When the "levy" breaks, I'll have no place to stay and mama will have to move.The levy to break?The dam to burst?
When the "levy" breaks, I'll have no place to stay and mama will have to move.The levy to break?The dam to burst?
But are they viewable by a consumer. I dumped my 4DTV when the stream was shut down and you had to jump thru hoops in order to get any reception.
I posted this in another thread and the same logic may be applicable here: The news of the contract signing was leaked. Dish is under no obligation to appease customers by quickly providing channels that they weren't even supposed to know that contract terms were agreed on. Presume the contract states April 1 as the start date. That gives Dish almost a month to get the technical stuff taken care of, marketing department to make promotional stuff related to new channels/services/etc, and so on. The smart thing that Dish and ABC/Disney/ESPN could have done was denied, denied, denied that anything was final. We wouldn't be having this debate if they'd have done that.
Just to clarify I am told again (unofficially) they are getting them via fiber not satellite.
And then they would have had issues with the SEC for making material false statements to the public.
That's a stretch ! They can say "no contract is in effect yet" then (referring to the effective date). Sent from my d2lte using Tapatalk
The 301 was already on the the list. When I upgraded from a 301 to a 221K, years ago, I was told to recycle the 301....
the 301's only get replaced if it craps out. dish is not forcing anyone to swap their 301's yet unlike the other receivers in the list
I think the press released covered it. SEC network is launching in mid August and Dish is contracted to carry it at launch. I'm not really sure what else you meant by that.Okay then, what does the SEC say about acknowledging the existence of a contract between two publicly traded companies? Sent from my d2lte using Tapatalk
Okay then, what does the SEC say about acknowledging the existence of a contract between two publicly traded companies?
Sent from my d2lte using Tapatalk
On a serious note,what would be some of the advantages of fiber vs sat?
That's what I thought as well. Dish/Disney should have just denied or safer, said "no comment" when asked about a contract being finalized. SEC=Securities and Exchange Committee. You brought it up, remember? Sent from my d2lte using Tapatalk
A contract being in place removed the potential for a dispute and channels being pulled which has a huge potential impact on Dish and Disney in terms of revenue. Denying the existence of a contract when one is in place could induce people to sell the stock when they otherwise wouldn't. And that's why the SEC would get involved.Nothing ( unless it can have a "significant financial effect" and it would be the rare contract that meets this criteria.)
That's what I thought as well. Dish/Disney should have just denied or safer, said "no comment" when asked about a contract being finalized. SEC=Securities and Exchange Committee. You brought it up, remember? Sent from my d2lte using Tapatalk
NO ONE KNOWS! ASKING OVER AND OVER WON'T CHANGE THAT, PLEASE STOP.so when do you think everything will be done according to scott?
so when do you think everything will be done according to scott?