Is surround sound for music and home theater on its way out?
- Thread starter dfergie
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 99
- Views 18K
No more or less so than synthesizing a stereo mix. Put another way there is no there there. It's all an artificial construct since its likely that no two musicians were recording at the same time. They might not have been in the same studio for that matter.
So which artificial reality is right? Yes
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
It is trivial to create a stereo sound field from a multitrack recording. You just pan each track towards one side or the other (or leave it centered as in the case of lead vocals). The really trick equipment may let you add an echo from a track on to the other channel.
"Panning" in two or three dimensions is an exponentially more complex proposition.
"Panning" in two or three dimensions is an exponentially more complex proposition.
Harshness:
It is "trivial" to do a stereo mix but decidedly non-trivial to do a good or great one.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
It is "trivial" to do a stereo mix but decidedly non-trivial to do a good or great one.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
It isn't difficult at all. I usually just pan a track to the position that the track's source would have on stage. You can certainly complicate it with effects but good stereo is relatively easy to come by.
The fewer the tracks the easier it can be.
But there's a reason the best are the best, and it isn't because its easy to do.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
I don't think so. Still using my 5.1 speaker system that was set up wayyy back in 2005. Well those single speaker sound bars could also cater for minimalist and limited spaces. It really depends as to where and when it's primarily used for. I'm good with my current one.
Apparently you have to sell a child to get a reasonable complement of inputs.
Way back when I had the Q8 version, really sounded good circling the room...I very much enjoy my surround sound system, listening to "Dark Side of the Moon" and "Money."
Anyway, we need to get surround sound right, as we get the Holosuite ready for market.
SACD is the surround sound audio discs, they were intended to replace CDs, but never took off in the U.S. I know Sony still makes a few combo players that will play them, but most DVD or Blu-ray players can not play them. And so far no computers can play them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Audio_CD
Exactly... what people don't realize is CDs are nothing more than compressed data, some of the quality is actually lost in the recording, and music downloads are even worse... great for portability, but not for enjoying at home. Also the room's acoustics makes a difference, homes aren't built with the thought of listening to sound.
more like sell your soul to the Devil, LOLApparently you have to sell a child to get a reasonable complement of inputs.
Since moving 7 months ago to new house. I use the full setup for everything now. I'm sure the neighbors appreciated my subs as much as I did while watching Fast Five the other night
I love mine. I can walk out th front door, down my driveway, and stand at my mailbox, and something like Jurassic Park sounds like Godzilla is destroying my house.
#dontcare
#dontcare
CD audio is ABSOLUTELY NOT compressed. What makes it less than perfect is the sampling rate (44KHz) that is capable of representing 64k volume levels of sounds up to 22KHz).
If you read the article, SACD supports multi-channel but it was more about capacity (4.7GB) and fidelity (105dB from 20-50KHz) of conventional stereo.
This was a case where there was an early format (SACD) and a late-comer (DVD-A) and both effectively failed because most adult humans couldn't possibly discern the difference. UHD runs a similar risk if they don't get moving on affordable players and appealing content.
I have both those formats. My hearing is not great. But I certainly tell the difference. 7.1 surround is great, but rare.
Similar threads
