Social Feed

Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
It's Tax Day and I understand that "Tea Parties" are happening all around the country.

I just looked out my office window and was surprised at what I saw. So I grabbed my camera and took some pictures.

Below is the Connecticut State Capitol and all the people having their "Tea Party"

The shot was taken from my office window which is on the 29th floor.

I sent a few of these pics over to our local NBC station. Looks like they might use them on the 5 and 6pm news. :)
33 Replies · 3502 views
A
It will be interesting to see how the main stream media reports about the Tea Parties tonite. If these large rallies were promoting Gay Marriage they would be lead stories on CBS, NBC, ABC.
I
Why doesn't everyone who believes the government is too big, too intrusive or spending too much money just sign a waiver exempting yourself, your family, and your household from paying taxes?

In return you waive any claim to police and fire protection, street repairs and public education. While we're at it, you can add forgoing protection from terrorism and foreign invasion, decline the benefits of any scientific and medical research, oh, and vow never to collect Social Security and Medicare. And to top it off, you'll also pay a fee to vote, since that is also paid for by taxes.

When are we going to forget about "what's in it for me" and get it into our thick skulls that we're all in this together and we sink or swim as a nation!
Ronnie-
They had several of these in small towns around here. I did not get a chance to go, but I doubt they were anything like some of the pics I have seen here or elsewhere
jwgreen68
Why doesn't everyone who believes the government is too big, too intrusive or spending too much money just sign a waiver exempting yourself, your family, and your household from paying taxes?

In return you waive any claim to police and fire protection, street repairs and public education. While we're at it, you can add forgoing protection from terrorism and foreign invasion, decline the benefits of any scientific and medical research, oh, and vow never to collect Social Security and Medicare. And to top it off, you'll also pay a fee to vote, since that is also paid for by taxes.

When are we going to forget about "what's in it for me" and get it into our thick skulls that we're all in this together and we sink or swim as a nation!
This country survived for many years without an income tax. As far as most of the programs you mentioned, those could be paid for by state sales tax. It is ludicrous to think that the abolishment of the federal income tax would lead to the shutdown of the federal government. If we stopped loaning money to third world nations, that we know we will never be repaid, we would have a surplus. Only a fool would believe that the social security program will be around when they reach retirement age. The big push for the taxpayer to invest his money wisely, is the governments attempt to move away from social security. Social Security is just another welfare program. Worried about the war on terrorism? If we stop sticking our nose into other countrys' affairs, terrorism would drastically drop.

Tea Party participants have the right to protest government. It is our duty to question the actions of our leaders. It's also your right to express your opinion.
M
It will be interesting to see how the main stream media reports about the Tea Parties tonite. If these large rallies were promoting Gay Marriage they would be lead stories on CBS, NBC, ABC.

What media do you follow that isn't 'mainstream?' You can't be referring to the cable news channel with the highest ratings... Or the radio talk show programs with the highest ratings. :rolleyes: These guys like to talk about the media like its something other than the thing thats making them loads of money.

Don't have a problem with the politics, just the "the whole world is out to get me, they're always picking on me" mentality.
yaz96
This country survived for many years without an income tax. As far as most of the programs you mentioned, those could be paid for by state sales tax. It is ludicrous to think that the abolishment of the federal income tax would lead to the shutdown of the federal government. If we stopped loaning money to third world nations, that we know we will never be repaid, we would have a surplus. Only a fool would believe that the social security program will be around when they reach retirement age. The big push for the taxpayer to invest his money wisely, is the governments attempt to move away from social security. Social Security is just another welfare program. Worried about the war on terrorism? If we stop sticking our nose into other countrys' affairs, terrorism would drastically drop.

Tea Party participants have the right to protest government. It is our duty to question the actions of our leaders. It's also your right to express your opinion.

An interesting piece reflecting on the Tea Party.

oUR vIEW: discombobulation, government, spending, conservatives - Opinion - Colorado Springs Gazette, CO

Our View: Discombobulation
Comments 28 | Recommend 5
April 15, 2009 - 4:56 PM
NAMENEWSPAPER
In House

It was good of Republicans and self-professed "conservatives" at Wednesday's TEA parties to protest massive federal spending. It was a righteous action with a righteous message.

