Article, Direct TV against ATSC 3

[MartyDe]

Saw this article about Direct TV's objections to ATSC3.

DIRECTV Objects to ATSC 3.0 OTA TV | Cord Cutters News

The American Television Alliance (ATA), representing pay TV and telecom providers, has raised significant concerns with the Federal Communications Commission’s Media Bureau about the costly transition to NextGenTV/ATSC 3.0, particularly for one of its key members, DirecTV. In a detailed letter...

cordcuttersnews.com

 

[comfortably_numb]

There's no 3.0 mandate, so why does DTV even care?

 

[navychop]

Because there are rumblings to force it by 2030 or some such date.

 

[Scott Greczkowski]

There's no 3.0 mandate, so why does DTV even care?

They are trying to get one passed.

ATSC 3.0 is a mess. Especially when you add DRM into the mix.

 

[comfortably_numb]

The only viable options as I see them are-

1. Mandate 3.0 but eliminate DRM encryption;

or

2. Sunset 3.0 and leave 1.0 as-is

PLEASE LOG IN TO GET RID OF THESE ADS!

 

[FTA4PA]

The only viable options as I see them are-

1. Mandate 3.0 but eliminate DRM encryption;

or

2. Sunset 3.0 and leave 1.0 as-is

Either 1 or 2 works for me. The DRM money grab makes it a non-starter IMHO.

 

[navychop]

WHAT? No 5G!

Oh, the Horror!

 

[Radioguy41]

ATSC 3.0 is a solution in search of a problem. Totally unnecessary and unneeded.

 

[Joe The Dragon]

only allow DRM on pay channels and force the FREE channels to have no DRM

 

[comfortably_numb]

only allow DRM on pay channels

Ah! But should there be pay OTA channels??

PLEASE LOG IN TO GET RID OF THESE ADS!

 

[Joe The Dragon]

Ah! But should there be pay OTA channels??

They can try it that again

 

[navychop]

only allow DRM on pay channels and force the FREE channels to have no DRM

Then all channels will become pay channels.