a 2006 Dodge Charger?i've personally seen a 1969 shelby mustang take a dodge charger by a long shot . personally i would never take a charger over a shelby mustang. not even todays models but hey that's just me baby
Must not have been a V8 then.
Cars Cars Cars
- Thread starter Hemi 6.1
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 123
- Views 17K
- Status
Must not have been a V8 then.
a 2006 Dodge Charger?
Hemi they were both 1969 models. v8's
2008 models
Charger :
Base Number of Cylinders: 8
Base Engine Size: 6.1 liters
Base Engine Type: V8
Horsepower: 425 hp
Torque: 420 ft-lbs.
Drive Type: RWD
Shelby Mustang:
Base Number of Cylinders: 8
Base Engine Size : 5.4 liters
Base Engine Type: V8
Horsepower: 540 hp
Torque: 510 ft-lbs.
Drive Type: RWD
Charger :
Base Number of Cylinders: 8
Base Engine Size: 6.1 liters
Base Engine Type: V8
Horsepower: 425 hp
Torque: 420 ft-lbs.
Drive Type: RWD
Shelby Mustang:
Base Number of Cylinders: 8
Base Engine Size : 5.4 liters
Base Engine Type: V8
Horsepower: 540 hp
Torque: 510 ft-lbs.
Drive Type: RWD
Not really much of a challenge for the Charger With a Top speed of 134 MPH . Maybe that Mustang and a Camry V6.I bet Top end the 270 HP Camry will eat that Shelby.
Show me a Picture of a Yanko Camaro, Or ZL1 then we'll Talk.
I don't care if it's fast. If I look good in it, then the women flock to me. LOL
I don't care if it's fast. If I look good in it, then the women flock to me. LOL
hemi and I are just having fun
and yes you're right that's how i feel. i have a car like that why would i want to race it and destroy it? gotta take care of her like the ladies I'm just mad cus I don't have one. And the 69 Charger yes most likly got beat.. I had a 1970 with a Hemi it ran 0-60 5.5 was the best I could get it and 129 Top speed with a 4 speed. The HEMI Cuda was the fast Mopars. I've heard of them running under 5 seconds 60 though. I've not seen one yet.
And the 69 Charger yes most likly got beat.. I had a 1970 with a Hemi it ran 0-60 5.5 was the best I could get it and 129 Top speed with a 4 speed. The HEMI Cuda was the fast Mopars. I've heard of them running under 5 seconds 60 though. I've not seen one yet.Yea. Well thats Ford , Slap a Super Charger on everything you can.
To bad a 436 HP Corvette can beat it.
I guess, But they are worth big $$$$ too. The Cars I mean.I don't care if it's fast. If I look good in it, then the women flock to me. LOL
Yea. Well thats Ford , Slap a Super Charger on everything you can.
To bad a 436 HP Corvette can beat it.
my old man has a yellow 2005 corvette Z06. and you're right they are at a different level than the other cars we're talking about.
this is one of my favorite cars of all time. 1967 shelby mustang
man she's got a sweet ass
These are better.
All this talk of performance figures based on bias ply tires on a car that was ostensibly designed for racing on a road course...
Truth be known, the GT350 may give the GT500 a hard time depending on the circumstances.
BTW, Hemi, it was the YEnko Camaro.
Truth be known, the GT350 may give the GT500 a hard time depending on the circumstances.
BTW, Hemi, it was the YEnko Camaro.
It looks a hell of a lot better than these new cars, hell they look better than any car.
I tend to like the stock looking cars more. All of that flash and wild paint does nothing for me, and does nothing for my driving experience. Just my opinion though.
These are better.
How the hell did you get your cars to the 2nd floor of your house???
how many cars do you have cybok0???? damn!!!!
How the hell did you get your cars to the 2nd floor of your house???
Come on Rey, the stairs are right there.....
Agree. I like stock right from the factory, Or atleast a few Bolt ons . But Don't care for Superchargers. No thought involved slapping on a Supercharger.
I've seen Faster GT 350 Mustangs First hand. 428 and 429 are Just big Heavy Pigs.
- Status
Similar threads
