Social Feed

S
Supporting Founder
· posted in General Home Theater Equipment
NY Times Review
David Pogue

Source: Requires a subscription

WHEN it comes to attitudes toward high-definition TV, you can pretty much divide the world into three camps. Group A thinks HDTV is the greatest invention since the microwave, and counts the hours until the nation's transition to HDTV is complete. Group B thinks that HDTV is an enormous boondoggle, a bald-faced government-industry conspiracy to milk the citizenry for billions.

And Group C would just like somebody to explain what HDTV is.

No problem, C. HDTV is a new, improved video format. The picture is wide, like a movie screen. And it's so sharp, you can practically count the actors' pores. For many people, one look at the stunningly clear, realistic picture is enough to - well, to push them into Group A.

The trouble is, of course, that switching your life to the HDTV format involves buying all new TV sets, camcorders, VCR's and DVD players. (This, of course, is the part that irks Group B.)

In April, Sony indicated its interest in assisting with this problem by releasing the semiprofessional HDR-FX1 camcorder ($3,300) - a camcorder whose video is so brilliant and immaculate, TV stations and production companies fell head over heels in love.

Unfortunately, the FX1 is much too big to use as an everyday family camcorder; walk into the school play with this on your shoulder, and people will think you're shooting for HBO. What the world really wants - well, the world of forward-thinking picture-quality nuts, anyway - is a high-def camcorder with the size, shape and price of a regular camcorder. Is that so much to ask?

Not anymore. Sony's new HDR-HC1 is the world's smallest and least expensive HD camcorder. At 7.4 by 2.8 by 3.7 inches, it's about a third the size of previous HD models, and small enough to pass for an ordinary digital camcorder. At $1,750 online, it's about half the price of the FX1. And as if price and size didn't make the HC1 distinctive enough, here's the best news of all: it's also an absolutely terrific camcorder.

FOR one thing, it's beautifully designed. It announces its differentness quietly and tastefully, through a sleek, shiny black body. Because it's the first high-definition camera that can be operated with only one hand, Sony thoughtfully put the most important controls right where you expect to find them.

The jacks (like FireWire, U.S.B. and video outputs) are also conveniently placed, in a neat line along the lower-left edge, hidden behind protective doors. The lens barrel is graced by a manual focus-zoom ring - a rarity in consumer cams - that makes possible certain shots that you can't achieve any other way.

Transitional times call for transitional camcorders, and the HC1, like its larger predecessors, offers all kinds of flexibility. For example, it's a so-called HDV camcorder, meaning that it records all that high-def goodness onto ordinary MiniDV tapes, which you can grab at a drugstore for $5 each.

To make matters even more flexible, this camcorder can record in high-definition or standard format. (The flip-out, 2.7-inch liquid-crystal display is shaped to fit the wide-screen HDTV picture; when you record a standard-format, squarish picture, black bars appear at the sides.)

And as a final courtesy, the HC1 can play either kind of recordings - standard or high-def - on either kind of TV set. You won't see HDTV clarity on your 1985 Zenith, of course, but at least you'll see something.

If you have a high-definition set, though, you'll see a lot more than something. You'll see a spectacular picture in a format the geeks call 1080i high-def. The video is so clear and sharp, it's not so much a home movie as a flashback.

The camera is well-stocked with features, too. Some are typical for Sony - a "minutes remaining" display for the battery, for example, and an infrared, "night-vision goggles" mode that lets you record in complete darkness.

The 2.8-megapixel still photos are better than on most camcorders, although still no match for dedicated digital cameras. The HC1 even inherited a junior version of a clever FX1 feature: you can ask it to memorize two zoom, focus or exposure settings, which you can think of as Start and End. Then, at the touch of a button, the camera smoothly glides from one to the other - a very professional effect.

So if the HC1 is so wonderful, who would bother paying nearly twice as much for the FX1?


Pros, mainly. The FX1 has many more manual controls and advanced features. Above all, though, it has three chips - one sensor each for the primary video colors - which lets it capture amazingly true color in almost every lighting condition.


Like most consumer camcorders, the HC1 has only one sensor. Its color reproduction still blows away other one-chip models, but in shadowy portions of low-light shots, the HC1's video is just as likely to teem with dancing grainy molecules (known as video noise).

Otherwise, you'll be thrilled with the video captured by this comfortable, confident camera. In fact, considering how many things Sony got right on this machine, it seems almost ungrateful to point out its flaws.

