Social Feed

Poke
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/22/commentary/sportsbiz/index.htm?source=yahoo_quote


nfl_network.gif




The NFL Network, which will show its first live football game Thursday night, isn't available even in most homes with cable.
A weekly column by Chris Isidore, CNNMoney.com senior writer
November 22 2006: 7:50 AM EST


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Thanksgiving, a day given to excess, will include a third helping of pro football this year -- but only for a fraction of U.S. homes.

When the NFL Network, owned by the National Football League,shows its first live regular season game Thursday evening with the Denver Broncos facing off against the Kansas City Chiefs, only about 13 million of 70 million cable households will be able to see the game.



Cable operators such as Time Warner Cable are so far bucking the NFL Network's demand to offer the network to its customers at no additional fee.


Such a diet seems downright un-American for the holiday second only to Super Bowl Sunday in its attention to the National Football League.

The limited distribution of the game was even examined at a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Fortunately for the future of democracy, CBS and Fox will each air a game earlier in the day, as will local broadcast affiliates in Denver and Kansas City.

The two leading satellite television firms have reached a deal to carry the NFL Network. But several of the largest cable operators, including No. 2 Time Warner Cable, No. 4 Charter Communications (Charts) and Cablevision (Charts), have not signed deals to carry the network. Time Warner Cable and CNNMoney.com are both units of Time Warner (Charts).

And some of the large cable operators that are offering the network, including No. 1 Comcast (Charts) and No. 3 Cox, are making it available only to customers who have more expensive digital cable services and who also have subscribed to a special package of channels for which they have to pay an additional fee.

The NFL Network signed those deals with Comcast and Cox before the league decided to put a package of eight Thursday night and Saturday night games on its network this season.

At that point, when its live offerings were limited to pre-season and NFL Europe games, it was tough to push for prime placement for the network, or get the top-dollar per-subscriber fees from cable operators it is now seeking.

Now the league believes it deserves to be offered to as broad a range of a cable systems' customers as possible. The league is said to be asking for a fee of 70 cents a month per subscriber, a rate that is seen by cable companies as too pricey. In fact it's more than just about any non-sports cable network gets paid.

The NFL Network also doesn't want its audience to be restricted by being placed on a more expensive bundle of networks with other sports channels like NBA TV either.

Monday Night Football a financial winner for ESPN
"We're willing to do a deal that's fair for our fans that doesn't involve extra fees being passed along to subscribers," said NFL Network spokesman Seth Palansky.

So while just about all 25 million satellite television customers of News Corp's DirecTV Group (Charts) and EchoStar Communications' (Charts) Dish Network will be able to watch the game, only a fraction of cable customers will be able to tune in.

The NFL Network clearly hoped to have many more viewers by this point. Some experts expected the network to be available in 70 million households by the kickoff of the network's first live telecast on Thanksgiving. But so far, most cable companies have held firm at the negotiating table.

"Short of the eight out-of-market games that run over six weeks, the rest of the network is niche programming so only fans need to pay for it," said Time Warner Cable spokesman Mark Harrad. "They want prime channel space at top dollar. They want us to pay another $140 million a year for games we carried last year on other networks."

Harrad claims that customer objection to not having the service has been minimal. But the NFL Network is clearly hoping that once fans realize they are missing out on games, they'll push the cable companies to strike a deal.

"My hope is that you and the rest of the subscribers in Time Warner's footprint call up Time Warner and say: We want you to have a relationship with the NFL Network," said Steve Bornstein, CEO of the network, when questioned by a New York City-based reporter during a recent press call.

Why you hate 'Monday Night Football.'
Bornstein fought many of these same battles when he was a top executive at ESPN in its early days, and when that network used its first NFL games in 1987 to expand its reach. He clearly thinks the NFL has the might to win this battle again, the way ESPN once did.

Experts in the field believe that eventually the NFL Network and cable operators will find terms that they both can accept. Although it may take a season or two, along with additional growth of digital cable, to make it happen.

