vurbano said:
A third of the Picture resolution thrown away, the bitrate reduced and the leftovers blown up to 106" and you cant see a difference. Do you watch through coke bottle glasses?
Isn't it interesting that the dozens of folks who have seen D*TV HD in my setup have agreed to a person that the HD PQ is the "best they've ever seen".
While none of them was duped into the Voom fiasco, they all do represent Comcrap, Dish, and Charter with their own HD setups, and 4-5 of them are running over 100K in HD projectors and video enhancers. In the case of the cable HD broadcast comparisons, the PQ advantage of D*TV isn't even close - D*TV wins hands down.
In case you are interested, HD is defined as 720p and 1080i resolutions, both of which are supported by D*TV. With knock-your-socks-off PQ, I am not only very happy with their HD, I am thrilled - and so is everyone else who sees it here.
Like anything else, PQ can be a subjective thing, but when you have over 2 dozen people agree 100% on seeing the same thing, there's some substance behind it. Just yesterday, while watching the 1st half of MNF on ABC HD at one of my neighbor's HT locations (with a $40,000 three eyed monster projector that was just ISF tuned), the PQ wasn't even in the same league. I went home and saw the second half in my HT, and loved it - far better PQ (and sound for that matter).
Would it be nice to reduce the downrezzing, sure, but that will be addressed via the new MPEG4 stuff and the increased D*TV bandwidth/capacity.
Sorry to hear you are not happy with your PQ, but life (and HD viewing) is great on this side of the HD fence, and its only going to get better....
Happy holidays.