riverawynter said:
I was expecting "Digital" quality out of the locals and other channels(CNN, Bravo,...) and I just can't see any difference. Sometimes even some channels(SD) from cable would be better than in E*. Initially I thought it was the component cables. So I switch to HDMI. I barely could notice any improvement. HD channels are on par with cable but the rest are just the same(if not worse). Has anybody seen this? My display is a Samsung HLP4663wx.
The term "digital quality" is pretty much meaningless. In many ways, digital opens the door for degredation of image quality through over compression, etc... On a 32" or smaller NTSC TV, you probably won't notice the effects of a bad digital signal. But, on a higher resolution, big-screen TV, these flaws really jump out.
Some have suggested using either S-Video or even (gasp) composite video connections. To me, this sounds like making a bad situation even worse. If you're already dealing with an over-compressed digital signal, I can't see how using a low quality video connection could improve things. It probably just masks the effects of over-compression with other image flaws. Besides, jumping inputs on my TV just to switch between HD and SD seems pretty silly, too... Chances are, the HDMI or composite inputs are callibrated diferently than a composite or S-video input.
In the end, SD will always suffer in comparison to HD. Once you've experienced HD, SD is a lot tougher to live with. Spend some time calibrating your TV, turn off any edge-enhancements, make sure the sharpness control is not set too agressively and finally come to terms with the fact that SD, even in digital, still pretty much sucks
