This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Level Playing Field Between Cable, Dish

silversurfer

Supporting Founder
Original poster
Supporting Founder
Sep 8, 2003
1,147
1
Las Vegas, Nevada

For the entire article click here
 
How about offering a national HD feed for each network for those that have their locals available on satellite and when a commercial or local news comes on have it switch over from the HD national feed to your local station.
 
Stargazer said:
How about offering a national HD feed for each network for those that have their locals available on satellite and when a commercial or local news comes on have it switch over from the HD national feed to your local station.

Although that is technically feasible, building a system with hundreds of independently operated feeds all time synched to new HD receivers that can switch instantly and seamlessly between the HD and SD channels is not likely to happen.
 
From the article...
"...satellite TV already has an advantage because it does not have to meet stringent regulations set by local governments. For example, cable operators have to agree to broadcast city council sessions to win a city's cable franchise."
Just how does having to allot one channel to 'local access' put cables at a disadvantage with respect to DBS providers who must also allot bandwidth to 'public interest' channels?

Cable operators tent to lose market share when they arbitrarily raise rates to the point where they force their customers to seek more affordable alternatives.

As to the so-called "stringent regulations" cables supposedly must meet, a cable franchise is in reality a cash cow for the operator, just as sat tv is for DBS providers. How either manages (or mismanages) their gross revenues is a story for another thread.