Sinclair May Pull Stations From Mediacom

  • WELCOME TO THE NEW SERVER!

    If you are seeing this you are on our new server WELCOME HOME!

    While the new server is online Scott is still working on the backend including the cachine. But the site is usable while the work is being completes!

    Thank you for your patience and again WELCOME HOME!

    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE
David Smith (and Sinclair) like to make money. Just like Charlie Ergen, he's pissed off a lot of people by sticking to his guns and playing "chicken" in his negotiations. Understand that there's a lot of money at stake in retransmission deals. TV stations watch from the sidelines while cable networks strike deals for $2-3 per subscriber per month for a couple of hours a month of "must see" programming (i.e. ESPN). With the market price for programming growing every year, Sinclair has no reason why they should accept "what Charter pays to other stations" unless Sinclair's content is no more valuable than the content on the other stations. However, that content isn't just measured as gross rating points or average ratings, it's also measured by the amount of "must see" content.

For what it's worth, the management of Sinclair treats their employees with the same amount of respect as it treats its viewers. One of the reasons I don't work there anymore.
 
Tonight at midnight is the deadline. Talks have broken off between Mediacom & Sinclair and Sinclair owned stations will be dropped from Mediacom lineup's. This whole ordeal has been ugly from the get go with both sides holding press conferences and running attack ads.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)