I agree with most of what you said except spending more money on higher spec cabling. That's no different than using 91+ octane gasoline on a vehicle designed to run on 87. It doesn't increase performance and is a waste of money. Companies put a lot into r&d to know what works and what doesn't. There's a whole list of approved equipment that will give you 100% reliable service. Even using the canare connectors, imo would reduce performance because power is being sent down the wire (for the main receiver) and you're reducing it's conductivity. Probably an extremely small amount but it would never be as good as direct contact with the copper. But as far as self installing goes I completely understand. It's done your way and in most cases probably better than the tech would of done because unfortunately there's probably more techs out there that do sloppy work than there are that do clean work like myself and hipkat.
It's more of a thing where you have to try it to see because remember the approved equipment list might mean it needs to meet the minimum of the specs needed but remember, this is personal spending and not talking about spending from the business level since it's obvious for techs and even DISH, they would want to pay the lowest they can to meet the specs needed since it's about the bottom line. There is a reason the Canare connectors are rated high and heavily used as you may look at it as reducing connectivity but how often does your bare conductor actually contact everything that is 360 degrees as there will be parts of the conductor that will not touch anything but in this case, the crimped pin will have 100% coverage of the conductor itself, atleast on the inside. I forgot all the details of why using the pin is better as far as the signal quality goes but it could also be the materials used in the connector as Blue Jeans Cable would not be using the Canare connector if they were not good. Some sellers of Canare would show this:
"Most F connectors on the market utilize a coaxial cable's solid inner conductor as the plug's center contact pin. This design can cause near and long term problems from center conductor nicks, bending, dielectric migration, metal fatigue and contact corrosion. Furthermore, this type of commonly installed F connector may also produce signal degradation, outages, poor picture quality, RF leakage problems and most importantly - an expensive service call.
To meet the growing demands of advanced Digital Broadband equipment, Canare has developed the world's first precision, highly reliable 75 ohm F Connector. Electromechanically stable (nickel over brass body, high quality tapped threads, extra wide torque nut, gold crimp pin, extra long crimp sleeve), our FP-C is quick to install using the same Canare strip & crimp tools as our standard 75 ohm BNC and RCA plugs.
Canare true 75 ohm F Connectors are impedance matched with excellent Return Loss characteristics and can easily handle future "Smart House" RF broadband multimedia networks to 1 GHz and beyond. Will mate with SCTE approved standard F receptacles."
and these are not new as they have existed for 23+ years since even what was said above was probably written 23+ years ago so there is a reason that people are still buying and using them but until one has used them, it's hard to say one way or another.
It could also because the tolerance in the specs is more tight among other things since it's no different that like if a connector is corroded, techs will generally just use elbow grease while others will use something like cramolin red or cramolin blue to deoxidize and remove the corrosion which is hard to explain until one actually used it as it does improve conductivity as well. Caig laboratories sells the same stuff as DeOxit. So maybe the better way to look at the investment is while both the approved list will work now, you have to look at it should there be problems a few years down the road so while the former might be cheaper, maybe spending that extra money might result in it being problem free. So there is no such thing as a 100% but 99.9% and maybe in reality, the extra money just adds more 9's after the decimal so you will get closer to 100% but ofcourse it depends how much one is willing to pay to be closer and it should be reasonable so maybe I should have said if the cost was only slightly more since it's obvious a bad idea to spend 5x to be better but if it was 5%-10%, it might be worth it and using 91+ octane in a vehicle to run on 87 is different because once it's burned, it's burned but in this case, your wire is still there so in the future, should the specs change and the wires still can handle the spec for whatever you need it for which could be satellite, cable or anything else for that matter, you can use the same wires without having to buy new wires again which at the end might actually cost more in total.
After thinking about it for a bit, this is what is shown on Markertek:
If you really think about it, it does increase the surface area because if you look at the pin, remember the pin would need to be bigger than the diameter of the copper conductor so basically pin is inside the female F connector, it will be a more tighter fit because it will be bigger in diameter than without the pin.
But this is what Blue Jeans Cable actually says about the cables and the connector:
Ever since the advent of cable television, coaxial RF ("radio frequency") television cables have been an essential part of most home video installations. However, today, rather than carrying analog signals which top out at a few hundred megahertz, RF cables are typically asked to do much more. In CATV systems, these cables typically now carry high-bandwidth digital cable content and broadband cable internet. In satellite TV applications, these cables often carry high-frequency digital signals from LNBs placed well away from the satellite receiver. For these sorts of requirements, a precision-engineered cable with low capacitance and tight impedance stability is the best way to make sure that the signal gets through every time, whether in the professional environment or in the home.
The typical F-connector for RF coax is designed more for quick installation in the field, for the cable TV installer, than for durability and reliability. Most F-connectors just pass the center conductor of the coax through the connector body, resulting in a less-than-dependable, corrosion-prone contact, often the cause of loss and intermittency. Conventional F-connectors are often only weakly attached to the coax braid, for a poor completion of the cable shield and a contact which is prone to vary in quality as the cable is handled, and can even be weakened by the mere act of screwing the connector into the jack. We use our favorite F-connector, the Canare FP-series, on our RF cables. These connectors use a gold-plated center pin for a firm, straight and corrosion-proof contact with the jack, and have a solid, nickel-plated brass body with deep, well-machined threads that ensure a connection which is both mechanically and electrically sound. The connector body is tightly crimped all around the circumference of the braid, to complete the shielding from cable tip to cable tip.
So anyways, I think the real reason for that route is yes, the other equipment might meet the specs but when it comes to electrical current or RF, you want to have as much of the original signal as possible on the output and obviously with all cables, there will always be a signal loss from the input to the output so if one delivered 98% of the original signal and the other delivers only 94% of the signal, it will still be different as far as performance is concerned and may mean the difference between a stable signal or not.