 2012 SAC was $789, Q1 2012 SAC was $816) to find your wallet because they're pretty sure they'll wring most of it out of you during the first 24 months. They don't give deals because they are nice.

When you're doing your cost comparisons, don't forget that DIRECTV charges about the same for their OTA tuner.
harshness
It seems like the two 211s might be an easier install and perhaps cheaper, as running coax from the family room to upstairs could be a pain.
How does choosing a ViP211 over some other solution get around installing coax?

Typically, the cost of installation doesn't depend on how difficult it is (unless you demand something above and beyond what is necessary).
jrbdmb
I was expecting it to be easier to drop two cables from the attic into the bedrooms than to fish cable through a bunch of finished walls to get from the family room to the bedroom.

And as for cost, the last time Dish installers came calling any running cables through an inside wall was an upcharge. Have things changed since then?
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 3 views
meStevo
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
Schedule drops tomorrow. Mandatory mini camps in June. Hall of Fame game August 6th.
128 Replies · 2391 views
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo and dfergie
rvvaquero
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.
Y
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.
  • Like
Reactions: AZ. and b4pjoe
b4pjoe
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.
Jerry made himself General Manager after he bought the team but make no mistake Jimmy engineered that trade. As well as a lot of others at the time.
rvvaquero
Jimmy Johnson is a football guy. Jerry Jones is a marketer (hustler).

When I see a football player get a 15 yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct (like taunting) in a close game, I often wonder what he was thinking. Was he thinking, I'm doing everything I can to make this a better team and help win a championship? Or, was he saying to himself, I want everyone to notice how great I am?

Johnson inspires one, Jones the other.
meStevo
Got to unfurl and hold the flag at Allegiant for the anthem today - amazing experience.
HipKat
Balls
Bears. Gave the Pats a good beatdown.
Bucs. Got Baker back and absolutely demolished the previously surprising Panthers.
Falcons. Took care of the 49ers and did so convincingly.
Vikings. I hate them. I do. I've never seen such a bad/good team. Know what I mean? I know their D is epic. But their O is insulting. How they remain undefeated is a mystery.
Rams. Finally looked the part. Mind you against the hapless Cards.
Cowboys. Fireworks performance from their O.
Dolphins. Finally logged in a W. There won't be many. Enjoy it, Miami fans.
Browns. Still atop the AFC North.
Giants. Epic OT win with Buffalo's very own Motor Singletary finishing it off.
Seattle. Dominated KC from start to finish.

Goats
Jets. Couldn't beat the winless Dolphins. Aaron Glenn is a dead man walking.
Eagles. Injured beyond repair
Ravens and Lamar. Has he ever played a full season? Honestly, dude is fragile. Of course he's back for the Bills game.
49ers. No longer undefeated.
Colts. A sh*t show. When are they gonna realize that Daniel Jones is ass?
Steelers vs Saints game. Ass, just ass all around. Those poor people in Paris have had enough lately, and on top of that, endure that game.
Chiefs. They looked terrible. Like really bad.
Pack vs. Detroit game refs. Some of the worst refereeing I've seen in a long time. And the sample is pretty large.
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68634 Replies · 2679111 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
gms49ers
Dancing Days - Led Zeppelin
dishstaller
Dancing in the Street - Van Halen
long_time_Dish
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
  • Like
Reactions: gms49ers
Bobby
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
Let me fix that for you:
Baker Street - Gerry Rafferty
EatMyVolts
The 59th Street Bridge Song -- Simon & Garfunkel
M
Last reply · posted in Over the Air Television By RabbitEars.Info
Interesting article about the work being done to develope an ATSC 3 converter box. Yes it does mention affordable.
10 Replies · 548 views
primestar31
DEATH TO NEXGEN!
star trek GIF


It's dead, they just don't know it yet. They killed it by forcing DRM on it, and that TOTALLY botched implementing it.