Battery life is one of them. The included battery is good for only 45 minutes of HD recording. You can buy a bigger battery, but then you'll bump, literally, into another problem: the eyepiece viewfinder doesn't extend outward to cover the added depth of beefier batteries. Roman noses, beware.

It's also worth noting that the HC1's tape compartment is on the bottom. That's a common design in consumer cams, but it means that you can't change tapes when the camera is on a tripod.

Sony has once again chosen to make the camera's body look simpler and cleaner by relegating most control buttons to displays on the flip-out touch screen. As always, though, that's a tradeoff. It means, for example, that when you want to play back some video for the family on the TV, you have to keep the screen open, scarfing down battery power. That's where the Play, Stop and Rewind buttons appear.

Finally, even at its most zoomed-out position, the lens is zoomed in a lot more than you'd probably like (another common foible of consumer cams).

In photographers' terms, the HC1 has a 41-480mm zoom equivalent; in human terms, you have to stand way back to fit someone's entire body into the frame. Unless you add an unwieldy wide-angle adapter lens, count on a lot of waist-up shots of people in the same room.

Considering the scope of the HC1's achievement, though, these are just nits. This camcorder will attract a heck of a lot of fans - so many, in fact, that the nagging question of mid-decade HDTV enthusiasts will begin cropping up more often: Once you've shot some amazing high-def video, how will you show it?

You can edit it on a Mac or PC, but most HD-compatible editing programs are very expensive. (The exception is Apple's iMovie HD, which costs $80 as part of a five-program package.) You can't save your masterpiece to a tape, because who has a high-definition VCR? And you can't burn it to a DVD, because high-definition DVD recorders are not yet here.

For the moment, then, there's only one practical way to replay your life's high-definition moments: by connecting the HC1 directly to your HDTV set.

In other words, buying a high-def camcorder today is a decidedly forward-thinking move. It allows you to capture the priceless moments today, at the best possible quality, even though the rest of the HDTV puzzle pieces have yet to fall into place.

If that kind of "shoot now, show later" philosophy appeals to you, thank Sony. The HC1 is a true breakthrough in price and size, and it brings the potential of dazzling high-definition video to an enormous new audience.

Welcome to the future, Group A. The line forms here.
0 Replies · 1769 views
"MysteryMan"
Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I created this thread on the original Edgecutter Cutting Edge Forums site. It's simply a place for those to review the latest software available for those using Windows 10 and Windows 11. To date it has received 112,559 views. I have been asked by staff to continue this thread here.
535 Replies · 49114 views
Foxbat
Wow. I guess it's good that incantation still works. I would have figured that Microsoft would have come up with a better solution to patch management by now. I think I learned that back in the W2000 or XP days…
  • Like
Reactions: HipKat and Tweek
HipKat
Wow. I guess it's good that incantation still works. I would have figured that Microsoft would have come up with a better solution to patch management by now. I think I learned that back in the W2000 or XP days…
I'll be running it this weekend. I had to boot into Windows the other day, and it froze after booting with a Python error. A hard reset, and it booted fine, but I've had Wiondows freeze a few times over the last few months during boot.

Those commands are something I've always kept for times like this, after I run Samsung Magician, should it not find the issue.
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
harshness
... but I've had Wiondows freeze a few times over the last few months during boot.
I highly recommend running a default Memtest86 test (four passes, all tests) on the machine. Note that it may take all night.
primestar31
I use a Beelink Mini PC, Intel 12th Gen Alder Lake- N95 running Windows 11 Pro as my Channels DVR. I only log into it when I need to, and do that with the Remote Desktop app from my personal Windows 10 laptop.

It runs Channels DVR, plus Docker Desktop and a few bridge programs used with Channels like that. It's supposed to auto-logon into my profile back into the Windows Desktop, and auto start all those things. EVERY TIME it reboots for whatever reason, usually only AFTER one of these push updates at 3am, Channels itself restarts fine, but my Docker Desktop and two bridge programs do NOT restart unintended like they should.

IF I then log into the Windows desktop using the Remote Desktop app, Docker and my bridge programs THEN engage and startup as they should.

What's wrong with my settings, so I can fix this once and for all to properly log into my profile after an automatic update reboot to bring up Windows and allow these programs to autostart as they should?
b4pjoe
I use a Beelink Mini PC, Intel 12th Gen Alder Lake- N95 running Windows 11 Pro as my Channels DVR. I only log into it when I need to, and do that with the Remote Desktop app from my personal Windows 10 laptop.

