Stargazer said:
The DPP diplexer would be nice to have for each of the dual tuner receivers but at what kind of a cost? Probably at a price that would cause a lot of people to run the extra wire to the receiver instead of buying the diplexer seeing how an extra wire would probably be a lot cheaper.
IIRC the newer dual tuner devices have the DPP built in .. so no adapter at the receiver is needed.
Stargazer said:
Perhaps something that might be even better would be one wire coming from the switch at the dish to the house. At that point if they made a diplexer to split it to all the receivers at the house that would be a better solution than running two or three wires to the house to be split again two or three times. There would be less diplexers required this route although two wires would have to be run to each receiver instead of just one.
There is an issue of bandwidth. Right now Legacy uses 500 MHz from 950 to 1450 and DP uses two 500 MHz bands from 950 to 2150. That is to get one satellite to your receiver. Want to get two satellites on the cable? It might be tight (you can't go down to zero MHz). But the future is
three satellites. That isn't going to fit.
What I expect DP+ is doing is restacking the LNB. The low end feeds one satellite one polarity to one receiver and the high end feeds a second satellite and/or polarity. Basically the cable carries two legacy feeds stacked.
The good news is that the new DP+ Twin with two DP+ outputs and one DP input (for the second dish) will give you two cables from your dish location to the house. Basically a "DP+32" built in to the LNB.
JL