There is absolutely NO compelling reason for anybody to switch to ATSC3.0. They only want it as a total and complete money grab.
navychop
I truly hope you are right.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
Mister B
What bothers me is the total waste of broadcasting spectrum in this very crowded market. It has been almost three years now since KFOX converted their broadcast tower to ATSC 3.0 and moved all of their channels to other towers causing noticeable degradation of the picture quality.
I have a Sony TV with 3.0 capabilities but still use the 1.0 version of locals due to the fact that one or all of the 3.0 channels are often missing or unwatchable. In this city of 800K I doubt that more than a few hundred even know about ATSC 3.0.
The only thing that could motivate me to be interested in 3.0 would be if all of the minor networks (diginets) could be in at least 720P rather than blurry ultra-compressed 480i.
Three years is long enough to waste one of the few available RF frequencies in the area for this trial.
It is time to either move on with this experiment or call it quits.
navychop
In this city of 800K I doubt that more than a few hundred even know about ATSC 3.0.

They might notice the hand going into their pocket for their wallet.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
navychop
It is time to either move on with this experiment or call it quits.

QFT. Of course, my preference involves a curb and some kicking.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
S
star trek GIF


It's dead, they just don't know it yet. They killed it by forcing DRM on it, and that TOTALLY botched implementing it.

There is absolutely NO compelling reason for anybody to switch to ATSC3.0. They only want it as a total and complete money grab.
WHAT ABOUT THE INTERNET PART OF IT. NO ONE WANTS A BOX CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET EITHER.
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Local Radio Discussion
21 Replies · 604 views
dishdude
It's probably been 2 decades since I've listened to an AM radio station. Very rarely listen to FM any more.
  • Like
Reactions: reubenray and Jimbo
Jimbo
I am 1 that wants the AM to Stay ....
That said, since '08 I have had Sat radio available to me ... I think I have turned on AM 3 or 4 times, just to see if its still there.

Fwiw, if theres a Major disaster or bad weather or whatever, the chances of me finding out about it by going to the AM side of the radio is SLIM and None.
Even FM, I haven't really had on since '13ish, I may turn it on from time to time, just to see if its still there.
harshness
Fwiw, if theres a Major disaster or bad weather or whatever, the chances of me finding out about it by going to the AM side of the radio is SLIM and None.
Automation has seen to that. You can't get evening drive traffic reports where I live, much less disaster reports.
dishstaller
Very rarely listen to FM any more
That goes for a lot of people. I've been advertising on radio for more than a decade now and am very familiar with this subject. While it is still a valuable tool, it has far less impact than it did just a few years ago. The best reaction I get is from a local Country music station....they play a mix of older and newer music and have a very big footprint.
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony
Jimbo
That goes for a lot of people. I've been advertising on radio for more than a decade now and am very familiar with this subject. While it is still a valuable tool, it has far less impact than it did just a few years ago. The best reaction I get is from a local Country music station....they play a mix of older and newer music and have a very big footprint.
Do you do any Ad's on Satellite ?

If Not, why not, because it's not Local ?
dishstaller
Do you do any Ad's on Satellite ?

If Not, why not, because it's not Local ?
No, just regular FM stations. One is the country station I mentioned and the other is a Talk Radio station which used to get fantastic results but honestly, since the death of Rush Limbaugh, talk radio just doesn't do as well. There were two guys who had an early morning show which was hugely popular here in the southeast but one of them retired a couple years ago and the show just doesn't garner the same numbers as it used to.
S
Haven't listened AM or FM in years
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 8 views
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
1 Replies · 14 views
Bobby
Rest in peace.
JSheridan
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I know HipKat said that they were working on conversions but we got the official news yesterday right from Dish that starting next month all DMA's will be on the western arc, and all customers will be assigned to that. That's gonna mean a lot of customers around here aren't gonna get Dish unless there are exceptions. Too many mountains and trees.
173 Replies · 4954 views
S
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Jimbo
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Mister B
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
S
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
can't forget the little blue m&m's
charlesrshell
can't forget the little blue m&m's
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
T
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Foxbat
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
Because he didn't have a fleet of reusable rockets. Starlink works because SpaceX is able to launch hundreds (thousands?) of their Starlink satellites for what a single geostationary Internet satellite costs to build and launch on a disposable launcher.
T
But how is it reusable if it's disposable
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
My gf is 29 years younger than me :shh
Almighty1
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
He does not have the resources aka $$$ compared to Elon Musk as in reality, Elon can eat Charlie for lunch or even mop the floor with Charlie if he wanted to.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
ment to 20 yrs dam phone
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Marques Brownlee
· posted in Marques Brownlee
0 Replies · 6 views