Social Feed

nathan86

Last reply Mar 24, 2022 · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

1000.4 dish dpp lnb eastern arc

So I'm trying to build myself a mobile dish from an old 1000.4 I had in my yard and I thought I had the right lnb for it but when I got it neither of the brackets I had would fit the dpp lnb I have. I know there's no way to mount a hybrid lnb on this but will this lnb work. It said it's an lnb for a 1000.2 but I figured it would still work. I did manage to get it physically mounted using the old bracket that was on the dish originally but I had to trim a little bit of plastic they was keeping it from slipping in. Otherwise it lined up.

I then tried to align it and had everything f set right and I was able to hit 61.5 but I couldn't seem to get it to hit 72 as well. Do I need a new lnb? Like I said this is a twin eastern arc dpp lnb I think originally for a 1000.2.

22 Replies · 5350 views

Load Replies (22) Reply Legacy View

cableview

Mar 22, 2022

You're going to have to mess around a lot with the angles here. That LNB is designed for the smaller 1000.2 dish, but it IS possible to get it to work on the 1000.4. You will likely have to set the skew much lower than usual, and fine tune adjust it. The original 1000.4 EA LNB has the 61.5 and 72.7 eyes directly next to each other, so the spot it reflects is different. Another option is to physically bend the dish if you can't get the skew to work.

NYDutch

Mar 22, 2022

cableview said:
You're going to have to mess around a lot with the angles here. That LNB is designed for the smaller 1000.2 dish, but it IS possible to get it to work on the 1000.4. You will likely have to set the skew much lower than usual, and fine tune adjust it. The original 1000.4 EA LNB has the 61.5 and 72.7 eyes directly next to each other, so the spot it reflects is different. Another option is to physically bend the dish if you can't get the skew to work.

The original 1000.4 EA LNB has three "eyes" with the 77 and 72.7 next to each other and then a gap to the 61.5. I have two of them I switch in and out with a WA triple LNB as needed. A 1000.2 DPP LNB will fit a 1000.4 dish by cutting the plastic tab off the arm adapter.

These are both 1000.4 EA LNB's:

Reactions: HipKat, TheKrell and charlesrshell

cableview

Mar 22, 2022

NYDutch said:
The original 1000.4 EA LNB has three "eyes" with the 77 and 72.7 next to each other and then a gap to the 61.5. I have two of them I switch in and out with a WA triple LNB as needed. A 1000.2 DPP LNB will fit a 1000.4 dish by cutting the plastic tab off the arm adapter.

These are both 1000.4 EA LNB's:

View attachment 156198

View attachment 156199

Yes, we are stating the same thing I just believe I worded myself wrong. And yes, the LNB has no problem fitting the arm, it is just hard to adjust a 1000.2 LNB to get signal on both orbitals on a 1000.4 reflector, it requires weird adjustments.

NYDutch

Mar 22, 2022

cableview said:
Yes, we are stating the same thing I just believe I worded myself wrong. And yes, the LNB has no problem fitting the arm, it is just hard to adjust a 1000.2 LNB to get signal on both orbitals on a 1000.4 reflector, it requires weird adjustments.

My spare WA triple DPP LNB came from a 1000.2 installation that was upgraded to DPH. It works the same on my 1000.4 as the 1000.4 LNB. I'll give a 1000.2 EA twin LNB a try when I get my hands on one.

Reactions: HipKat and charlesrshell

cableview

Mar 22, 2022

NYDutch said:
My spare WA triple DPP LNB came from a 1000.2 installation that was upgraded to DPH. It works the same on my 1000.4 as the 1000.4 LNB. I'll give a 1000.2 EA twin LNB a try when I get my hands on one.

1000.4 WA and 1000.2 WA DPP LNBs have the eyes in the exact same position, which is why this is able to work. The 1000.4 EA LNB has the 61.5 and 72.7 orbital eyes close together, and centered left, as opposed to the 1000.2 EA DPP with the eyes centered middle and seperated more. The 1000.4 dish wasn't made to pick up these orbitals in this middle position, as it was designed to pick both up on the left side.

NYDutch

Mar 22, 2022

cableview said:
1000.4 WA and 1000.2 WA DPP LNBs have the eyes in the exact same position, which is why this is able to work. The 1000.4 EA LNB has the 61.5 and 72.7 orbital eyes close together, and centered left, as opposed to the 1000.2 EA DPP with the eyes centered middle and seperated more. The 1000.4 dish wasn't made to pick up these orbitals in this middle position, as it was designed to pick both up on the left side.

The two eyes that are close together on the 1000.4 EA LNB are for the 77 and 72.7 sats. The 61.5 eye is spread out to the right as seen from the back of the dish.