"It's the way these things usually work their way out -- ultimately they negotiate and battle and reach a price," said sports television consultant Lee Berke. "The reality is this is very compelling programming."

Until then, many football fans who want to get that extra helping of football on Thanksgiving and seven other days a year will have to get a dish -- a satellite dish that is.
3 Replies · 1886 views
C
I consider myself a pretty serious football fan, not to the point of needing or wanting Sunday Ticket, but I will watch any NFL game that's on. For me, NFL Network is one of my most watched (if not the #1) cable channels. I couldn't do without it, and since Time Warner is my cable provider, if I ever decide to leave Dish, it would limit my options.
dishcomm
http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/22/commentary/sportsbiz/index.htm?source=yahoo_quote


nfl_network.gif




The NFL Network, which will show its first live football game Thursday night, isn't available even in most homes with cable.
A weekly column by Chris Isidore, CNNMoney.com senior writer
November 22 2006: 7:50 AM EST


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Thanksgiving, a day given to excess, will include a third helping of pro football this year -- but only for a fraction of U.S. homes.

When the NFL Network, owned by the National Football League,shows its first live regular season game Thursday evening with the Denver Broncos facing off against the Kansas City Chiefs, only about 13 million of 70 million cable households will be able to see the game.



Cable operators such as Time Warner Cable are so far bucking the NFL Network's demand to offer the network to its customers at no additional fee.


Such a diet seems downright un-American for the holiday second only to Super Bowl Sunday in its attention to the National Football League.

The limited distribution of the game was even examined at a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Fortunately for the future of democracy, CBS and Fox will each air a game earlier in the day, as will local broadcast affiliates in Denver and Kansas City.

The two leading satellite television firms have reached a deal to carry the NFL Network. But several of the largest cable operators, including No. 2 Time Warner Cable, No. 4 Charter Communications (Charts) and Cablevision (Charts), have not signed deals to carry the network. Time Warner Cable and CNNMoney.com are both units of Time Warner (Charts).

And some of the large cable operators that are offering the network, including No. 1 Comcast (Charts) and No. 3 Cox, are making it available only to customers who have more expensive digital cable services and who also have subscribed to a special package of channels for which they have to pay an additional fee.

The NFL Network signed those deals with Comcast and Cox before the league decided to put a package of eight Thursday night and Saturday night games on its network this season.

At that point, when its live offerings were limited to pre-season and NFL Europe games, it was tough to push for prime placement for the network, or get the top-dollar per-subscriber fees from cable operators it is now seeking.

Now the league believes it deserves to be offered to as broad a range of a cable systems' customers as possible. The league is said to be asking for a fee of 70 cents a month per subscriber, a rate that is seen by cable companies as too pricey. In fact it's more than just about any non-sports cable network gets paid.

The NFL Network also doesn't want its audience to be restricted by being placed on a more expensive bundle of networks with other sports channels like NBA TV either.

Monday Night Football a financial winner for ESPN
"We're willing to do a deal that's fair for our fans that doesn't involve extra fees being passed along to subscribers," said NFL Network spokesman Seth Palansky.

So while just about all 25 million satellite television customers of News Corp's DirecTV Group (Charts) and EchoStar Communications' (Charts) Dish Network will be able to watch the game, only a fraction of cable customers will be able to tune in.

The NFL Network clearly hoped to have many more viewers by this point. Some experts expected the network to be available in 70 million households by the kickoff of the network's first live telecast on Thanksgiving. But so far, most cable companies have held firm at the negotiating table.

"Short of the eight out-of-market games that run over six weeks, the rest of the network is niche programming so only fans need to pay for it," said Time Warner Cable spokesman Mark Harrad. "They want prime channel space at top dollar. They want us to pay another $140 million a year for games we carried last year on other networks."

Harrad claims that customer objection to not having the service has been minimal. But the NFL Network is clearly hoping that once fans realize they are missing out on games, they'll push the cable companies to strike a deal.

