agreed! She may not always be right but you still listen to herAnd, of course, you immediately change it to channel 4. Grandmas are always right!!!![]()
agreed! She may not always be right but you still listen to herAnd, of course, you immediately change it to channel 4. Grandmas are always right!!!![]()
Some people believe that a particular entity can do no wrong and they will swarm to their defense. If you go to the opposing carrier's Facebook page, you probably see a lot of the same that casts the carrier as the hero who is fighting the good fight against having the pay for free TV.That's not the impression I've seen with local channels, via their Facebook pages, for example, when Dish, Time Warner, or Directv drop them.
As I get older, I've discovered that the people who market stuff are much less interested in my business or what I think about theirs. They're a whole lot less interested in loyalty than they are in when I'm going to spend money with them again. As ratings become more finely divided, the less they care about those classes outside of their primary focus.Try telling that to older people who only watch one channel's newscast. My grandma is one of them.
That makes no sense..... You suggest the local stations have all the power (must carry - which clearly isn't the case, otherwise Dish wouldn't drop locals when contracts run out) but Dish didn't pay what they station asked for.The locals have the sats over a barrel because of the must-carry rules. And they are greedy. One of loacls in the Madison, WI DMA was asking for $5 last year. They, of course didn't get that.
I'm curious... have you ever turned down a raise? If not, why are you so greedy? Have you ever asked for a raise? Why are you so greedy?I stated it badly. Here is a better explanation:
http://www.fcc.gov/guides/cable-carriage-broadcast-stations
But that doesn't explain why the local stations are so greedy. It's maybe more to do with DMA boundaries where Dish can't bring in a different affilliate to replace the greedy one. As I stated elsewhere, the rules are NOT pro-consumer. I think things would be much more fun if the custumer could pick between the two nearest affiliates on a network-by-network basis.
This discussion is about satellite carriage, not cable. There is a difference - there are different rules.
Other than the added confusion of Significantly Viewed, the rules aren't all that different. Both modes still have to observe DMA boundaries.This discussion is about satellite carriage, not cable. There is a difference - there are different rules.
Isn't that pretty much how it goes? Station owners are panicing for revenue and they decide to double or triple their asking price. It isn't like most of them have made major improvements to their offerings or any of them are going to stop showing infomercials.replace "Bayou City Broadcasting" with whatever company dish is fighting with and you have their "stock" letter
in a lot of areas that is easier said than done. I can give some good examplesEveryone could just go with an outdoor antenna .
plenty of themI wondered if there were areas of the USA not served well by OTA.
and even then you may not accomplish anything. One thing that killed reception in a lot of areas is the DTV conversion. Analog translators just went off the air. I have seen too many fugly tvfool reports that show not much for receptionin my mind I am seeing a tall expensive tower and high gain antennas in those areas.