I was thinking about this along with the Olympics and the Marv Albert signing, who has the most depth when it comes to sports programming. Now, with the Olympics you could argue that its ESPN/ABC because they seem to have every sport on as it is and they have plenty of avenues to showcase the games.
With Marv Albert signing with CBS Sports, CBS has a strong lineup as well. Not to cover the Olympics because CBS/Turner dont have a bid but for other sports. I mean look at there NFL coverage. They have Nantz, Gumbel, Albert, Eagle, etc. Look at there NCAA coverage. They have Nantz, Eagle, Albert, Lundquist, Harlan etc. I mean they have a lot of depth.
So how would you rank the depth chart as far as sports goes? If you were to look at each network by programming, announcers, etc. who would be the strongest, who would be the weakest?
With Marv Albert signing with CBS Sports, CBS has a strong lineup as well. Not to cover the Olympics because CBS/Turner dont have a bid but for other sports. I mean look at there NFL coverage. They have Nantz, Gumbel, Albert, Eagle, etc. Look at there NCAA coverage. They have Nantz, Eagle, Albert, Lundquist, Harlan etc. I mean they have a lot of depth.
So how would you rank the depth chart as far as sports goes? If you were to look at each network by programming, announcers, etc. who would be the strongest, who would be the weakest?