DIRECTV Is Starting to Downplay Satellite in Favor of DIRECTV NOW

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Support Forum' started by bruce, Apr 12, 2017.

  1. agape56

    agape56 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2014
    Posts:
    5
    Likes Received:
    3
    Some of you are not seeing the positive point of Directv Now and other providers.
    1) There are no commitment snares. (No 2-year clause)
    2) No equipment to buy or lease.
    3) Cheaper than regular cable/satellite. (Got the $35 promo and it is just to good to be true. When I had DTV sat. service, I paid $45 in fees alone.)
     
    Gobucks likes this.
  2. *** WELCOME TO SATELLITEGUYS! ***
  3. DS0816

    DS0816 SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Posts:
    498
    Likes Received:
    36
    What about data caps?

    Perhaps I am the only one here who has that.
     
  4. Claude Greiner

    Claude Greiner SatelliteGuys Master
    Supporting Founder

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2003
    Posts:
    10,384
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Location:
    Detroit - The Paris of the Midwest
    Until every household in America has access to fiber, Directv service via satellite is not going away any time soon.
     
    navychop likes this.
  5. Jillian2

    Jillian2 Well-Known SatelliteGuys Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2015
    Posts:
    28
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    USA
    I certainly don't. All I have is AT&T Fast Access DSL 6.0 with 150 gb data cap. So slow it's pathetic .


    Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
     
  6. Jimbo

    Jimbo SatelliteGuys Master
    Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Posts:
    57,800
    Likes Received:
    1,599
    Location:
    NW Ohio - Buckeye Country
    Remember when fast use to be 1.5 ?
    6.0 isn't so bad when you put it in perspective .... then when you look at what's available in some areas, it's quite slow.

    If your a gamer, I can understand, I'm not.

    I currently have 50 mg, but that's only because the company I'm with only has 1 stinking option below that. ... and that's 10 mg. Which is more than the 6.0, but from 50 to 10 and nothing in between, that's ridiculous.

    My company went from 8 to 10, 12, 15, 18, 22 and 26, before jumping to 50.
    Raising rates almost 5 dollars each time. ... while not giving the customer the option to stay.

    Told them I would be fine with 15 or 20, they said they don't have it, even though I previously had it.
     
  7. Jillian2

    Jillian2 Well-Known SatelliteGuys Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2015
    Posts:
    28
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    USA
    I'm not a gamer.


    Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
     
  8. Jillian2

    Jillian2 Well-Known SatelliteGuys Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2015
    Posts:
    28
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    USA
    We have a locally owned cable company called ComSouth. It has DSL in some areas and fiber to the premises in other areas. It's fiber where I live but I think it cost too much compared to the big guys , so I stay with ATT.
    http://comsouth.net/services/internet/


    Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
     
  9. ewindowman

    ewindowman SatelliteGuys Pro
    Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Posts:
    407
    Likes Received:
    239
    I Have Fios and looked at the channel lineup with all streaming services . I think I will be staying with dish and Verizon .
     
  10. dishcomm

    dishcomm SatelliteGuys Master

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Posts:
    10,354
    Likes Received:
    522
    Location:
    suburbia
    Ok people. One more time.....Satellite cannot be replaced with streaming. Impossible.
    The reason is simple. The type of broadband service whether viz wire line or over the cell network will not be available for most of the country for years to come.
    The costs are staggering.
    Think about the investment the ISP's and cell carriers would have to make in order to provide the necessary capacity....That cost would be passed along to the consumers who DO have access.
    And that would drive many people out of the marketplace. Those that could not afford to absorb what would essentially be a subsidy would either shut down their service( less likely) or down grade to a lower level to dave money( more likely) . Cell carriers and ISP's would see huge losses. That's not going to happen.
    So all this hand wringing about the disappearance of satellite tv is unwarranted.
     
    antimoz, reddice and SpaethCo like this.
  11. Jimbo

    Jimbo SatelliteGuys Master
    Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Posts:
    57,800
    Likes Received:
    1,599
    Location:
    NW Ohio - Buckeye Country
    I agree that Sat TV isn't going anywhere, however, att is working on getting new internet service to you ....
     
