My Slimline SS's

[gadgtfreek]

Let me know how these look for Va area, around Richmond.

 

[DJ Rob]

Those are really good I think. Mine top out at 70-75 on all sats except for when I choose SWM.

 

[Rey]

looking real good elway

 

[atp1313]

Aside from the zero's (which may not be usable transponders anyway) looks good. I didn't realize that SWM counted as its own Satellite with transponders.

 

[gadgtfreek]

Me either. Dunno what it really means for the SWM.

PLEASE LOG IN TO GET RID OF THESE ADS!

 

[Rey]

Me either. Dunno what it really means for the SWM.

what does it mean?

 

[gadgtfreek]

Maybe someone knows.

 

[DJ Rob]

I was told by the tech that installed me that it was the signal quality between the receiver and the swm.

 

[Rey]

I was told by the tech that installed me that it was the signal quality between the receiver and the swm.

ahh that makes sense. how stupid of me not to notice that. thanks Rob

 

[gadgtfreek]

Thats good. Maybe you can use it to monitor the health of the SWM.

PLEASE LOG IN TO GET RID OF THESE ADS!

 

[jcrandall]

My understanding is that the 1-8 are the 8 tuner slots, the signal is based on whatever transponder that slot was last used for. The ninth is the communication link between the receivers and the swm.

 

[gadgtfreek]

Cool, thanks.

 

[Jimbo]

Did anyone notice that the SWM setting is there and the settings for the 110 are missing ???
Or did elway just not post the 110 ?

Jimbo

 

[grydlok]

Did anyone notice that the SWM setting is there and the settings for the 110 are missing ???
Or did elway just not post the 110 ?

Jimbo

He probably just didn't post them. The 110 still works under swm.

 

[gadgtfreek]

I didnt worry with them, they were all mostly 98-100.

PLEASE LOG IN TO GET RID OF THESE ADS!

 

[Jimbo]

I didnt worry with them, they were all mostly 98-100.

Thats good, I just thought that maybe that had something to do with it ...
I don't have a SWM so I'm not sure how it works as far as listings go.

Jimbo