"My hope is that you and the rest of the subscribers in Time Warner's footprint call up Time Warner and say: We want you to have a relationship with the NFL Network," said Steve Bornstein, CEO of the network, when questioned by a New York City-based reporter during a recent press call.

Why you hate 'Monday Night Football.'
Bornstein fought many of these same battles when he was a top executive at ESPN in its early days, and when that network used its first NFL games in 1987 to expand its reach. He clearly thinks the NFL has the might to win this battle again, the way ESPN once did.

Experts in the field believe that eventually the NFL Network and cable operators will find terms that they both can accept. Although it may take a season or two, along with additional growth of digital cable, to make it happen.

"It's the way these things usually work their way out -- ultimately they negotiate and battle and reach a price," said sports television consultant Lee Berke. "The reality is this is very compelling programming."

Until then, many football fans who want to get that extra helping of football on Thanksgiving and seven other days a year will have to get a dish -- a satellite dish that is.

Leave to the dregs at CNN for another wah wah story....The way I see it, there is nothing different here....The KC/Den game tomorrow night is available in-market via locals in those cities....Those who live outside those areas are getting the traditional Dallas and Detroit home games....All NFL ST subs are getting the game as well because they have NFL network anyway..as do Dish subs...The NFL network will catch on with other cable systems..eventually...
B
All NFL ST subs are getting the game as well because they have NFL network anyway

You don't have to be a Sunday Ticket subscriber to get the Chiefs-Broncos game. The NFL Network is available to any Total Choice customer.
ewindowman
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Looks like dish is Bankrupt. Filling tomorrow Tuesday June 30th
471 Replies · 16738 views
comfortably_numb

Too bad their service is expensive and their coverage sucks compared to the other two of the Big 3
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Juan
Too bad their service is expensive and their coverage sucks compared to the other two of the Big 3
Was that a back door compliment for Verizon?
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dishstaller
Meanwhile att is getting rid of overseas call centers

Too little too late.

I can actually shed some light on the corp attitude towards call centers.

2015-2017 I was on the Viasat Dealer Council. They would fly us out to CO or CA and wine and dine us. Pretty cool but I was there to give my input because I was a top retailer and I wanted things to improve.
Anyway, at one of the meetings I brought up the fact that customers constantly complained about the overseas call centers. The VP of the company told me that I just didn't understand....those people cost something like 25% of what US employees would cost. Well, as usual when I went out to these meetings, I was loaded for bear....ie facts. I gave them an example of a customer who spent over an hour with one of these call centers and still never got her issue resolved. She called me the next morning after we opened and I had her situation fixed in 2 minutes. I told him "So you guys paid this overseas call center X amount but the customer still wasn't taken care of. I on the other hand, and a US call center probably would have as well because there wouldn't have been the language barrier, had her taken care of in 2 min. so your savings just went right out the door because a US call center would have taken care of her and MANY other customers while your overseas call center did nothing more than PISS off a customer.
Blank stares was all I got.

And THAT was when I realized just how incompetent most of the people are who run these companies. It WAS an enlightening experience.
Almighty1
Even 23 years ago, Verizon was known for having quality customer service. T-Mobile had quality customer service too but just poor mobile service. AT&T when it was still known as AT&T Wireless, Cingular Wireless both had poor customer service. This was when all three were providing customer service from the U.S. so even in the U.S., some companies are still better than others as it still depends on who they hire. That's the same reason AT&T Broadband Inc. which was basically their Cable TV never gotten far and got sold to Comcast.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
comfortably_numb
And THAT was when I realized just how incompetent most of the people are who run these companies

I wouldn't call it incompetence necessarily, it's just that the customer is only a device now, the old idea that you need to spend money to make money has been forgotten. They're not looking at the long game. They're looking at immediate exposure and shareholder value. Spending a lot of money on local call centers might be a good long term investment, but it doesn't do anything for them in the short term. That's what the blank stares were about, they thought YOU didn't get it.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
comfortably_numb
Was that a back door compliment for Verizon?