It runs Channels DVR, plus Docker Desktop and a few bridge programs used with Channels like that. It's supposed to auto-logon into my profile back into the Windows Desktop, and auto start all those things. EVERY TIME it reboots for whatever reason, usually only AFTER one of these push updates at 3am, Channels itself restarts fine, but my Docker Desktop and two bridge programs do NOT restart unintended like they should.

IF I then log into the Windows desktop using the Remote Desktop app, Docker and my bridge programs THEN engage and startup as they should.

What's wrong with my settings, so I can fix this once and for all to properly log into my profile after an automatic update reboot to bring up Windows and allow these programs to autostart as they should?
I don't use docker on my windows 11 pc but I do use Channels DVR and after updates it reverts back to the login screen and Channels DVR does not run until I login. I have been burned by this several times. How are you getting windows 11 to auto log in?
primestar31
How are you getting windows 11 to auto log in?
Apparently, I'm not, that's my problem.

The Channels DVR software can be set as a service, and that starts automatically whether anybody is logged in or not after the pc reboots. That's a choice when you first install it by checking a box. There's likely a way to bring that choice back up after it's been installed for a while, BUT, you'd have to ask them on their forum for the best way to do it as I don't remember.

Channels Community
Linus Tech Tips
· posted in Linus Tech Tips
0 Replies · 2 views
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in What's Cooking?
We have a Breakfast and Dinner thread so... :)
Continuing from the Breakfast thread, found Cornbread mix so ...
Yellow Cornbread Mix
2 Hatch Green Chiles -diced
1 Egg
2/3 cup of milk
add to greased pan
Bake for 400f 20-25 minutes(From instructions)
now to put together and try... this to go with pinto beans...
5454 Replies · 337658 views
TRG
TRG
Breakfast for lunch. Crispy corned beef hash, home fries, two over easy eggs and sourdough toast.

1653.webp
TRG
TRG
Grabbed a burrito on the run. Beef, pinto beans, green chile and cheese. Stewart's cream soda.

burr.webp
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony and dfergie
dfergie
Beef, bean green chile, cheese homemade burritos here... Water
  • Like
Reactions: TRG
dfergie
Juicy Lucy jalapeño burger… Tea
  • Like
Reactions: TRG
dfergie
TheRatPatrol
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
Anyone else watch this show? Any guesses as to what was in the box Gibbs gave to Abby that was on her desk? It look liked it was glowing.

I also heard that someone was leaving the show at the end of this season. Any guesses as to who thats going to be?
2137 Replies · 216260 views
KAB
KAB
I wonder it they will show the teased meeting (in Origins) with Tony and Gibbs.
Jimbo
I wonder it they will show the teased meeting (in Origins) with Tony and Gibbs.
I'm curious how they are going to implement Tony into Origins (If they do) ...
Tony was introduced to Gibbs and the team, on NCIS, which makes it the Mothership side of things, he worked in Baltimore prior to NCIS, NO mention when they met that anyone had known one another ...
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Simmons
Jimbo
I wonder it they will show the teased meeting (in Origins) with Tony and Gibbs.
Teased Meeting ?
dfergie
I didn't recognize him till I saw this... (William Katt)

View: https://youtu.be/n9S3F87A588?si=tU_YQX6h3vDmrGEf

Good episode.
  • Like
Reactions: teachsac
dfergie
Good one, Katrina Law's daughter played the little girl.
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
11 Replies · 232 views
dfergie
First rule - if you get a clue follow it immediately, 2nd - keep your stuff with you in a strange place, 3rd - pay attention to your ride... (pre first - don't go if you think you might not want to stay Rob)
teachsac
Loved the tribal🤣
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
dfergie
Happy with the outcome, he was annoying...
dfergie
Luck or unluck of the draw, plus the others using idols and shot in the dark sealed their fate.
Christian wasted the extra vote giving it away...
ewindowman
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Looks like dish is Bankrupt. Filling tomorrow Tuesday June 30th
502 Replies · 18703 views
JSheridan
AT&T runs First Net which was set up so first responders have a signal almost everywhere, which is the case around here and up and down the east coast when I've been traveling. In my experience T-Mobile has the fastest network but patchy coverage while Verizon has a slow network and also patchy coverage as well. We also have a iPhone on T-Mobile and one on Mobile-X which uses the Verizon network, so comparison is easy.
EarDemon
AT&T runs First Net which was set up so first responders have a signal almost everywhere, which is the case around here and up and down the east coast when I've been traveling. In my experience T-Mobile has the fastest network but patchy coverage while Verizon has a slow network and also patchy coverage as well. We also have a iPhone on T-Mobile and one on Mobile-X which uses the Verizon network, so comparison is easy.
I did a 2500 mile round trip road trip a few weeks ago, there were a handful of places where Verizon had service and I had nothing on FirstNet. Most notably in the backwoods of Kentucky and Tennessee. Those same places I had no service on T-Mobile either. In populated areas, like the Lexington metro and Knoxville metro AT&T not only had great coverage, better than Verizon and T-Mobile generally, they have n77 everywhere. I hit 1.2 Gbps or higher pretty much everywhere, beating out the other two. That is the exact opposite here back in Western NY. Very little n77 on AT&T here and T-Mobile always rockets to 1.5 Gbps or higher.

