My bet is, that in today's world, Dish had a bigger smile.
According to the demands that Tribune wanted and DISH did NOT , yes they wanted DISH to pay for a local WGN in each of their dmas in addition to the national WGN ,meaning that DISH would pay twice for the same channel. This is what held the whole thing up for 3 months.I may have missed what you are asking.... were they wanting their local WGN to be carried nationally along with the National WGN?
According to the demands that Tribune wanted and DISH did NOT , yes they wanted DISH to pay for a local WGN in each of their dmas in addition to the national WGN ,meaning that DISH would pay twice for the same channel.
yes.Right, but the national channel in question was WGN America, not a new channel and not WGN9 (Chicago local).
Maybe I misunderstood the whole thing. I guess after reading post #739 in the original Tribune /DISH dispute thread again , that Tribune wanted to link and tie their locals carriage with the national cable channel WGN. So that would be forced bundling where you had to take WGN if you wanted Tribune local channels and it would inflate the price of both . So DISH of course didn't want that and they held out for three months. That is why Charlie said that the WGN national cable channel wasn't worth that big of an increase due to lack of good original programming. I'm still betting that Tribune blinked first. But either way the customer is the one that will pay the price for all of it.
"Warren" says to visit mydish.com/thanks to get a free ppv movie as a token of their appreciation.
All good for the next week, here.Gracenote is still not updated past the next hour or so...
All good for the next week, here.
I remember when that used to happen.I hate these press releases.
It's like two primary election candidates from the same party going at each other's throats with mudslinging and attack ads, but then once the primary election is over, they both play nice to provide support for the party.
The Channel owners want something in return for not taking all their other channels like MVPD's are forced to with traditional sat and cable.Look at the price of locals in the Flex packs. They are $10. When locals were sold as a pack before, they were $5. Looks like a big price increase to me.
But that is not a deal breaker in negotiations; often done at the request of the channel as part of goodwill upon striking a new deal.It could also be that Tribune wanted the national WGN to be placed on a channel under 100 and grouped with locals. Growing up, WGN, WPIX, and WSBK, and WTBS were all grouped with the local stations as distinct from cable channels.
It could also be that Tribune wanted the national WGN to be placed on a channel under 100 and grouped with locals. Growing up, WGN, WPIX, and WSBK, and WTBS were all grouped with the local stations as distinct from cable channels.