I thought some of you all might find this interesting:
Sixteen of the nation's top constitutional law scholars...believe that an Ohio Court of Appeals ruling upholding a satellite TV tax would dramatically erode Constitutional protections from discriminatory state regulation.
In a "friend of the court" brief filed with the Ohio Supreme Court, the scholars
firmly supported DIRECTV`s and DISH Network`s position that Ohio's discriminatory tax treatment of satellite TV violates the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States.
Nation`s Top Constitutional Law Scholars Believe Ohio Satellite TV Tax Ruling is Flawed | Reuters
Sixteen of the nation's top constitutional law scholars...believe that an Ohio Court of Appeals ruling upholding a satellite TV tax would dramatically erode Constitutional protections from discriminatory state regulation.
In a "friend of the court" brief filed with the Ohio Supreme Court, the scholars
firmly supported DIRECTV`s and DISH Network`s position that Ohio's discriminatory tax treatment of satellite TV violates the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States.
Nation`s Top Constitutional Law Scholars Believe Ohio Satellite TV Tax Ruling is Flawed | Reuters