Reactions: HipKat, TheKrell, cableview and 1 other person

cableview

Mar 22, 2022

NYDutch said:
The two eyes that are close together on the 1000.4 EA LNB are for the 77 and 72.7 sats. The 61.5 eye is spread out to the right as seen from the back of the dish.

View attachment 156201

Interesting, thought that was the other way around, thank you for showing me.

Either way, it is difficult to point them with the 1000.2 EA DPP LNB, it is simply not meant for the style of reflector. I actively work on Dish systems in the field, and have found some incorrect setups with a 1000.2 EA LNB on a 1000.4 reflector, usually done by techs who don't carry 1000.4 LNBs and don't want to replace the entire Dish. I have been able to point these, but you will have bad signal on either 61.5 or 72.7, it isn't possible (or, is not worth the effort) to point it to get good signal on both. Typically I have seen these setups getting strong signal on 61.5, and very poor signal on 72.7. If you do decide to do this, you will notice the weird angle to point it to get both orbitals, it is rather difficult. Not the hardest rigged up setup I've seen at all, but it is somewhat difficult.

Reactions: TheKrell and NYDutch

NYDutch

Mar 22, 2022

cableview said:
Interesting, thought that was the other way around, thank you for showing me.

Either way, it is difficult to point them with the 1000.2 EA DPP LNB, it is simply not meant for the style of reflector. I actively work on Dish systems in the field, and have found some incorrect setups with a 1000.2 EA LNB on a 1000.4 reflector, usually done by techs who don't carry 1000.4 LNBs and don't want to replace the entire Dish. I have been able to point these, but you will have bad signal on either 61.5 or 72.7, it isn't possible (or, is not worth the effort) to point it to get good signal on both. Typically I have seen these setups getting strong signal on 61.5, and very poor signal on 72.7. If you do decide to do this, you will notice the weird angle to point it to get both orbitals, it is rather difficult. Not the hardest rigged up setup I've seen at all, but it is somewhat difficult.

As I said, I'll give it a try when I get my hands on one. I've aimed many 1000.2 and 1000.4 dishes, including aiming my own as often as daily, but just not a 1000.2 EA LNB on a 1000.4 dish. The WA LNBs are completely interchangeable except for the easily eliminated adapter tab.

Reactions: charlesrshell and cableview

nathan86

Mar 23, 2022

NYDutch said:
As I said, I'll give it a try when I get my hands on one. I've aimed many 1000.2 and 1000.4 dishes, including aiming my own as often as daily, but just not a 1000.2 EA LNB on a 1000.4 dish. The WA LNBs are completely interchangeable except for the easily eliminated adapter tab.

I ended up finding another brand new 1000.2 on the cheap so I think I'll just ditch my 1000.4 so I can use the lnb I already have. I'll probably also go ahead and buy myself a WA hybrid lnb for it as well so I can hit either arc while I'm on the road. Thanks for the help everyone.

Reactions: TheKrell, NYDutch, HipKat and 1 other person

HipKat

Mar 23, 2022

cableview said:
1000.4 WA and 1000.2 WA DPP LNBs have the eyes in the exact same position, which is why this is able to work. The 1000.4 EA LNB has the 61.5 and 72.7 orbital eyes close together, and centered left, as opposed to the 1000.2 EA DPP with the eyes centered middle and seperated more. The 1000.4 dish wasn't made to pick up these orbitals in this middle position, as it was designed to pick both up on the left side.

It's not the 61 and 72 that are close together, it's the 72 and the 77. The 61 is the one off by itself. A dish is a reflection of the sky so the "eyes" on the LNB are backward if viewed from behind the dish.

Also the ,2 and ,4 WA "eyes" are not in the same place. They're in the same position but spread further apart on the .4 due to the bigger reflector and the longer feed arm

And just a word, you're new here on a forum that's populated by long-time Satellite and Dish enthusiasts, power users if you will and installers that have been in the game for a long, long time.

Reactions: TheKrell, NYDutch and charlesrshell

HipKat

Mar 23, 2022

nathan86 said:
I ended up finding another brand new 1000.2 on the cheap so I think I'll just ditch my 1000.4 so I can use the lnb I already have. I'll probably also go ahead and buy myself a WA hybrid lnb for it as well so I can hit either arc while I'm on the road. Thanks for the help everyone.

That's more convenient and versatile, to go with a 1000.2 but man, I miss .4's and that fine adjustment that could really peak out the dish

Reactions: TheKrell, NYDutch and charlesrshell

nathan86

Mar 23, 2022

HipKat said:
It's not the 61 and 72 that are close together, it's the 72 and the 77. The 61 is the one off by itself. A dish is a reflection of the sky so the "eyes" on the LNB are backward if viewed from behind the dish.

