How things have changed

This is more how things are not changed, going back to ad supported Television.


Advertising-supported tiers made up 46% of streaming subscriptions at SVOD platforms that offer both options — with and without ads — at the end of March, up by 33%, or 7 percentage points, year-on-year. Over the past nine quarters, ad plans drove 71% of net subscriber additions for premium SVOD (streaming video-on-demand), according to the latest State Of Subscriptions report from leading market research firm Antenna.

If a service starts killing off their no ads packages, I will drop it, do not care if it is Disney, Netflix or Paramount ( my three favorites), gone, time is short to be constantly interrupted by ads.

I have almost every service ad free, except Peacock, it is still less expensive then the least expensive packages from Cable/Satellite.
 
If a service starts killing off their no ads packages
I think that is a real possibility in the not too distant future. I think once it goes above 50% of subscribers using the ad-supported tiers they will either eliminate the ad-free plans or make them so expensive no one will pay it. I'm sure advertisers hate knowing there is 54% of streamers not watching their ads.
 
On Demand Streaming Services are only 1 point behind Cable Channels and Broadcast Channels combined, in the month of April.

IMG_1921.webp

Quite soon, streaming will top them.
 
I think that is a real possibility in the not too distant future. I think once it goes above 50% of subscribers using the ad-supported tiers they will either eliminate the ad-free plans or make them so expensive no one will pay it. I'm sure advertisers hate knowing there is 54% of streamers not watching their ads.
As long as ad sales are soft, I expect the ad-free tiers to stick around:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Simmons
What about the other side of the coin; why wouldn't they drop their ad service so folks will have to pay in full to get it at all?

Would it be possible to stream to DVR and delay-skip ads?
 
What about the other side of the coin; why wouldn't they drop their ad service so folks will have to pay in full to get it at all?

Would it be possible to stream to DVR and delay-skip ads?
they make a killing on the ad-support services. I have no idea of the exact numbers, but I would have to guess an ad-supported subscriber at $10 is way more profitable to them than an ad-free subscriber at $20
 
they make a killing on the ad-support services. I have no idea of the exact numbers, but I would have to guess an ad-supported subscriber at $10 is way more profitable to them than an ad-free subscriber at $20
That is my guess also.

The other part about advertising on streaming vs Cable/Satellite/Broadcast, the advertisers receive accurate numbers about how many are watching, vs the old way, which was estimated.

Precise numbers can be worth a lot of money for those selling the ad time, specially for a higher rated/watched show.
 
If the receiver is connected to the internet or in the old days phone line, it's possible.
But again, that would only be some, not all.

Also, only a smaller percentage use Satellite TV now, 12 Million of about 66-68 Million that has a paid Live TV service.

Using Netflix as an example, they know exactly how many are watching, by the minute.
 
I think a large majority of Dish customers are Internet connected, and have been for years.
While you might be right, the metrics on streaming are exact.

They know the exact person watching, their time zone, location, when they tune in, when they tune out, what they watch next, etc etc. It is extremely granular.

While Dish might have an idea what's being watched and what's popular, they have no idea who is actually watching and they have no way to connect the dots on what that person watches.

Keep in mind that with streaming, many people (weirdos!) don't have tvs and watch on phones/laptops, which means they're capturing this data next to site-tracking cookies.
 

MAX Changing Names Again...

Peacock TV

Top