Pages load slow or not at all

[Jimbo]

Ok great! Then it is more likely comcast's fault, as I don't know what the problem is, since it is the same on all browsers I have tried. If AT&T didn't go backwards dumping DSL ( 6MBs down ) and forcing UVerse ( 3MBs down ) I would have switched over.

Most places you can still get the 6mb DSL if you tell them thats what you want, Uverse also covers the same speeds that DSL had previously with a Huge upside of much faster available.

 

[Jimbo]

I am still having page loading issues. Pms are very hard to get to, and start. What browser does this forum prefer?

I don't know if there is a "Favored" browser, I use FF and Chrome, Chrome more than FF now that I have gotten use to how Chrome works.

 

[T134]

Using Comcast biz 50/10 I checked FF (I use that here all the time) and Internet Exploder. Also checked dolphin & chrome on my phone with both comcast and AT&T 4G LTE. Even pulled it up on the Amiko A3. Tried logged in, not logged in, ad block, no ad block. Site loads fast for me no matter what. No problems with Satelliteguys site or Comcast or devices or different browsers.

 

[T134]

This post is using a UK VPN gateway. Satguys still loads fast with no problems.

 

[bigjohnok]

Somebody is doing some nefarious deeds on the intrawebs today.
I have had issues with pages loading from facebook to this site to other sites I frequent.
I even disconnected from my vpn account to see if that was the issue along with rebooting modem and router multiple times.

 

[FTA4PA]

Running Firefox 33 for Ubuntu Linux with a lousy Verizon DSL speed of only 2.1Mbps (Verizon) and pages still load quick for me.

Sorry to quote myself. Running Firefox 34 now, still under Ubuntu Linux 12.04 with Verizon DSL of only 2.1Mbps and no issues.

 

[pickone4me]

I did a trace route last night, and I just ran one a little while ago, it goes over to Minnesota, then Illinois, and then some unfamiliar IP addresses.
I also just tried a proxy server, the page loads are are fast!


My computer is just fine! It is more then likely routing issues, between me and the website.
I don't see my IP address any where in the below trace route, so I won't have to edit it out.
traceroute to satelliteguys.com (184.168.221.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 1.228 ms 1.267 ms 1.332 ms
2 96.120.48.209 (96.120.48.209) 20.234 ms 20.324 ms 20.382 ms
3 te-8-3-ur01.manitowoc.wi.minn.comcast.net (68.87.179.49) 20.510 ms 20.602 ms 20.651 ms
4 te-0-4-0-23-ur02.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net (69.139.176.114) 41.279 ms 41.491 ms 41.567 ms
5 he-0-5-0-0-ar01.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net (69.139.219.238) 42.047 ms 41.805 ms 42.111 ms
6 he-1-10-0-0-cr01.350ecermak.il.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.166.249) 54.893 ms 34.928 ms 37.739 ms
7 pos-1-4-0-0-pe01.350ecermak.il.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.86.162) 35.761 ms 39.756 ms 39.966 ms
8 as26496-1-c.350ecermak.il.ibone.comcast.net (23.30.207.222) 40.154 ms 40.259 ms 43.545 ms
9 * * *
10 ip-184-168-0-86.ip.secureserver.net (184.168.0.86) 103.136 ms 103.366 ms 107.037 ms
11 te0-0-0-7.trmc0215-01.ars.mgmt.phx3.gdg (184.168.0.85) 111.049 ms 111.335 ms 111.227 ms
12 ip-184-168-0-94.ip.secureserver.net (184.168.0.94) 94.311 ms 91.637 ms ip-184-168-0-102.ip.secureserver.net (184.168.0.102) 90.838 ms
13 ip-184-168-221-8.ip.secureserver.net (184.168.221.8) 92.796 ms 96.285 ms 95.834 ms

 

[Mr Tony]

I switched modes to the "classic" mode. My issue was the flash player was hosing up my crappy netbook. The classic mode doesnt do that

 

[Scott Greczkowski]

Just FYI the Classic look has the same flash components in it.

 

[T134]

I did a trace route last night, and I just ran one a little while ago, it goes over to Minnesota, then Illinois, and then some unfamiliar IP addresses.
I also just tried a proxy server, the page loads are are fast!


My computer is just fine! It is more then likely routing issues, between me and the website.
I don't see my IP address any where in the below trace route, so I won't have to edit it out.
traceroute to satelliteguys.com (184.168.221.8), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 1.228 ms 1.267 ms 1.332 ms
2 96.120.48.209 (96.120.48.209) 20.234 ms 20.324 ms 20.382 ms
3 te-8-3-ur01.manitowoc.wi.minn.comcast.net (68.87.179.49) 20.510 ms 20.602 ms 20.651 ms
4 te-0-4-0-23-ur02.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net (69.139.176.114) 41.279 ms 41.491 ms 41.567 ms
5 he-0-5-0-0-ar01.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net (69.139.219.238) 42.047 ms 41.805 ms 42.111 ms
6 he-1-10-0-0-cr01.350ecermak.il.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.166.249) 54.893 ms 34.928 ms 37.739 ms
7 pos-1-4-0-0-pe01.350ecermak.il.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.86.162) 35.761 ms 39.756 ms 39.966 ms
8 as26496-1-c.350ecermak.il.ibone.comcast.net (23.30.207.222) 40.154 ms 40.259 ms 43.545 ms
9 * * *
10 ip-184-168-0-86.ip.secureserver.net (184.168.0.86) 103.136 ms 103.366 ms 107.037 ms
11 te0-0-0-7.trmc0215-01.ars.mgmt.phx3.gdg (184.168.0.85) 111.049 ms 111.335 ms 111.227 ms
12 ip-184-168-0-94.ip.secureserver.net (184.168.0.94) 94.311 ms 91.637 ms ip-184-168-0-102.ip.secureserver.net (184.168.0.102) 90.838 ms
13 ip-184-168-221-8.ip.secureserver.net (184.168.221.8) 92.796 ms 96.285 ms 95.834 ms

Hate to say it but unless the internet sucks in Wisconsin I don't think you have a routing issue. 4-13 in your tracert are identical to mine and zero issues here.

 

[Mr Tony]

Just FYI the Classic look has the same flash components in it.

well there is something different between the classic and the "normal". The normal hangs and says slow to respond. Classic has no issues

 

[mike123abc]

well there is something different between the classic and the "normal". The normal hangs and says slow to respond. Classic has no issues

I suspect the main difference is the links to facebook, twitter, youtube, etc that are on the bottom of the normal but are missing on the classic...

 

[Hall]

I suspect the main difference is the links to facebook, twitter, youtube, etc that are on the bottom of the normal but are missing on the classic...

Those are just links though -- nothing is "loaded" other than the graphic "buttons" themselves and they are no doubt tiny.