DISH Reaches Long Term Agreement with DISNEY / ESPN / ABC

satjay

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Jun 30, 2005
12,703
879
Michigan
Was a bit surprised to see channel logos back to, well we can continue our speculation on logos good or logos bad.. :)
 

DWS44

SatelliteGuys Master
Supporting Founder
Apr 14, 2004
7,446
4,682
Rock Hill, SC
Any updates will be posted here, I promise you that. Until then, no sense in asking the same questions over and over when there isn't new information. Hopefully this will all be over soon.

Oh God...there's that word. We're all screwed now. :tsk:


:haha
 

wallyhts

SatelliteGuys Pro
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Lifetime Supporter
Apr 24, 2008
3,218
442
Disney would like to see the Hopper go away • 6:45 AM

Negotiations between Dish Network (DISH) and Disney (DIS) on a new carriage contract are tripping up over Dish's AutoHop feature, according to sources.
Several media companies have taken Dish to court over the ad-skipping technology to little avail.
 

MikeD-C05

Pub Member / Supporter
Pub Member / Supporter
Nov 25, 2003
33,204
31,560
Nederland , Texas
The only channel affected by the auto skip feature would be ABC channel. Espn,Abc Family and Disney channels don't have auto skip ....YET! But I am sure that Charlie is using the auto skip feature as a way to get the price down on carriage rates for Disney and or Abc channels.
 

Mister Coke

SatelliteGuys Pro
May 19, 2013
182
164
Oak Hill Ohio
Dish-Disney Deal Hung Up On The Hopper?
By Swanni


Washington, D.C. (October 2, 2013) - This is an update on our earlier coverage of the fee fight between Dish and the Disney-owned ESPN. See earlier articles below.

The carriage standoff between Dish and Disney could be over the satcaster's ad-skipping Hopper HD DVR, which Disney's ABC has attempted to terminate in court, reports Bloomberg News.

The two companies on Monday night announced that they have agreed to a short-term extension in their carriage talks, at least temporarily avoiding a blackout of ESPN, Disney-owned ABC affiliates in eight cities and the Disney channels on ESPN's airwaves.

But Bloomberg writes that a new programming agreement could be in jeopardy because of the Hopper, and Disney's insistence that Dish carry two new Disney channels, Fusion and the SEC Network.

The Hopper could be the most difficult obstacle to overcome. The set-top
can automatically skip commercials during recorded network prime time programs. The networks, including ABC, say the HD DVR violates their copyrights because it removes the commercials without their permission. Dish maintains that the Hopper is just a better version of the traditional HD DVR because it skips the ads without the viewer needing to pick up a remote to perform the same task.



Thus far, Dish has successfully blocked the networks' legal efforts to stop subscribers from using the Hopper, but the lawsuits are still pending.

Bloomberg says the two companies have given themselves an extra day or two to work out a solution, but a longer negotiation is also possible.

Dish could use the Hopper as leverage to force Disney to accept lower fees to carry its channels, including ESPN and the ABC-owned affiliates, which are in eight large markets. For example, in return for agreeing to dismantle the Hopper so subscribers couldn't use its ad-skipping feature when ABC is on, Dish might be permitted to pay less to carry the Disney suite of channels.

TVPredictions.com has written in the past that Dish Chairman Charlie Ergen views the Hopper as a possible weapon in carriage talks and would gladly dump it if it meant paying less to carry certain channels.
 

mike123abc

Too many cables
Supporting Founder
Sep 25, 2003
25,357
4,604
Norman, OK
The only channel affected by the auto skip feature would be ABC channel. Espn,Abc Family and Disney channels don't have auto skip ....YET! But I am sure that Charlie is using the auto skip feature as a way to get the price down on carriage rates for Disney and or Abc channels.

I doubt he is using it to get the price down. Most likely Disney simply inserted language in the contract barring any ad skipping technology and Dish may be trying to negotiate some sort of skipping allowed.

The media companies view what Dish is doing as a violation of their existing contracts. They obviously (or they would have barred it) thought they had it covered with language that probably required complete delivery of the programming without cuts. Since the hopper does not alter the programming in any way with their skipping, it gets around the language of the current contracts as shown by the courts not issuing injunctions before trial. A trial will eventually determine if Dish did violate the copyright in some way or another, but for now it looks like ad skipping via the method being used by Dish is not violating the current contract.

I bet every channel's lawyers have been working overtime to put in language to prevent any automatic or provider assisted ad skipping in their contracts. I predict this was a one time loophole used by Dish that will be closed in all contract renewals.

But, this does not preclude a deal where someone pays extra for a channel to compensate for ad skipping if the provider feels they could attract more customers by offering this premium service. Perhaps Dish will use some of the monthly Hopper fee to buy this premium service for their customers.
 

cosmo_kramer

Master of my Domain
Pub Member / Supporter
Oct 13, 2005
26,559
31,013
41.605N, -72.879W
Why do we still post Swanni articles here?? All he does is copy other's work (Bloomberg, in this case), and add stuff that's just flat out wrong:

TVPredictions.com has written in the past that Dish Chairman Charlie Ergen views the Hopper as a possible weapon in carriage talks and would gladly dump it if it meant paying less to carry certain channels.

Dish will dump the Hopper?? Really?? :confused::eek:
 

navychop

Member of the Month - July 2014!
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Jul 20, 2005
60,011
27,279
Northern VA
Doesn't know the difference between the Hopper and Autohop.

Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
 

bradfordj

SatelliteGuys Pro
May 18, 2009
204
5
CA
Yep, back up. The ABC station in SF was not affected. It is an ABC O&O. Interesting to see what the uplink brings later today.
 

lakebum431

Pub Member / Supporter
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Sep 5, 2005
17,004
4,898
Norris, TN
I don't see Dish backing down on Autohop. And for those of you that don't like it or don't use it, I don't understand unless you just don't watch network TV. The autohop is awesome and I hate that it isn't on every program!
 

osu1991

SatelliteGuys Master
Sep 4, 2004
10,192
2,598
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Its just speculation that the Hopper is the hold up, it could well just be the carriage of additional channels is all that they are haggling over. If it was over auto hop, I think the channels would be down already.
 

Rey

@ your service
Supporting Founder
Feb 8, 2008
27,003
585
Florida
Why do we still post Swanni articles here?? All he does is copy other's work (Bloomberg, in this case), and add stuff that's just flat out wrong:



Dish will dump the Hopper?? Really?? :confused::eek:

Same fool who Guaranteed a Dish and Directv merger more than once. Embarrassing.........
 

bnewt

SatelliteGuys Pro
Oct 6, 2003
1,442
473
Shepherdsville, Ky
auto hop or not..........no one watches the commercials
with the dvr, everyone just uses the skip ahead or the fast forward button.........are the programmers going to argue over that too:mad:
 

EricfromTx

SatelliteGuys Pro
Apr 9, 2011
211
25
McAllen
auto hop or not..........no one watches the commercials
with the dvr, everyone just uses the skip ahead or the fast forward button.........are the programmers going to argue over that too:mad:
Just makes it easier and faster to skip commercials so you don't even have to push anything to skip them.
 

olfenite

SatelliteGuys Family
Apr 6, 2008
118
0
I have a solution.

Let's make autohop ala carte. If Dish intends to keep Autohop, they're going to have to start paying the networks more. In turn it will make our bill higher.

Why should I be changed for a feature I don't even use? Make it optional. The people who want it can pay for it.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)