Also the ,2 and ,4 WA "eyes" are not in the same place. They're in the same position but spread further apart on the .4 due to the bigger reflector and the longer feed arm

And just a word, you're new here on a forum that's populated by long-time Satellite and Dish enthusiasts, power users if you will and installers that have been in the game for a long, long time.

This would definitely explain why I seemed to be able to hit one or the other but never both. I managed to get an ok signal on 72 (like 51) last time I tried but could only get like 18 on the 61 with this setup.

BTW I liked the 1000.4 better as well. It seems a lot less flimsy than the 1000.2.

Reactions: HipKat and TheKrell

TheKrell

Mar 23, 2022

nathan86 said:
BTW I liked the 1000.4 better as well. It seems a lot less flimsy than the 1000.2.

Yeah, and the struts really steady it. I had an extra long J mast on a dish 500 which literally blew off my roof in a strong wind and was dangling in front of the kitchen window by the coaxes when I got home from work. :eeek

I am so lucky it didn't break that window. Anyhow, I repaired the roof damage, screwed it back up there, and guyed it. That fixed that until my maple tree grew even taller. :crying

Reactions: HipKat and charlesrshell

cableview

Mar 24, 2022

HipKat said:
It's not the 61 and 72 that are close together, it's the 72 and the 77. The 61 is the one off by itself. A dish is a reflection of the sky so the "eyes" on the LNB are backward if viewed from behind the dish.

Also the ,2 and ,4 WA "eyes" are not in the same place. They're in the same position but spread further apart on the .4 due to the bigger reflector and the longer feed arm

And just a word, you're new here on a forum that's populated by long-time Satellite and Dish enthusiasts, power users if you will and installers that have been in the game for a long, long time.

I appreciate the info about the positioning of the orbitals being mirrored into the LNB, that helps me understand why some situations it seemed like a dish that shouldn't be getting a signal seemed to work just fine (left eye was pointed directly into a Hughesnet dish).

And yes, I am aware of many people here being familiar with the systems more than me. I more deal with wiring homes with coaxial and cat cables. I joined here in order to get knowledge from many of you.

This being said, you have likely encountered 1000.4 reflectors with 1000.2 EA LNBs on them. Maybe you are able to point these easily from being experienced in it, but the average customer is going to struggle getting signal like this. That is why I am stating it is difficult. It is by no means impossible, but it requires knowledge about reflector angles and having a good meter which most customers won't have access too. I'm sure with enough time it can be figured out, but it isn't easy for me, and I have worked on a fair amount of systems.

Reactions: HipKat

NYDutch

Mar 24, 2022

cableview said:
I appreciate the info about the positioning of the orbitals being mirrored into the LNB, that helps me understand why some situations it seemed like a dish that shouldn't be getting a signal seemed to work just fine (left eye was pointed directly into a Hughesnet dish).

And yes, I am aware of many people here being familiar with the systems more than me. I more deal with wiring homes with coaxial and cat cables. I joined here in order to get knowledge from many of you.

This being said, you have likely encountered 1000.4 reflectors with 1000.2 EA LNBs on them. Maybe you are able to point these easily from being experienced in it, but the average customer is going to struggle getting signal like this. That is why I am stating it is difficult. It is by no means impossible, but it requires knowledge about reflector angles and having a good meter which most customers won't have access too. I'm sure with enough time it can be figured out, but it isn't easy for me, and I have worked on a fair amount of systems.

The vast majority of Dish customers do not self install their equipment. As I said, I have not tried a 1000.2 EA LNB on a 1000.4 dish yet, but from examining photos, the only aiming issue I see would be a slight azimuth deviation due to the 72.7 "eye" being slightly off center compared to the 1000.4 triple EA LNB. The skew and elevation appear to be the same, just as they are using a 1000.2 WA LNB.

Reactions: HipKat and charlesrshell

View all replies (22)

JSheridan

Lifetime Supporter

Last reply Yesterday at 11:27 PM · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

All DMA's now Western Arc

I know HipKat said that they were working on conversions but we got the official news yesterday right from Dish that starting next month all DMA's will be on the western arc, and all customers will be assigned to that. That's gonna mean a lot of customers around here aren't gonna get Dish unless there are exceptions. Too many mountains and trees.

