"What's new" list

  • Server Issues.

    We are very aware that there have been system issues the past few days. In troubleshooting the system, it has been determined that the issue is at our provider and is hardware related. As of 12:05 PM ET our provider has moved us to a new server.

    Things seem to be running better on this new server. However in trying to diagnose the issue (before finding out it was a hardware issue) we made some system changes which we need to undo. So if you find any issues or errors please let us know in the Operations Center Forum.

    Thank you for your patience! Sorry for the issue!
    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE

Tifosi

New Member
Original poster
Jun 24, 2004
4
0
Anyone have any ideas as to why dishnetwork doesn't release a list of changes/features of the software "upgrades"? Whenever a company offers an update for their program, they usually have a "what's new" option to see what the actual update includes. I sure would like to know what has been changed and if any of the "bugs" have been issued, specifically on my 522.

Thanks in advance for the input. :)
 
I think they like to give us something to do, going through all our lists of bugs and discovering whether or not it's fixed.

That, or they could be afraid of claiming something is actually "fixed."
 
AcuraCL said:
I think they like to give us something to do, going through all our lists of bugs and discovering whether or not it's fixed.

That, or they could be afraid of claiming something is actually "fixed."

I'll vote the latter.....
 
I think it's because:
A. They don't like to admit to the numerous problems their receivers ship with, and continue to have for months or years afterward.
B. They don't want to say a specific problem is fixed, when there's a good chance it isn't.
C. They actually have no official compilation of all the bugs/issues/missing features. There is no database. No cohesive plan in place. No system. They just wing it.
 
GaryPen said:
I think it's because:
A. They don't like to admit to the numerous problems their receivers ship with, and continue to have for months or years afterward.
B. They don't want to say a specific problem is fixed, when there's a good chance it isn't.
C. They actually have no official compilation of all the bugs/issues/missing features. There is no database. No cohesive plan in place. No system. They just wing it.

Gary I vote for C or was that 3 ok C-3 thats my final answer!

Bob
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Top