Umm, local broadcasters are MANDATED BY LAW to consider "public interest" because thsoe frequencies are owned by "We the People" and were provided to the broadcasters as a FREE LUNCH, DINNER, and smorgasboard without even a penney retrunred to the taxpayer, who also funded many of the broadcasters cost to transition to HD. MVPD's have no such "public" mandate, AND, in the case of cable, negotiated a franchise with local governmet and agreeing to a number of conditions, in some cases including MONEY, in exchange to operate a Cable TV service in a service area. In the case of satellite, they paid for the frequencies they use in an auction with all the money going to all of us by way of our government.
So, let's set-up an auction to all and any who wish to bid for the local OTA frequencies across the country and after "We the People" are paid for those frequencies, then the broadcasters can start morally charging re-transmission fees and we could release them from any "public mandate." It is just plain WRONG that anyone has to pay for signals and the content on them when those frequencies belong to all of us. Or how about allowing local broadcasters to charge subscribers directly, then the broadcasters can get their money (to which they are not morally entitled), and the rest of us don't have to subsidize it in other charges in our bills. But I don't think you would like any of those ideas because they represent fairness in access to local stations outside of OTA.
And FWIW, you really think Les Monves or Rupert Murdoch are any better, any more honest, any more guided by ethics or moraility (or at all concerned about their obligations UNDER THE LAW while operating O&O local stations that do NOT apply to any of the MVPD's), than any of the people running the MVPD's? Please, one would have to have a bubble for head to believe that.