As far as I know, there is no AT&T tower in my town. The tower I connect to when I'm outside, no service indoors, is one about 4.5 miles north of me in a different town, I can barley latch on to band 12, not 14. It's LTE only but when near that tower I exceed 200 Mbps which is phenomenal for low band LTE, but T-Mobile and Verizon have mid band on the same tower, and i'm well over a gig.

I'm looking forward to the n14 conversion and deployment of n79/4.9 GHz. Since AT&T can't sell their home internet service in NY State, I don't expect big things from them besides the enhancements to FirstNet.
Almighty1
AT&T basically went downhill as even for Internet, they were slow in offering services as AT&T WorldNet did not exist until 1994.
In 1994, the commercialization of the Internet accelerated rapidly, forcing major telecommunications giants like AT&T to compete directly with pioneering network operators like BBN (Bolt Beranek and Newman).

AT&T's Early Moves. In October 1994, AT&T launched its first public World Wide Web presence (www.att.com). However, AT&T initially lagged behind rivals in offering direct, commercial Internet backbone and access services, leading it to look for external partnerships to catch up quickly.

Having built and operated the original ARPANET, BBN formed its commercial Internet service provider (ISP) division, BBN Planet, in 1994. By the end of that year, BBN acquired regional networks like SURAnet, making it the largest provider of corporate and institutional Internet access in the United States.

Long-distance rival MCI moved faster than AT&T into commercial Internet infrastructure. Alongside Sprint, IBM, and UUNet, MCI operated one of the primary commercial Internet backbones as the government-funded NSFNET prepared for decommissioning in 1995.

Because AT&T needed immediate enterprise-grade Internet capabilities to counter MCI and Sprint, AT&T forged a major alliance with BBN Planet in mid-1995.

According to The New York Times, AT&T guaranteed BBN Planet at least $120 million in revenue over three years to supply Internet access and security services to AT&T's corporate clients, while also purchasing a minority stake in the company.

While the BBN partnership gave AT&T an immediate foothold in corporate Internet services, AT&T soon built out its own massive consumer and enterprise infrastructure, launching dial-up service AT&T WorldNet in 1996. So basically AT&T would use BBNPlanet's backbone and BBNPlanet would then use MCI's backbone for anything they didn't handle directly.

Meanwhile, GTE acquired BBN in 1997, eventually merging it into what became Verizon's network assets.

Found this online:

Only thing was I thought AT&T split into 13 Regional Bell Operating Companies and not 7 like it says.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Bobby
Only thing was I thought AT&T split into 13 Regional Bell Operating Companies and not 7 like it says.
The 13 Regional Bell companies were pre-divestiture.
comfortably_numb
The 13 Regional Bell companies were pre-divestiture.

And of all of them, only Cincinnati Bell remains, correct?
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Bobby
And of all of them, only Cincinnati Bell remains, correct?
I believe that is correct.
JSheridan
... Since AT&T can't sell their home internet service in NY State, I don't expect big things from them besides the enhancements to FirstNet.
We're in NY and we can now. We're an AT&T retailer and have been selling AT&T Internet Air for a few months. It's $35 a month if you're an AT&T post paid subscriber, $55 a month if you're not a subscriber.
K
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
· posted in DIRECTV Programming Forum
11/25 - 11/29 Thanksgiving Free Preview
515-523 Cinemax
525-542 Starz
545-556 Paramount+ with Showtime
558-560 MGM+
0 Replies · 15 views
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68823 Replies · 2691957 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
H
PLAY The Game Tonight-Kansas
ClarkGable
It's All In The Game - Tommy Edwards
Bobby
All In Love Is Fair - Barbra Streisand
harshness
Lost in Love - Air Supply
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
EatMyVolts
You're Lost Little Girl -- The Doors