Social Feed

Stuart Sweet
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Solid Signal Blog
According to a report from Cord Cutters News, Paramount, the parent of Showtime, is shutting down its "Showtime Anytime" app. It doesn't come as a surprise. I myself predicted it earlier this year. The big surprise is that if you get Showtime from your cable or satellite provider, forget about using an app to watch that content. It's not likely to happen.

The details

Screenshot-2023-11-15-080434-1024x315.png


According to a graphic posted on Showtime's site,

Showtime Anytime will shut down on 12/14/23. However, your subscription via your TV provider will remain active. Contact them to learn about other ways to watch SHOWTIME.

This is just the logical conclusion of Paramount's efforts to move all Showtime content to the Paramount+ app. So, if you want to stream Showtime content, Paramount+ is the only way to do it. And, that means paying $12 a month more than you're already paying for Showtime on live TV.

Honestly, this move makes HBO's decision to strip 4K content from its live TV customers seem almost charitable. But make no mistake, this is where it is all going. The days when you got free access to a streaming app just because you subscribed to live TV are coming to an end.

Why this is a jerk move


This move devalues cable and satellite at a time when the industry really needs a win. It takes away any incentive for people to subscribe to premium channels on cable or satellite, since the cost is often similar to streaming. Given the choice, many people would prefer to stream rather than watch programming on a fixed schedule. These companies know that and they are intentionally sticking it to their longtime partners.

But, like it or not, it's likely to be the wave of the future. I expect that when future contracts for HBO and Starz are negotiated, streaming apps will come out of the picture. It may happen slowly on a provider by provider basis, or it may be something that happens (in the ironic words of a film available on Showtime) everything everywhere all at once.

The good news is that you're really not losing anything


Even if you choose not to pay for Paramount+, you can still stream Showtime content, at least for now. Just look for it on the DIRECTV or DISH Anywhere apps. So far I've yet to find a Showtime program that isn't available through both provider apps on demand. That may change in the future as contracts are renegotiated, but you're safe for now… unless.

Unless?


Let's put our cards on the table here folks. There isn't a lot of content that's exclusive to Showtime. There are a few well-regarded original programs and you'll occasionally see a movie making its first streaming app appearance there. But it's not the firehose of content that you get from, say, Netflix.

So in that sense, losing Showtime isn't as big of a deal as it could be. However, Paramount could start moving their original content to be exclusive on their streaming app. They could still call it "Showtime" content even if it's not available on the live Showtime channels. Given that Paramount has already shown their willingness to be jerks about stuff, I wouldn't put it past them.

You have to wonder…


You have to wonder if this is really based in technology more than policy. When Paramount+ first launched as CBS All Access, it did offer a free tier that did little more than show you the live feed of your local CBS station and offer one or two episodes of top shows on demand. That capability hasn't really been spotlighted in recent years as Paramount+ tries to build itself an identity separate from CBS broadcast.

It may very well be that Paramount's engineers couldn't figure out a way to let cable and satellite providers get access to Showtime content without giving them access to the rest of the app. Or, they ran into a roadblock that they don't want to pay to break through. It could be as simple as that. Given the technical problems I've had with the standalone Showtime app over the years, I could really see it.

Buckle up


As I said, this is likely to be just one shot fired in an ongoing war between traditional pay-tv providers and those content makers who once relied on them. It's not going to be pretty and in the end, it's we the customers who will foot the bill.

For now, enjoy Showtime content on the DIRECTV and DISH apps if you subscribe to Showtime. You're still safe there.

The post Showtime app is going away, DIRECTV and DISH customers to be left out in the cold appeared first on The Solid Signal Blog.

Continue reading...
2 Replies · 483 views
harshness
When was the last time it made sense to pay for a premium movie service through an MVPD? I'm guessing that interval is measured in years.
Bruce
This move devalues cable and satellite at a time when the industry really needs a win. It takes away any incentive for people to subscribe to premium channels on cable or satellite, since the cost is often similar to streaming. Given the choice, many people would prefer to stream rather than watch programming on a fixed schedule. These companies know that and they are intentionally sticking it to their longtime partners.
They do not care.

And I honestly thought both Warner and Paramount would continue to offer access, charge the extra $4 for 4K on MAX, business as usual for Paramount since Showtime is the same price as P+ with Showtime.

2024/2025 will be massive transition in those two years, if all the plans hold, the industry will be totally different in 2026.
But, like it or not, it's likely to be the wave of the future. I expect that when future contracts for HBO and Starz are negotiated, streaming apps will come out of the picture. It may happen slowly on a provider by provider basis, or it may be something that happens (in the ironic words of a film available on Showtime) everything everywhere all at once.
I expect all TV Everywhere type apps to be gone quite soon, Fox Network was the first.
Even if you choose not to pay for Paramount+, you can still stream Showtime content, at least for now. Just look for it on the DIRECTV or DISH Anywhere apps. So far I've yet to find a Showtime program that isn't available through both provider apps on demand. That may change in the future as contracts are renegotiated, but you're safe for now… unless.
The advantage getting it via streaming is, get all the Paramount+ content, still get two Live Feeds of Showtime in 1080P/DD+ sound, a lot of the Showtime content that is On Demand is in 4K/Atmos, as is the Paramount+ content.

All for the same price of only Showtime via a Provider.
Let's put our cards on the table here folks. There isn't a lot of content that's exclusive to Showtime. There are a few well-regarded original programs and you'll occasionally see a movie making its first streaming app appearance there. But it's not the firehose of content that you get from, say, Netflix.
No it is not Netflix, but with the extra P+ content, makes it a better value.
It may very well be that Paramount's engineers couldn't figure out a way to let cable and satellite providers get access to Showtime content without giving them access to the rest of the app. Or, they ran into a roadblock that they don't want to pay to break through. It could be as simple as that. Given the technical problems I've had with the standalone Showtime app over the years, I could really see it.
No, they ( just like Warner) no longer wish to give a percentage ( per sub fee) to the Live TV Provider anymore, unless the fee is not that much.

When the contract with Warner is up, expect the next deal involving HBO to no longer include MAX access.

I have read that the deal with HBO is Warner gets 70%, Provider gets 30%, which is $4.50.

Now I do not know how many sub to MAX directly or via a provider, but if it is 20 Million via Live TV, that means at $4.50 a month, that is $90 Million a month for the per sub fee, $1.08 Billion a year.

So, of course, with all of Warner's debt issues, they will want to keep that for themselves.
As I said, this is likely to be just one shot fired in an ongoing war between traditional pay-tv providers and those content makers who once relied on them. It's not going to be pretty and in the end, it's we the customers who will foot the bill.
Going to get a lot worse.

Wait till ESPN goes streaming in late 2024/ early 2025, it will be open warfare between streaming and Traditional Providers.
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68658 Replies · 2680179 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
I Wanna Talk About Me - Toby Keith
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
gms49ers
It's Easy - Boston
RaiderPower
Take It Easy On Me - Little River Band
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 43 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 282 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
2 Replies · 50 views
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

2 Replies · 53 views
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Jimbo
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

They will have to look at the switching sections to determine WHY 2 trains were on the same track ... at the same time.
dishstaller
Thought this article might be of interest to some of you who might travel via train.