And TMO. If anybody's lagging behind the most, it's ATT.
ERSanders
The short term financial thinking by MBAs is what killed Xerox. Ask me how I know!
navychop
So you have a MBA?
:devilish
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68798 Replies · 2689242 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
H
FIND Your Way Back-Jefferson Starship
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
ClarkGable
Working My Way Back To You - The Four Seasons
dishstaller
Don't Look Back - Boston
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
harshness
Please Come to Boston - Dave Loggins
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Bobby
Come A Little Bit Closer - Jay and the Americans
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Stumbled across this ... http://www.gaspricewatch.com/USGas_ZipSearch.asp
I found no local prices, although it did show stations at my location...
Added these to this post...
USA National Gas Temperature Map
State By State Gasoline Taxes
Gas Buddy

Ethanol Free Stations

5574 Replies · 463192 views
Bobby
Regular$5.299​
Premium$5.859​
Diesel$7.599​
at Costco, Rohnert Park.​
harshness
Finally! Some big movement in California diesel pricing (and no, there is no such beastie as a diesel "winter formula").

Crude (combined pricing) is around $90/barrel now, so prices should have, at least, fallen in step with the crude futures.
dishstaller
Finally! Some big movement in California diesel pricing (and no, there is no such beastie as a diesel "winter formula").
Just curious here.....then why is diesel so much higher out there than it is elsewhere. Bobby just posted $7.59/gal, locally it is $5.59.....that's two bucks difference. :eeek
harshness
Just curious here.....then why is diesel so much higher out there than it is elsewhere.
California has a ~93¢ per gallon consumer tax rate on automotive diesel, along with significantly higher refinement standards.

The fact that consumers can only buy some new full-sized truck models and a couple of vans with diesel power makes the fuel an odd duck in refinery priorities.
osu1991
$3.50-$3.52 around Tulsa and $3.45 in OKC
T
· posted in Cable Television and Fiber Providers
The Charter/Spectrum tv app has been updated to make it downloaded with more tv brands. I recently added it to my LG Oled tv.
0 Replies · 16 views
Bobby
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
This thread is a place to discuss the 4K events that appear on channel 540. We are getting, at this point, one college football game a week. Let's hope there is more coming.
1938 Replies · 302195 views
long_time_Dish
No NASCAR in 4K on Sunday? Bummer...
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Jim5506
No NASCAR in 4K on Sunday? Bummer...
It's on Prime.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
long_time_Dish
It's on Prime.
Ah, ok, thanks!
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Foxbat
The World Series Game 1 quality was excellent, the Dolby Surround put us in the seats. Thanks, Dish!
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
Not seeing many 4k games on the 148 channels lately?

Also I do not see the 4KFox channel on 148-01; I also do not subscribed to our Local Houston channels.

Maybe I need to subscribe to locals or add the National Action Pack? Not sure the extra cost is worth it??

thx for any info or suggestions

S
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
jsmit86
Not seeing many 4k games on the 148 channels lately?

Also I do not see the 4KFox channel on 148-01; I also do not subscribed to our Local Houston channels.

Maybe I need to subscribe to locals or add the National Action Pack? Not sure the extra cost is worth it??

thx for any info or suggestions

S
Most of the 4K action on the 148-xx channels will be on Saturday for College Football. For whatever reason, the guide does not show the games until later in the week. The Fox Big Noon game will show up, and there will usually be a couple of other games, some on Fox, and some on ESPN.

I don't know if you need to be subscribed to locals to get them.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
· posted in The Chit Chat Club
Now after reading this story I walked away thinking that this is being blown out of proportion because of the incredibly low numbers of those affected.....BUT....I've read posts by some of you who are taking this drug so I figured it was worth posting.

0 Replies · 22 views
KAB
KAB
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
· posted in Movie Talk
Not a bit surprised.

0 Replies · 26 views