156 Replies · 4323 views

Load Replies (156) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: That American Girl, MikeD-C05, AkaDoubleG and 6 others

Foxbat

Sep 25, 2026

Unless Dish acquires DirecTV and its mid-USA satellite slots, I may not have Dish Network to reach 40 years. Or, I guess we could buy a new house…

Reactions: charlesrshell

slow_poke_pete

Yesterday at 8:37 PM

Foxbat said:
Unless Dish acquires DirecTV and its mid-USA satellite slots, I may not have Dish Network to reach 40 years. Or, I guess we could buy a new house…

have charlie buy you a new house :biggrin

Reactions: charlesrshell

telstar_1

Yesterday at 8:46 PM

Well, I didn't immediately think of broadcast, where there are all kinds of digital "subchannels"- I remember back when digital broadcast began that supposedly the 6mhz channel would likely support just 1 HD program and that the added subchannels would likely have to remain SD. I don't watch enough broadcast to know. Are there a lot of the subchannels in SD-only, and how do they do that, like are they in 4:3 or some kind of low-res widescreen?

Reactions: charlesrshell

Foxbat

Yesterday at 8:53 PM

slow_poke_pete said:
have charlie buy you a new house

Unfortunately, I don't think my social proximity to Charle Ergen provides any special perks. Maybe if Foxbat, Jr. were to marry his daughter…

Reactions: Bobby, slow_poke_pete and charlesrshell

slow_poke_pete

Yesterday at 9:11 PM

Foxbat said:
Unfortunately, I don't think my social proximity to Charle Ergen provides any special perks. Maybe if Foxbat, Jr. were to marry his daughter…

that would be one hell of a convo :biggrin

Reactions: charlesrshell

osu1991

Yesterday at 11:27 PM

telstar_1 said:
Well, I didn't immediately think of broadcast, where there are all kinds of digital "subchannels"- I remember back when digital broadcast began that supposedly the 6mhz channel would likely support just 1 HD program and that the added subchannels would likely have to remain SD. I don't watch enough broadcast to know. Are there a lot of the subchannels in SD-only, and how do they do that, like are they in 4:3 or some kind of low-res widescreen?

New more efficient encoders. I think there's around 60 channels/sub channels now in the Tulsa dma. 480 widescreen for most of the sub channels, but some have 2 HD channels and a couple of SD sub channels while others have 1 HD and 5 or more SD sub channels. If they moved to mp4 or hevc encoding they could do higher bitrates for SD or more HD or even 4K in that 6Mhz channel. That could render some early digital tvs unable to tune though as they may not have the codecs for that. Considering 4K tvs have been on sale for years, I think it would be a very small minority of TVs with the problem. I'd rather see that happen and keep ATSC 1 than continue the move to a DRM enforced ATSC 3 world.

Reactions: charlesrshell

View all replies (156)

SatZach

Last reply Yesterday at 10:51 PM · posted in The Chit Chat Club

Is Roku the new Legacy Cable?

The title was to catch everyone's eye lol! But it is a thought I've been having as I dev a Roku app for a client. You see many MAAANY years ago I got really interested in cable TV channels and even chatted with a regional carrier, Insight about what it took to get a channel number. It was surprisingly easy although prohibitively expensive.

You could petition, reserve a high channel number, they monitored performance and if they liked you, you'd get lower channel number overtime and cut into ad overlays.

Roku has a similar setup. Make an app, if it has a strong, original linear component you could get channel assignment on The Roku Channel.

As mixed as my feelings are on the current media landscape, I can't help but feel a little excited interest when I scope out the apps in the Roku store.

2 Replies · 44 views

Load Replies (2) Reply Legacy View

navychop

Yesterday at 9:53 PM

Hmmm. I think Roku will last. But will Firestick? With their backing, I guess so. Apple TV STB? Of Course. Walmart? Seems someone ought to go, but with their backing?….

Off brands have, as probably expected, very short lives.

SatZach

Yesterday at 10:51 PM

navychop said:
Hmmm. I think Roku will last. But will Firestick? With their backing, I guess so. Apple TV STB? Of Course. Walmart? Seems someone ought to go, but with their backing?….

Off brands have, as probably expected, very short lives.

All of those services have FAST Channels. FAST is a linear online broadcast stndrd. You notice how their linear channels all have some overlap? They are gettting paid for every second those streams are up without really having to do their own accounting. Best part is they don't even facilitate any of the stream bandwidth. Over glorified app stores on some android hardware. No reason NOT to stay in the game.

klang

Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

Last reply Yesterday at 9:52 PM · posted in TV Shows

Star Trek: Starfleet Academy - Paramount+

Season 2 order already in hand:

'Star Trek: Starfleet Academy' Renewed for Season 2, Tatiana Maslany to Guest Star in Season 1

I've not been optimistic about this show based on what I've read so far. Seems to be aimed at a younger audience. Interesting though that Tatiana Maslany will have some sort of role.

94 Replies · 3715 views

Load Replies (94) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: MikeD-C05, TheKrell and Foxbat

harshness

Yesterday at 11:53 AM

Females wearing any clothing is unthinkable on Ferenginar.

