They gave Disney everything they wanted, including this-
DirecTV also has the rights to distribute Disney's upcoming ESPN flagship direct-to-consumer service with its expected 2025 launch
So no lawsuit/fight trying to prevent it from launching.
Then this-
along with Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+. In addition, DirecTV will bundle Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ with "select DirecTV packages" under a wholesale agreement, and the pay-TV provider will sell the Disney streamers to customers on an a la carte basis.
This is the same thing Spectrum received, if anyone wants to know how well that turned out, here-
Analysts at LightShed Partners, in a July 16 blog, noted the report from Puck's John Ourand indicates less than 10% of Charter's roughly 9.5 million Signature Select video package customers are activating Disney+ and questioned if the operator's vision for video is wrong.
"Charter is back to where it started, stuffing video offerings into its bundle that the vast majority of its consumers do not use, which hurts the price/value of the video bundle," wrote analysts led by Richard Greenfield. Meanwhile, Disney is getting paid $3-4 per subscriber per month by Charter for all 9.5 million subscribers even though less than 1 million might be using it
As the video landscape evolves operators have been looking to offer new kinds of TV options and packages, including bringing streaming into the fold in different ways. | Christine Whitaker, president of Comcast’s Central Division, told StreamTV Insider initial results indicate the Netflix...
I would say DIRECTV Rolled DIsney, as DISNEY did not want to give them the direct to home service, which DIRECTV will now be giving away for free. Meaning other providers will be given the same thing somewhere down the line.
Actually thinking about it more... its probably a win win for both.
I would say DIRECTV Rolled DIsney, as DISNEY did not want to give them the direct to home service, which DIRECTV will now be giving away for free. Meaning other providers will be given the same thing somewhere down the line.
Actually thinking about it more... its probably a win win for both.
Unless the DTC service has things that are only available there, then no one would need to pay for it anyway. The DTC would be worthless for anyone with DTV.
What I think is meant is DTV can offer that service and drop things from other packages.
Well, it basically only cost me $80.00. One month subscription to Hulu live TV. I was able to pick up a Gemini air for 50 bucks and two Geminis for $10 each though since people were basically giving them away.
Honestly the real ones who got rolled are the consumers, which if the way these things always end up.
I think both will lose customers as many places found where to watch for free. I know a few bars that were pulling a few of the games from not legal streams. They feel since they are paying for the package and NFL its their right. (and they are wrong.)
I think both will lose customers as many places found where to watch for free. I know a few bars that were pulling a few of the games from not legal streams. They feel since they are paying for the package and NFL its their right. (and they are wrong.)
100% total agreement, those who steal programming are absolute scum, streaming is not expensive, cannot afford the $70 to get almost everything, get one service a month, then switch them every month.
It will happen eventually. Dish is still building new satellites DIRECTV is not.
They will be combined at some point.
There is a lot of savings that could be had if they combine together.
I have heard in the past the Hoppers can do Directv with a new card and dish. While Directv for all practical purposes has not been working on new satellites DIRECTV receivers for many years now.
The question I have is does dish have the money to convert the Directv customers over?
I still see a partnership with Amazon or Google somewhere down the road that will be the lifeline they need.
What are you thinking about the scuttle talk on the merger, obviously we have heard the talk for years and years, but in today's environment, does this "rumor" have any teeth
EchoStar total liabilities from 2011 to 2025. Total liabilities can be defined as the total value of all possible claims against the corporation. <ul style='margin-top:10px;'> <li>EchoStar total liabilities for the quarter ending September 30, 2025 were...