Social Feed

rtt2
Supporting Founder
Last reply · posted in Old VOOM CHIT CHAT Archives
Setbacks Mount at Cablevision
By George Mannes
Senior Writer
9/28/2004 2:22 PM EDT
URL: http://www.thestreet.com/tech/georgemannes/10185118.html

Cablevision (CVC:NYSE) said Tuesday that it would miss the deadline it had previously set for spinning off its satellite TV service.


But Cablevision CEO Jim Dolan said Tuesday that the spinoff was still on track. "Yes, it is going to happen," Dolan told the audience at Merrill Lynch's Media & Entertainment conference. "We believe we are very close to actually achieving the spin."

Cablevision's shares rose 33 cents Tuesday to $19.78. On Monday, shares in the Long Island-based cable operator fell $1.42, or 6.8%, in the wake of a Friday night disclosure that three executives, including the company's acting principal accounting officer, had resigned their posts.

In a filing at the Securities and Exchange Commission Tuesday, Cablevision said it expected to complete the spinoff for its Rainbow Media Enterprises division in the fourth quarter. Previously, the company had said it expected that the deal turning Rainbow into a separate, publicly held company would be completed in the third quarter, which ends Thursday.

Rainbow includes not only Voom, Cablevision's fledgling satellite service focusing on high-definition television, but also the American Movie Classics, The Independent Film Channel and WE: Women's Entertainment programming services and the Clearview Cinemas movie theater chain.

As Cablevision noted in its filing, the company has already received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service indicating that the spinoff will qualify as a tax-free transaction, and has completed the financing plan for Rainbow. As Cablevision has pointed out before, the company said the spinoff still requires the SEC to declare the relevant paperwork effective, as well as final approval from Cablevision's board.

Wall Street has generally been pessimistic about the outlook for Voom's success, with analysts such as Sanford C. Bernstein's Craig Moffett arguing that the faster Voom goes out of business, the better it will be for Cablevision shareholders.

With Cablevision giving no reason last week for the executive resignations, outsiders filled in the blank with explanations ranging from innocent to ominous. One theory was that incoming CFO Michael Huseby was engaging in the run-of-the-mill guard-changing that is common among incoming corporate executives, while another linked the resignations to an SEC inquiry that followed Cablevision's disclosure in June 2003 of accounting irregularities in its programming unit.

After talking with Cablevision personnel, UBS analyst Aryeh Bourkoff reported Monday that the resignations were unrelated to the impending Rainbow spinoff. "Also, while CVC remains under a formal SEC investigation, the SEC did not require that these resignations occur, according to the company," reported Bourkoff, who has a buy rating on Cablevision's stock.

Bourkoff noted that at Huseby's previous employer, Charter (CHTR:Nasdaq) , he helped navigate the company through its "clearance" by the SEC. "We believe Huseby may be following a similar strategy at Cablevision, in order to work diligently toward an SEC clearance of CVC," wrote Bourkoff.

A Cablevision spokesman declined to comment Tuesday.
2 Replies · 2217 views
P
*Pure* vs. *Impure* cable plays

rtt2 said:
Setbacks Mount at Cablevision
By George Mannes
Senior Writer
9/28/2004 2:22 PM EDT
URL: http://www.thestreet.com/tech/georgemannes/10185118.html

Cablevision (CVC:NYSE) said Tuesday that it would miss the deadline it had previously set for spinning off its satellite TV service.


But Cablevision CEO Jim Dolan said Tuesday that the spinoff was still on track. "Yes, it is going to happen," Dolan told the audience at Merrill Lynch's Media & Entertainment conference. "We believe we are very close to actually achieving the spin."

Cablevision's shares rose 33 cents Tuesday to $19.78. On Monday, shares in the Long Island-based cable operator fell $1.42, or 6.8%, in the wake of a Friday night disclosure that three executives, including the company's acting principal accounting officer, had resigned their posts.

In a filing at the Securities and Exchange Commission Tuesday, Cablevision said it expected to complete the spinoff for its Rainbow Media Enterprises division in the fourth quarter. Previously, the company had said it expected that the deal turning Rainbow into a separate, publicly held company would be completed in the third quarter, which ends Thursday.

Rainbow includes not only Voom, Cablevision's fledgling satellite service focusing on high-definition television, but also the American Movie Classics, The Independent Film Channel and WE: Women's Entertainment programming services and the Clearview Cinemas movie theater chain.

As Cablevision noted in its filing, the company has already received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service indicating that the spinoff will qualify as a tax-free transaction, and has completed the financing plan for Rainbow. As Cablevision has pointed out before, the company said the spinoff still requires the SEC to declare the relevant paperwork effective, as well as final approval from Cablevision's board.

Wall Street has generally been pessimistic about the outlook for Voom's success, with analysts such as Sanford C. Bernstein's Craig Moffett arguing that the faster Voom goes out of business, the better it will be for Cablevision shareholders.

With Cablevision giving no reason last week for the executive resignations, outsiders filled in the blank with explanations ranging from innocent to ominous. One theory was that incoming CFO Michael Huseby was engaging in the run-of-the-mill guard-changing that is common among incoming corporate executives, while another linked the resignations to an SEC inquiry that followed Cablevision's disclosure in June 2003 of accounting irregularities in its programming unit.