    Jillian2 likes this.
  12. Jillian2

    Jillian2 Well-Known SatelliteGuys Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2015
    Posts:
    28
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    USA
    That's why I stay with ATT for internet service . I believe that they will upgrade it in my area at some point


    Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
     
  13. IcEWoLF

    IcEWoLF SatelliteGuys Master
    Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Posts:
    6,692
    Likes Received:
    2,941
    Location:
    Nevada
    AT&T is slowly phasing out U-Verse so they can free up bandwidth, at the same time they are expanding their gigabyte internet connection, but I doubt that will expand any faster at this rate, its gonna take at least a decade to increase that foot print and take away people from cable internet to gigabyte.

    BTW AT&T lost more customers this last QT, this is several qt in a row they lost hundreds of thousands of customers with their wireless service. They are hurting big time.

    T-Mobile has been putting the hurt on Verizon & AT&T. Verizon this last QT has seen a staggering amount of customers cancelling and moving on to T-Mobile or Sprint.
    AT&T on the other hand stopped caring about their Wireless customers.
     
  14. Jimbo

    Jimbo SatelliteGuys Master
    Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Posts:
    57,800
    Likes Received:
    1,599
    Location:
    NW Ohio - Buckeye Country
    Looks like Verizon has as well.
     
  15. IcEWoLF

    IcEWoLF SatelliteGuys Master
    Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Posts:
    6,692
    Likes Received:
    2,941
    Location:
    Nevada
    Love how Verizon CEO backtracked about the Unlimited data.
    I am happy T-Mobile is forcing these large providers hands.
     
  16. Jimbo

    Jimbo SatelliteGuys Master
    Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    Posts:
    57,800
    Likes Received:
    1,599
    Location:
    NW Ohio - Buckeye Country
    Doesn't T-Mobile use others cell towers ?
     
  17. IcEWoLF

    IcEWoLF SatelliteGuys Master
    Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Posts:
    6,692
    Likes Received:
    2,941
    Location:
    Nevada
    They have their own, but in some of the areas they use other GSM providers I believe... they recently bought more spectrum, when they start rolling it out later on this year their coverage is going to be the 2nd best in the nation, I believe its the 600mhz spectrum (low band) so they can go further, and improve reception inside buildings, which T-Mobile has been struggling for years.
    https://newsroom.t-mobile.com/news-and-blogs/tmobile-spectrum-auction-win.htm
     
  18. ncted

    ncted SatelliteGuys Pro
    Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Posts:
    2,025
    Likes Received:
    475
    Location:
    Durham, NC
    AT&T and Verizon are going to start to compete (and already are to some extent) on price with T-Mo and Sprint. AT&T is ahead of VZW in preparing for that by having other revenue streams, like DirecTV and Time Warner (soon). I still couldn't actually get a T-Mobile or Sprint signal in half of the rural places I visit, while AT&T is usually there, and, to be honest, I am really only paying a few bucks more than I would on the cheaper carriers, albeit for less data, but it is plenty of data for my needs. I could switch back to Verizon, but then I wouldn't have service where my parents live in upstate NY.

    Anyway, I think Satellite isn't going anywhere for a long time, but I do see streaming services like DTVN growing substantially over time, especially as wireless and broadband internet capacity continues to grow. If they don't grow fast enough, then the service quality will suffer, and they will lose customers, so it is in AT&T's interest to make the experience acceptable.
     
  19. camo

    camo SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Posts:
    605
    Likes Received:
    186
    Location:
    Nebraska/Arizona
    You don't need fiber to stream. Last time I checked using H.264v (MPEG-4 AVC) codec Directv Now was under 3 Mbps and PSvue was almost double at 5 Mbps. Data caps is another issue however.
     
  20. mdram

    mdram SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Posts:
    3,361
    Likes Received:
    396
    Location:
    Md
    4k would require much higher @ 25Mbs
     
  21. navychop

    navychop Member of the Month - July 2014!
    Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Posts:
    42,165
    Likes Received:
    7,269
    Location:
    Northern VA
    Doesn't T hold a lot of spectrum they lease out rather than use themselves?
     



***

Separate names with a comma.

More...