DISH, Cable Press for News Corp./DirecTV Conditions (1 Viewer)

Status
Please reply by conversation.

silversurfer

Thread Starter
Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Sep 8, 2003
1,147
1
Las Vegas, Nevada
From our friendas at SkyReport.com

Companies eyeing News Corp.'s pending takeover of Hughes and DirecTV are pressing their concerns at the Federal Communications Commission, including issues they have with carriage of programming controlled by News Corp. and proposed remedies to address their fears.

In a 45-page letter sent to the commission, EchoStar praised a proposed condition that would force News Corp. and Fox to provide programming to a pay-TV provider while a carriage dispute is in arbitration. "In EchoStar's view, an arbitration condition would lack teeth if it did not include a requirement that MVPDs (multichannel video providers) be allowed to continue carrying the programming in question while the dispute is arbitrated," the company said.

EchoStar added, "The absence of regional sports or the local network station from an MVPD's package, even for a short period of time, has a debilitating effect on that distributor's ability to compete in the region in question."

In another development, executives with some of the nation's biggest cable companies recently visited the FCC to discuss the deal. Cox President and CEO James Robbins, Insight CEO Michael Willner, Patrick Butler of the Washington Post Company and other MSO representatives met with two commissioners: Jonathan Adelstein and Kathleen Abernathy.

Just like EchoStar, the company executives expressed concern with News Corp.'s control of a platform provider and its programming slate, and stressed the need for remedies that address "post-transaction incentives to withhold or threaten to withhold must-have Fox programming." That content includes Fox regional sports nets and broadcast stations.

The FCC is expected to issue a decision soon on the News Corp./DirecTV deal, and is rumored to be ready to grant approval of the transaction with conditions.
 

BobMurdoch

Playing XBoxOne/Supporter
Supporting Founder
Sep 12, 2003
5,767
188
Brielle, NJ
Meanwhile here in NJ, E* continues to refuse to carry YES which has the Yankees and Nets and will soon have the Devils.

C'Mon Charlie, get me YES and I can get another 3 Yankee fans to sign up for Club Dish. Fail to do that, and they will eventually go to D* (They are still (shudder) cable subscribers).
 

rtt2

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Sep 8, 2003
903
0
I want YES too and will gladlly give up MSG & FSNY
 

dlsnyder

SatelliteGuys Pro
Sep 8, 2003
1,825
3
Moreno Valley, CA
In a 45-page letter sent to the commission, EchoStar praised a proposed condition that would force News Corp. and Fox to provide programming to a pay-TV provider while a carriage dispute is in arbitration. "In EchoStar's view, an arbitration condition would lack teeth if it did not include a requirement that MVPDs (multichannel video providers) be allowed to continue carrying the programming in question while the dispute is arbitrated," the company said.

EchoStar added, "The absence of regional sports or the local network station from an MVPD's package, even for a short period of time, has a debilitating effect on that distributor's ability to compete in the region in question."

Yet on the other hand Charlie is more than willing to cut off channels to make a point in the event of a dispute. He just wants to hobble D* with restrictions he doesn't have to abide by. SHEESH!
 

dlsnyder

SatelliteGuys Pro
Sep 8, 2003
1,825
3
Moreno Valley, CA
It just seems like Charlie has always advocated the opposite position. In the event of a dispute he either cuts off or threatens to cut off channels as leverage. It sounds like he is saying here that it's OK for him to decide not to air the channels but not OK for them to pull them in the event of a dispute. How fair is that?
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Users who are viewing this thread

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Latest posts

Top