Thank you!!! And have a good dayOn the other hand, that post at least appears as if he is at least trying to make himself a little more coherent.
If so, I applaud the attempt, and hope he continues to try to do better.
I also notice today is his birthday! Happy birthday Ken!
Well heres the rub, there is only so much bandwidth to go around, and some of it is more suited to certain things then others. It became apparent in the early 20th century that usage had to be regulated and it was divvied up and has continued to be divided among different uses accordingly. Now since it was decided that regulation was needed they had to make an agency to decide the rules, the FCC. As new technology becomes available they have to decide where the bandwidth is going to come from. As to the "hams" telling them they couldnt have more bandwidth, couldnt be further from the truth though they have an orginization that can bring concerns to the FCC just like the NAB represents the broadcasters in the country. Fact is if the FCC body decides that frequency needs to be used for something else it will re-allocate it. If the FCC decides that there is a need to use a frequency (lets use tv frequencies for the example here since this is what the repack is all about) for something that is being used more, or there is more of a need of the new item intended to take use of that bandwidth then was there it will do so after hearing whatever arguments and whatever debate they have. So i guess what im saying is the frequencies that are ours to use are only ours because the regulating body says it is, just like Hams usage is based off of licence privileges, and so on.