Reactions: Foxbat

long_time_Dish

Yesterday at 3:35 PM

harshness said:
Females wearing any clothing is unthinkable on Ferenginar.

Was never a huge of the Ferengi-centric episodes in Trek...

Jimbo

Yesterday at 8:14 PM

long_time_Dish said:
Was never a huge of the Ferengi-centric episodes in Trek...

Me either ...
They turned out to be a Poor adversary ....

Foxbat

Yesterday at 9:02 PM

They got their proper due on "Deep Space Nine"

Reactions: long_time_Dish

long_time_Dish

Yesterday at 9:52 PM

Foxbat said:
They got their proper due on "Deep Space Nine"

And too many episodes centering on/around them as well...

View all replies (94)

SuperDish_Fan23

Last reply Yesterday at 8:43 PM · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Its crazy how the ViP922 is so rare for no reason.

Why are ViP922s So rare? like its crazy how ebay has none, i checked everywhere, also, i got a ViP222k now, which is actually activated!

35 Replies · 1105 views

Load Replies (35) Reply Legacy View

Strega

Wednesday at 6:21 PM

I looked for wrecked trains on ebay and those are hard to find too!

Reactions: AZ., dishdude and charlesrshell

Almighty1

Thursday at 8:53 PM

I remember this in the news too...

$14,000 spent on rented rotary phone

A widow rented a rotary dial telephone for 42 years, paying what her family calculates as more than $14,000 for a now- outdated phone.

www.nbcnews.com

Reactions: MikeD-C05 and charlesrshell

Bobby

Thursday at 9:21 PM

Almighty1 said:
I remember this in the news too...

$14,000 spent on rented rotary phone

A widow rented a rotary dial telephone for 42 years, paying what her family calculates as more than $14,000 for a now- outdated phone.

www.nbcnews.com

That is a misnomer. In the old days you subscribed to telephone service. That included the telephone line and one telephone. An extension cost $1 a month extra. So that $14,000 over 42 years was for the service not the leased telephone. There is no way they paid $28 a month for 42 years for a leased telephone.

Reactions: MikeD-C05, charlesrshell, AZ. and 2 others

SuperDish_Fan23

Friday at 4:24 PM

SuperDish_Fan23 said:
Why are ViP922s So rare? like its crazy how ebay has none, i checked everywhere, also, i got a ViP222k now, which is actually activated!

Whoever still has their 922, please let me know i just wanna see photos of the ui and other stuff

Reactions: MikeD-C05 and charlesrshell

slow_poke_pete

Friday at 5:51 PM

SuperDish_Fan23 said:
Whoever still has their 922, please let me know i just wanna see photos of the ui and other stuff

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wL6dsORmXg

Reactions: SuperDish_Fan23 and charlesrshell

telstar_1

Friday at 5:58 PM

Slicker guides never did much for me

Reactions: charlesrshell

Almighty1

Friday at 10:33 PM

Bobby said:
That is a misnomer. In the old days you subscribed to telephone service. That included the telephone line and one telephone. An extension cost $1 a month extra. So that $14,000 over 42 years was for the service not the leased telephone. There is no way they paid $28 a month for 42 years for a leased telephone.

Good point as part of that time mentioned was before I was even alive.

While reports from the family's case focused entirely on the equipment rental charges, media records show that Ester Strogen originally started by paying $29.95 per quarter ($9.98 per month) in the 1960s for her combined telephone connection.
The actual base cost for standard residential telephone service over a 42-year period (spanning roughly 1964 to 2006) reveals how basic connection costs evolved compared to the equipment rental fees:

Historical Phone Service Rates

1960s – 1970s Base Rate: Standard local phone service was heavily subsidized and tightly regulated under the Bell System monopoly. A basic landline package with unlimited local calling typically cost between $5.00 and $10.00 per month.
1980s – 2000s Post-Deregulation Rate: Following the AT&T divestiture in 1984, base line service rates steadily climbed due to the introduction of subscriber line charges, touch-tone fees, and local infrastructure adjustments. By 2006, basic flat-rate local residential phone service hovered around $15.00 to $25.00 per month (excluding long-distance packages and taxes).

The True Lifetime Service Bill

Assuming an average baseline connection fee of roughly $12.00 a month over that 42-year span, the line connectivity itself would have realistically accumulated to approximately $6,000 in raw cash payouts.
When you bundle the actual service costs together with the escalating equipment rental fees, the total cumulative out-of-pocket phone expenses over those four decades easily crossed $12,000 to $14,000. Long-distance phone calls—which were billed entirely by the minute back then and could cost up to 15 to 30 cents per minute—would add significantly more to that historical total depending on usage.