After talking with Cablevision personnel, UBS analyst Aryeh Bourkoff reported Monday that the resignations were unrelated to the impending Rainbow spinoff. "Also, while CVC remains under a formal SEC investigation, the SEC did not require that these resignations occur, according to the company," reported Bourkoff, who has a buy rating on Cablevision's stock.

Bourkoff noted that at Huseby's previous employer, Charter (CHTR:Nasdaq) , he helped navigate the company through its "clearance" by the SEC. "We believe Huseby may be following a similar strategy at Cablevision, in order to work diligently toward an SEC clearance of CVC," wrote Bourkoff.

A Cablevision spokesman declined to comment Tuesday.

The problem with analyst coverage of CableVision (in fact of cable companies in general) is that *pure* plays (just MSOs or just content) are always treated better than *impure* or *mixed* plays (MSOs that also are content providers or cable/satellite MSOs like CVC).

Let's look at Comcast (NASDAQ NMS: CMCSK/CMCSA). While Comcast does provide *some* content (Comcast SportsNet in the Greater Philadelphia and Baltimore/Washington DMAs, CN8 in the Greater Philadelphia and Baltimore DMAs), they are largely ancillary to their MSO business, and recognized as such, both inside and outside the company (and especially on Wall Street).

However, when Comcast went after Disney, they were roundly savaged, not just by Disney defenders, but by most stock analysts covering the company. Why? Because Disney is not an MSO, and Comcast would become a *mixed* play.

*Mixed* plays inevitably collect bad press, especially when it comes to cable. TWC (formerly AOL Time Warner) had to go so far as changing its *name* because the merger with AOL was so roundly panned (and this was *before* the accounting and other problems with AOL itself became known!).

CVC has *always* been a mixed play, even prior to VOOM's launch, and the lack of purity has *always* had analysts screaming. Four years ago (well prior to VOOM's launch), analysts wanted CVC to divest itself of the content providers and become a pure MSO.

However, CVC sees (and has always seen) one great big nightmare as a pure MSO play; it has fewer subscribers compared to the larger MSOs (read TWC and Comcast), and they are mostly surrounded by Time-Warner. Holding on to those content providers prevents TWC from acquiring CVC (due to agreements still in force dating back to the formation of TWC, well before the merger with AOL), and the analysts' screaming has also kept them out of the arms of Comcast (even though CVC's management has no issues with either Brian Roberts or Comcast, they want to remain an independent company).

What the spinoff od the non-MSO assets appears to be (at least to me) is the surrender of CVC itself (not necessarily the spun off Rainbow Group holdings, including VOOM). The analysts win because CVC will become a pure MSO play, and, with the meltdown of Adelphia, the largest MSO that is not in merger play in one way or another (all forecasting on Adelphia seems to favor a *cherry-picking contest* between Time-Warner, Comcast, and Charter). The analysts want another MSO (a healthy one, rather than the rotting corpse that is Adelphia) in merger play, and CVC, without the content-provider baggage, would be ideal.
S
PGHammer,

this was a good read. Even after the spin-off isn't CVC still connected to the Rangers and Knicks and to some degree to Rainbow programming through Fuse and other cable channels. Also, everything the CVC does technically has to be done through Rainbow Media Facilities. Aren't the Knicks and the Rangers bigger losers of revenues that could also drive down CVC?
jamieh1
Last reply · posted in DIRECTV Programming Forum
DIRECTV Stream/Internet added Ch 4105 SportsGrid
268 Replies · 38700 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand and KyL416
K
Now live:
4101 Yahoo! Sports Network
4121 DP World Tour
4195 F1 Channel
4196 MotoGP Channel
K
Now live:
4275 Law & Crime
4364 Military Makeover Channel
K
Game Show Central is now live on channel 4342
K
Now live:
4101 Yahoo! Sports Network
4121 DP World Tour
4195 F1 Channel
4196 MotoGP Channel
It only took them 41 days to announce it
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony
K
Now testing:
AyM Sports 3 USA
Best Bets TV powered by VSiN
CBS Sports Golazo Network
CBS Sports HQ
Judge Judy
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 2 views
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in What's Cooking?
We have a Breakfast and Dinner thread so... :)
Continuing from the Breakfast thread, found Cornbread mix so ...
Yellow Cornbread Mix
2 Hatch Green Chiles -diced
1 Egg
2/3 cup of milk
add to greased pan
Bake for 400f 20-25 minutes(From instructions)
now to put together and try... this to go with pinto beans...
5449 Replies · 336091 views
TRG
TRG
Club sandwich and corn chowder. Iced tea.
dfergie
Chili dog bowl, water… (homemade chili)
TRG
TRG
Leftover wanton soup and pork fried rice. Water.
dfergie
IMG_5955.webp

Sweet tea…
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby and TRG
TRG
TRG
Tuna salad sandwich on toasted honey whole wheat bread with a handful of kettle chips. Water.
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68658 Replies · 2680237 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
I Wanna Talk About Me - Toby Keith
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
gms49ers
It's Easy - Boston
RaiderPower
Take It Easy On Me - Little River Band
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 49 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 288 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
2 Replies · 52 views
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

2 Replies · 56 views
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Jimbo
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

They will have to look at the switching sections to determine WHY 2 trains were on the same track ... at the same time.
dishstaller
Thought this article might be of interest to some of you who might travel via train.