video62 said:
Dish has a method to their madness with spotbeams and suchlike, but it seems funny that it has taken them so long to add Columbus when they are higher in the
DMA list (34th) than other cities that already have their locals. Example: Tulsa is 60th, locals since July, 2002 and Albuquerque-Santa Fe is 49th, locals since Nov, 2000.
Baltimore seems to be the highest market on the list still without locals at 23rd, so Columbus isn't alone in its waiting.
Video,
The reason for interesting discrepancies you point out have to do with two things, location and the willingness of the locals to be put up without undue demands.
The WBNS Columbus thing was already explained. This is before Dish realized that it could still sell locals in a market missing one or even two major affiliates and people would still buy them. Saying that, Cincinnati launched without the NBC affiliate until Dish gave in and picked up Lifetiume Movie Network on AT100.
The main reason is location. The Dish sport beams can only carry so many TV stations. Even though there are three transponders on the "Ohio" spot beam, there are quite a few cities in the area. Currently Dish has Cincinnati, Cleveland, Detroit, Buffalo, Lexington and Pittsburgh locals residing on these three VERY crowded transponders.
Still in the area are Columbus, Zanesville, Lima, Youngstown, Parkersburg, Huntington/Charleston (not completely covered by this spot), Ft. Wayne, Dayton/Springfield and Toledo.
However if you look at the California area, you have a spot beam that carries Los Angeles. Around LA there are a ton of smaller markets. So...what do you do. Let the additional bandwidth lay around or pick up Santa Barbara (coming to 110° probably tomorrow). So what if it's a smaller market than Columbus. That bandwidth is unavailable in Ohio!
Same thing happened with Chico and Eugene.
See ya
Tony