The widely publicized calculation stems from a viral news story from 2006 involving a widow named Ester Strogen. Her family discovered she had been continuously leasing two rotary dial telephones from AT&T for 42 years.
The total cost—which actually came out to more than $14,000 by the time the lease was canceled—was calculated based on the following legacy telecom structure:

The Monthly Fee: At the time her granddaughters discovered the charges, the ongoing leasing fee was $29.10 per month for the two outdated phones.
The Math: Over 42 years (504 months), paying roughly $24 to $30 a month accumulates to between $12,000 and $14,600 ($29.10 × 504 months = $14,666.40).

Why did this happen?
Prior to the landmark breakup of AT&T ("Ma Bell") in 1984, consumers were legally not allowed to own their phones; they were required to lease them directly from the phone company.
When the laws changed and phone ownership became legal, AT&T spun off its rental division into a company called QLT Consumer Lease Services. Millions of customers, particularly elderly individuals who were used to seeing a single unified phone bill, simply never realized that the small recurring "equipment lease" line-item could be canceled by buying a cheap phone at a retail store.

Yes, leasing absolutely cost that much in reality, and the math is entirely accurate. However, the calculations performed by the family did contain one major historical nuance: they multiplied the final 2006 rate across all 42 years, which means the actual total cash paid out was likely a bit lower.
The original viral story focused on 82-year-old widow Ester Strogen from Canton, Ohio, who paid $29.10 a month for two black rotary phones until her family intervened in July 2006.
The reality behind how the cost reached that staggering total breaks down into two distinct phases:

Phase 1: The Historical Base Rate (1960s – 1984)

When Strogen first got the phones in the 1960s, renting was a legal mandate and cost a fraction of the 2006 price—usually just a few dollars a month.

The "Insurance" Mirage: In exchange for that fee, Ma Bell promised free, lifetime maintenance. If the phone broke, they replaced it instantly at no extra cost.
The Cost-Plus Reality: Because these solid-state phones were built like tanks out of heavy plastic and steel, they almost never broke. Consumers paid a continuous premium for decades for a repair service they rarely used.

Phase 2: The Deregulation Rate Hikes (1984 – 2006)

After AT&T was forced to break up its monopoly in 1984, the rental side of the business was shifted to Lucent Technologies and later a legacy holding company. To maximize profit off a shrinking customer base, they steadily increased the monthly rental fees over the next 20 years.

By 2006, the rental cost had quietly ballooned to roughly $14.55 per phone per month.
When the family discovered the $29.10 monthly charge, they looked back at the 42-year span and estimated the collective loss at over $14,000.

Even adjusted for historical inflation—where $2 a month in 1964 had the purchasing power of roughly $20 today—Ester Strogen and hundreds of thousands of other elderly Americans realistically paid thousands of dollars out-of-pocket for standard desk phones they could have purchased at retail for $10.

The exact out-of-pocket dollar amount Ester Strogen paid over those 42 years was never publicly determined, as neither AT&T nor the family had access to monthly billing records stretching all the way back to the 1960s.
The figures reported in the media are entirely mathematical estimates based on the 2006 rate. The two primary numbers used to define the "cost" are:

The Stated Media Total: More than $14,000.
The Exact Family Formula: $14,666.40. This was derived by taking her final recorded bill of $29.10 per month and multiplying it across the full 42 years (504 months).

What the True Cash Cost Likely Was

Because AT&T did not charge $29.10 a month back in 1964, the true historical cash sum she handed over was lower than $14,000. In the 1960s and 1970s, basic phone lease fees were generally bundled into standard service or itemized at just $1.00 to $2.00 a month per phone.
If we realistically assume she paid lower base rates for the first 20 years before the post-1984 deregulation price hikes took effect, a realistic estimate of the actual cash paid is between $5,000 and $7,000.

The Real Cost When Adjusted for Inflation

While the family's $14,000 calculation overestimates the raw cash paid, it actually underestimates the true economic damage when factoring in the time value of money.
Paying $2.00 a month for equipment in 1964 sounds minor, but due to severe inflation during the 1970s, those early single dollars had the purchasing power of roughly $20.00 each in 2006 terms. If you adjust every historical lower monthly payment upward to account for inflation, Ester Strogen realistically lost the equivalent of well over $15,000 in modern purchasing power by renting instead of buying.

Reactions: charlesrshell

slow_poke_pete

Yesterday at 8:28 PM

telstar_1 said:
Slicker guides never did much for me

me either. sometimes it seems like things disappear when they start changing sh*t around :biggrin

Reactions: charlesrshell

slow_poke_pete

Yesterday at 8:43 PM

Strega said:
I looked for wrecked trains on ebay and those are hard to find too!

you would be better off looking in ca for a train wreck to nowhere :biggrin

Reactions: charlesrshell

View all replies (35)

jcrandall

Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!

