Social Feed

Stuart Sweet
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Solid Signal Blog
Remember when Netflix started producing original series? Their first original was called Lillyhammer back in 2012. These were the days when Netflix was known mostly as a company that sent DVDs in the mail. The streaming service was a free add-on that most people didn't use at the time.

When Lillyhammer debuted, it made sense that all of the episodes were available at once. After all, Netflix's other TV shows were all older so every episode was available at once. The company was at the forefront of bingewatching, a word which was so new at the time that most people didn't even know it. For many folks their first experience with bingeing was by renting a TV series like 24 at the local Blockbuster. Yes friends, it was a different time.

When new original series came out on streaming, they got a lot of press coverage for a few days. Then the public moved on to something else. This meant that a lot of the value of these shows was limited. People tended to forget them quickly once the buzz ended.

About six or seven years ago, streamers started releasing shows once a week just like traditional TV networks. This kept the excitement going for weeks at a time, which is what those companies wanted. But was it better for consumers?

Just my opinion folks


I thought it was a bad move to start releasing shows one episode at a time. I honestly figured that I'd just forget they existed. I'm the kind of person who relies on my DVR playlist to tell me what's available. I'm inclined to start a show and then forget about it if something else catches my eye. So I thought that if I didn't binge a whole show, I'd stop watching.

But you know what, I was wrong.

I actually found that watching one episode at a time is less stressful than watching all of them at once. A lot of these shows on streaming are pretty intense and honestly spending eight hours with them can be kind of draining. Watching an hour at a time makes a lot more sense to me.

There are still shows I lose track of, and sometimes it's on purpose. I, like many of you, was disappointed in Max's The Idol, and those episodes are going unwatched. If it had all dropped at once I'd probably have tried to binge it and probably would have wasted more time on it than I did.

In fact, I find that when a series does drop all at once, I still only watch one episode a week. I'm still watching Peacock's Based on a True Story because it works better as a weekly series than as a single event. It's rare that I'll binge an entire show at once. They're just too intense.

Apple TV has my back


OK, many of you know that I'm in the Apple ecosystem. And I have to tell you that one thing I like about Apple TV is that you can configure the Apple TV app itself to put your "Up Next" list at the top of the screen. It's easy.

Put the Apple TV app at the top left of your apps list. Then,

  • Open Settings on Apple TV.
  • Go to Apps > TV
  • Select what appears on the Home Screen when the Apple TV app is highlighted in the top row: Select "Top Shelf," then choose Up Next to see what's in your personal queue.

This is similar to the function I have with my DVR where I get a complete list of what I want to watch. Most apps work with it, although Netflix doesn't. Maybe someday they will.

Do you still binge?


I'm curious about how many people agree with me here. Do you think that it's better to have stuff come out on a weekly basis? Or would you rather it dropped all at once? Leave a comment below!

The post STREAMING SATURDAY: Once a week or all at once? appeared first on The Solid Signal Blog.

Continue reading...
1 Replies · 512 views
Jimbo
Personally, I prefer to binge it, have it available from Start to Finish, all there.
I may not watch All of it at the same time ...
Usually, I'll watch like 3-4 episodes at a time and potentially pick it up again the next day.

Shows like Stranger Things or Wednesday worked much better being able to watch as much as you wanted at once, vs one hour a week.

Just My Opinion ...
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68658 Replies · 2680179 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
I Wanna Talk About Me - Toby Keith
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
gms49ers
It's Easy - Boston
RaiderPower
Take It Easy On Me - Little River Band
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 43 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 282 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
2 Replies · 50 views
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

2 Replies · 53 views
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Jimbo
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

They will have to look at the switching sections to determine WHY 2 trains were on the same track ... at the same time.
dishstaller
Thought this article might be of interest to some of you who might travel via train.