Dish/DirectTv-The merger Talk That Won't Die

  • WELCOME TO THE NEW SERVER!

    If you are seeing this you are on our new server WELCOME HOME!

    While the new server is online Scott is still working on the backend including the cachine. But the site is usable while the work is being completes!

    Thank you for your patience and again WELCOME HOME!

    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE
Naw the new Direct TV will be dish run.

Look at what happen when ATT merged with any wireless carrier. Bad service and over priced service.

I hope the merger never happens.
 
The only way Dish and DIRECTV merge is if they are both shrunk down via massive subscriber loss, and the combination will end up being smaller than today's DIRECTV. Maybe if one day the universal service fund manages to get high speed internet to every house with unlimited bandwidth and all the providers are a la carte over the internet.
 
Tucked away in the news concerning Dish wanting internet url sites was a little tidbit by Joe Clayton:

Dish Network Corp. (DISH), the second- largest U.S. satellite-TV provider, applied for the Web-address suffixes “.direct” and “.dtv” -- names that relate more closely to the brand of its chief competitor, DirecTV. (DTV)
A nonprofit Web-management group released a list yesterday of 1,930 applications of new Internet domain suffixes, which companies can use to market their brands and operations. The idea is to go beyond the typical dot-com addresses that are common today. Dish applied for 13 of the names, with two appearing to reference its larger rival.
Aaron Johnson, a spokesman for Englewood, Colorado-based Dish, said the names have nothing to do with DirecTV. Dish is applying for the suffixes to potentially attach them to marketing, strategic and competitive services, Johnson said. He declined to cite specific products or programs that the suffixes may relate to.
“We see these names serving a variety of applications,” Johnson said.
DirecTV doesn’t plan to challenge the applications, which cost $185,000 each. El Segundo, California-based DirecTV didn’t apply for any of the suffixes itself because the company isn’t intending to use them, said Darris Gringeri, a spokesman.
U.S. regulators blocked a proposed merger between Dish and DirecTV in 2002. Dish Chief Executive Officer Joseph Clayton said last year he wouldn’t discount the possibility of a future merger between the two companies.
Dish shares rose 1 percent to $27.22 at 3:19 p.m. in New York. DirecTV climbed 2.1 percent to $43.89.
That's $2.4 million.

I wonder how much the exorbitant increase AMC is asking would cost?
 
Backwards thinking! I wonder how much income will be derived from getting them.......
It's not backwards at all. It's comparing business expenditures.

As for ROI, as you bring up, I wonder how much revenue will be lost be losing AMC? (That is lost by existing subs leaving, and possible new subs choosing a competitor.)

Personally, I doubt very much if these domains will result in huge amounts of revenue. If somebody is loking for Dish, they will go to dish.com. If they are looking for DirecTV, they will go to directv.com. I doubt if Dish will be hijacking any potential DirecTV subs this way. It's also kind of sleazy, like the domains that are misspellings of real domains, hoping to trick bad spellers and typo-fingers.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)