Last reply Yesterday at 8:42 PM · posted in DIRECTV Programming Forum

Channels on DIRECTV Satellite and not on Stream/Internet

So...DirecTV advertises the Choice package with 95+ bonus channels for Satellite customers. You don't want 90+ of the 95...

Excluding PPV, premium networks, infomercial, shopping, religion, and non-English programming, there are 7 channels on satellite that are not on streaming:
NFL Network, MavTV, FE TV, Free Speech, NASA, INSP, and Pursuit. I'm pretty sure a couple of those are public interest that they have to carry to meet an FCC quota on satellite.

I hope they get called out for this advertising because that is ridiculous. One big network, NFL, will probably get added to streaming when their next agreement comes up, and the rest are likely very low viewership.

What about streaming, what do you get extra with the Choice package that isn't on Satellite:
Two stations - one of which is an internet TV - Fox Weather, and Heros & Icons (a diginet). Nothing special here to look at either.

If they cleaned up a couple of their agreements, added a few public interest stations to streaming, they could probably have their lineups match. It's close now, if you take out all the garbage on satellite that they earn money on. If they can sell infomercials on satellite, why can't they on streaming, seems like a miss. A bigger miss, including those stations in the "bonus channels just for satellite customers." Pretty sad marketing right there.

Attached is a comparison sheet of satellite vs streaming for the three main packages if anyone is interested.

MOD EDIT: See Post #3 for an up to date list of what channels are available on sat but not on streaming/internet, see Post #21 for an up to date list of what's available in the app for streaming customers, but not for sat customers.

DirecTV Sat vs Stream.pdf 46 KB

243 Replies · 31874 views

Load Replies (243) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: DS0816, Tecnicoloco and Jimbo

KyL416

Aug 3, 2026

WNPX/28 Nashville (The new home of the Predators) and WMYD/20 Detroit (the new home of the Pistons) are testing on the stream server.

Reactions: darren_s, mario315, Former member 209992 and 2 others

harshness

Oct 15, 2026

One might get the impression that what DIRECTV does, or doesn't, is becoming far less consequential than it used to be.

mario315

Friday at 11:55 PM

harshness said:
One might get the impression that what DIRECTV does, or doesn't, is becoming far less consequential than it used to be.

KyL416

Saturday at 12:00 AM

WPLG/10 Miami is now available to stream customers

The CW stations WCWW/25 South Bend and WBKP/5 Marquette are testing on the stream server

Last week they also added a bunch of CW stations that are still not available to sat customers:
WETM-DT/19 Elmira
WJET-DT/25 Erie
KLFY-DT/11 Lafayette LA
KARD-DT/15 Monroe
WVBT-DT/44 Norfolk
WTWO-DT/3 Terre Haute
WFXV-DT/34 Utica
KFDX-DT/4 Wichita Falls

Reactions: Mr Tony and mario315

mario315

Saturday at 12:07 AM

Well, that was fast ! DTV Stream brought back WTCN's HD signal today.

I have to assume the station signing up a week ago as the Miami Heat affiliate here (to carry their games) did the trick. NBA magic !!!

Or the station engineer took care of the problem after hearing about it.

Reactions: KyL416

darren_s

Yesterday at 8:29 PM

KyL416 said:
WNPX/28 Nashville (The new home of the Predators) and WMYD/20 Detroit (the new home of the Pistons) are testing on the stream server.

Channel 28 Nashville hasn't been added so far, correct?

KyL416

Yesterday at 8:42 PM

WNPX Nashville and WMYD Detroit were added to stream about 2 months ago.

They also now have PRDTRS/651 for those in Predators territory outside of the Nashville DMA and PISTONS/663-2 for those in Pistons territory outside of the Detroit DMA.

View all replies (243)

TheForce

Supporting Founder Pub Member / Supporter

Last reply Yesterday at 8:32 PM · posted in The Phone & Tablet Zone

Apple Event September 2026

Apple Fall Hardware Event takes place today, September 9, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. PT / 1:00 p.m. ET. It marks the debut of new CEO John Ternus and the expected reveal of Apple's first foldable phone.

132 Replies · 1464 views

Load Replies (132) Reply Legacy View

comfortably_numb

Oct 10, 2026

Can't remember if I've posted this yet..

