Future rf ATSC 3.0 channels for Albuquerque's TV market (1 Viewer)

N5XZS

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Pro
Jan 23, 2005
3,310
1,240
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Did little research on where future ATSC 3.0 rf channels would be placed. :) :clapping

I guess rf ch. 2 to 6 is not likely placed here, unless they want to take chances regardless of high band noise or E-skip, F2 skip layers.:eeek:facepalm

However, VHF-Hi could be placed for ATSC 3.0 rf channels like 9, 11 and 12.

Now we go on UHF band channels like 14 "not likely due to 2 way radio QRM" 28, 31, 33 and 34 could be used for ATSC 3.0.

Now of course some of the low power stations could be converted from ATSC 1.0 to ATSC 3.0 if they agree to share Network channels, on their allocated rf channel.

Now what you think of this?:biggrin2
 

Ypsiguy

SatelliteGuys Pro
Jul 5, 2019
273
236
Ypsilanti, MI
I believe the FCC position is that the transition must be done within existing RF allocations.

Thus the idea of ATSC 3.0 “lighthouse“ stations.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Latest posts

Top