Social Feed

Stuart Sweet
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
· posted in The Solid Signal Blog
Unless you've been living under a rock, you probably know that Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny premieres in theaters on June 30. It's been screened at the Cannes film festival, and we've known the basic beats of the film for a while. But will it, put simply, suck?

What we know


The film takes place largely in the late 1960s, where we find Indiana Jones ready to retire. There is, apparently, a long flashback sequence to 1939, where a de-aged Harrison Ford delivers a performance that's supposed to be identical to what you've seen from the first three films. There's also Phoebe Waller-Bridge, a brilliant comic actor. There are hints that she will continue the franchise, if people want her to.

What we've seen


A lot of people consider Raiders of the Lost Ark to be one of the more perfect films of the late 20th century. I'll say, for a long time I was one of those people. But, although it's a loving homage to the serial films that came before it, it's not perfect. It's darn good and very entertaining, but it's weird and creaky in spots and sometimes it just loses the plot.

The next three films in the franchise were more or less well-regarded. Many considered 1984's Temple of Doom the best of the whole series. With today's lens, though, it suffers from some really uncomfortable racial stereotyping. I personally had little regard for the Last Crusade back in 1989, finding it a retread of the first film. Still, it's aged much better than other films in the series. We thought of 2008's Kingdom of the Crystal Skull as a dud in its initial release. I rewatched it a couple of months ago and found it was better than I remembered.

The bottom line, though, is that none of the succeeding films really ever captured the magic of the first one, and none succeeding in advancing the film's mythology past what we knew back in 1981. With another Nazi-heavy plot, it seems likely that Dial of Destiny won't move things forward either.

Yes I will see it anyway


There are very few franchises that people will pay to see even if they know they'll hate the film. Fast and the Furious, Star Wars, and Mission: Impossible movies come with some regularity and we all shell out the fifteen bucks to see them. We know we'll come out cranky and unsatisfied. But at this point that's sort of part of the fun.

I expect that when I leave the theater after having seen the latest Indiana Jones film, I'll shrug and say "meh, that was a way to spend three hours." I won't get all revved up like I did in 1981. But then again, I'm 42 years older and nothing is going to light me up like it did then. So I take the thrill ride I can take and move on.

But shouldn't we expect more?


For over a generation, we as a society have complained that "franchises" have ruined Hollywood and made it nearly impossible for new ideas to succeed. Obviously there is no greater example of this than the Marvel Cinematic Universe and its roughly 23 films of declining quality. Each film makes a ton of money even if it's not very good, and crowds out other more deserving films in the process. Then, as it's slowly petered out, it's left moviegoers wondering if they should even bother to go back to the theater.

Don't get me wrong folks. It's great for me that most successful films just recycle characters from my youth. But it's only going to get us so far. My rough guess is that over two-thirds of Americans living today weren't even born in 1981, never mind being old enough to see a movie. Where does it leave them? How engaged are they going to be at a retreaded franchise that started when their parents were kids?

At some point there will be a huge "snap" and moviemakers will stop catering to the childhoods of boomers and GenX. The real question is, will it be too late.

The destiny of Dial of Destiny


My gut tells me that a generation from now, film historians will look at Dial of Destiny as one of the last gasps of a movie franchise system that desperately needed to die. It will never be spoken of other than in that context. It, along with the Star Wars TV shows and the last films in the Fast franchise, will be pleasant memories. Still we will say they were doomed from the start. Not even a dial of destiny could save them.

Meanwhile, all I can say as I prepare to see the film is, please at least let me be entertained.

The post FUN(?) FRIDAY: Will Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny ruin my childhood? appeared first on The Solid Signal Blog.

Continue reading...
0 Replies · 281 views
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68658 Replies · 2680198 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
I Wanna Talk About Me - Toby Keith
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
gms49ers
It's Easy - Boston
RaiderPower
Take It Easy On Me - Little River Band
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 44 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 283 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
2 Replies · 50 views
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

2 Replies · 54 views
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Jimbo
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

They will have to look at the switching sections to determine WHY 2 trains were on the same track ... at the same time.
dishstaller
Thought this article might be of interest to some of you who might travel via train.