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfL5seXJyWU

Reactions: slow_poke_pete

Foxbat

Saturday at 11:47 AM

If you ponied up for an iPhone Duo, keep it away from anything other than your soft, fleshy fingertips. No fingernails, no dust, sand, dirt, or other particulate matter. And don't bend it more than it needs to. Zack has destroyed $2,000 of Apple hardware to get those views, which should cover his expenses.

Reactions: comfortably_numb

comfortably_numb

Saturday at 11:56 AM

Foxbat said:
No fingernails, no dust, sand, dirt, or other particulate matter

And definitely no medieval chain armor!

Reactions: Foxbat

harshness

Yesterday at 12:18 PM

comfortably_numb said:
medieval chain armor

Aka "mail" or "maille".

Reactions: Foxbat and comfortably_numb

Foxbat

Yesterday at 7:05 PM

IFixIt has published their Teardown and they had some positive things to say about the iPhone Duo. It still showed some dust ingress into the hinge assembly but seemed otherwise well-sealed.

But with a considerable number of reports of the main screen dying with similar failures, AppleCare+ should be a no-brainer for this phone.

slow_poke_pete

Yesterday at 8:31 PM

comfortably_numb said:
Can't remember if I've posted this yet..

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfL5seXJyWU

most carriers do. that's why they send updates that slow phones down!! i buy unlocked phones no effect to me

slow_poke_pete

Yesterday at 8:32 PM

Foxbat said:
IFixIt has published their Teardown and they had some positive things to say about the iPhone Duo. It still showed some dust ingress into the hinge assembly but seemed otherwise well-sealed.

But with a considerable number of reports of the main screen dying with similar failures, AppleCare+ should be a no-brainer for this phone.

hope you have apple care a screen job is 1000.00

. can we say over priced garbage!!!

View all replies (132)

meStevo

Lifetime Supporter

Last reply Yesterday at 8:17 PM · posted in The Sports Section

NFL 2026-2027 Season

Schedule drops tomorrow. Mandatory mini camps in June. Hall of Fame game August 6th.

127 Replies · 2319 views

Load Replies (127) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: Jimbo and dfergie

rvvaquero

Tuesday at 11:33 AM

Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.

Reactions: Mike0616, dfergie and b4pjoe

Yespage

Thursday at 9:15 AM

rvvaquero said:
Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson had an argument about who was responsible for the dynasty building of the early 90's Cowboys.

The rest of us figured it out in about 3 years, Jerry has had over 30 years but still can't admit it. It's all he lives for, to show everyone he can put together a winner. I don't think he can. His kids only know what he taught them.

Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.

Reactions: b4pjoe

b4pjoe

Thursday at 9:53 AM

Yespage said:
Johnson built it, but without the Herschel Walker trade, it never happens.

Jerry made himself General Manager after he bought the team but make no mistake Jimmy engineered that trade. As well as a lot of others at the time.

Reactions: rvvaquero, osu1991 and Yespage

rvvaquero

Thursday at 11:50 AM

Jimmy Johnson is a football guy. Jerry Jones is a marketer (hustler).

When I see a football player get a 15 yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct (like taunting) in a close game, I often wonder what he was thinking. Was he thinking, I'm doing everything I can to make this a better team and help win a championship? Or, was he saying to himself, I want everyone to notice how great I am?

Johnson inspires one, Jones the other.

Reactions: b4pjoe and Mike0616

meStevo

Thursday at 10:53 PM

View: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/2113438192913588676?s=20

Reactions: Mike0616 and osu1991

meStevo

Yesterday at 8:17 PM

Got to unfurl and hold the flag at Allegiant for the anthem today - amazing experience.

Reactions: Mike0616 and Foxbat

View all replies (127)

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Yesterday at 5:52 PM · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

This Week in Tech 1107

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHoCBzfrdmQ

Direct YouTube Link - This Week in Tech 1107
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed

0 Replies · 10 views

Replies Reply Legacy View

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Yesterday at 5:52 PM · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

This Week in Tech 1107

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYRNrj5MQzw

Direct YouTube Link - This Week in Tech 1107
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed

0 Replies · 17 views

Replies Reply Legacy View

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Yesterday at 5:52 PM · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

This Week in Tech 1107

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41qc5p2NdN4

Direct YouTube Link - This Week in Tech 1107
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed

Search

Search

Social Feed

1000.4 dish dpp lnb eastern arc

All DMA's now Western Arc

Is Roku the new Legacy Cable?

Star Trek: Starfleet Academy - Paramount+

Its crazy how the ViP922 is so rare for no reason.

$14,000 spent on rented rotary phone

$14,000 spent on rented rotary phone

Channels on DIRECTV Satellite and not on Stream/Internet

Apple Event September 2026

NFL 2026-2027 Season

This Week in Tech 1107

This Week in Tech 1107

This Week in Tech 1107