Unfortunately, some of the rhetoric and vibe at various TEA parties made clear the fact conservatives remain discombobulated, devoid of a clear direction or a unified understanding of where this country should go to maximize freedom and minimize government. Mixed in with an extraordinary and mostly sincere theme of advocacy for lower taxes and less spending was advocacy for a variety of big government Republican schemes. Though the Colorado Springs party stuck mostly to fiscal matters, speakers, protesters with signs, and supportive radio talk show hosts at some events throughout the country sprinked the TEA the parties with messages about illegal immigrants, and advocacy of American domination and foreign intervention to spread "democracy."

One Colorado radio host, broadcasting from the TEA Party at our state capitol, began the morning by inviting nearby Democrat Gov. Bill Ritter to join him on air. After the governor declined, the host insulted Ritter for not protecting him from illegal immigrants. Weren't these protests about less government intervention in the course of human events, not more? No serious, limited government conservative wastes time and effort fretting about the comings and goings of immigrants and whatever civil disputes they may have with the federal government regarding their residency status. Serious conservatives want a government so small it can't possibly worry about peaceful, law-abiding immigrant laborers working at will in private agreements with private employers. Real conservatives would leave that concern to union goons, the folks who've traditionally advocated third party interference in employee-employer relationships.

Sean Hannity explained the TEA parties were about lower taxes and less spending, of course, but were also to promote "American Exceptionalism" (read: "American imperialism"?).

Anthony Gregory, writing for LewRockwell.com, said Hanity and his wannabes promote "the idea that the American national warfare state is just and good, even holy, and that we oppressed patriots will not countenance a president insufficiently enamored of American imperial glory. Presumably, as today's conservatives see it, the American colonists dumping British tea were also upset that the British Crown was inadequately boastful of English Exceptionalism, cutting spending on the British Empire and coddling the enemies of England's occupying armies." Touché. Gregory went on to explain that interventionist conservatives shouldn't complain about Obama, who is increasing military spending and exceeding Bush in advocating "secretive, unchecked presidential power, widening the war into Pakistan and redirecting military resources toward uses of active belligerence."

His article enumerates various contradictions of some conservative tax protesters who staged no opposition to the big government, interventionist, debt-funded policies embarked upon under the Republican brand.

At the Colorado Springs rally, a young Gazette opinion contributor explained to a mostly Republican crowd in this mostly Republican city the right wing hypocrisy that facilitates big government spending and taxing.

"We rail against the pork-barrel spending and the tax increases coming out of Washington, but we're totally complacent when it comes to things happening in our own backyard, even though these are the things fueling the destructive taxes and out-of-control spending," said Dan Cole, by all appearances a genuine limited-government conservative.

Cole explained that Colorado Springs, known as a bastion of Republicanism, asked the federal government for four times more money from Obama's stimulus package than was requested by Denver's predominantly Democrat leaders. Cole said the board of El Paso County Commissioners, comprised entirely of Republicans, pays roughly $80,000 a year in dues to Colorado Counties Inc. - a group that consistently lobbies to maintain the state's anti-free enterprise business personal property tax.

"So while we're all ticked that the Democrats in Denver opposed and defeated this tax cut, it was our tax dollars down here in Republican El Paso County that helped make that defeat politically possible," Cole said.

Most of the Republicans and "conservatives" who protested Wednesday were well-meaning, patriotic citizens angry at Obama. Yet they never protested a Republican president who more than doubled our federal debt and mired us in efforts to gift other countries with freedom and economic development. Too many of them want less government, while asking government to fence out Mexicans. They want less from government, but more American imperialism. Unless they change their vision, embracing a non-partisan and genuine love of freedom through limited government, Obama is their man. He's a lot like George Bush, a big government president under a different brand.
Van
Van
I heard that the demographics for the tea party members was heavily republican and heavily 50 yrs old and up, I'd be interested to find out what it is actually but I can tell you that after listening to Hanity a few times on the way home from work three weeks ago I'd say that a good portion would have to be closet case klans men and women afraid that the presidential limo will be riding on 22's and pumpin out window shakin base.
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68656 Replies · 2680145 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
FTA4PA
Detroit Rock City - Kiss
  • Love
Reactions: dishstaller
sdfntx
I Care About Detroit - Smokey Robinson & the Miracles
dishstaller
I Wanna Talk About Me - Toby Keith
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 37 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 274 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
2 Replies · 44 views
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

2 Replies · 49 views
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Jimbo
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

They will have to look at the switching sections to determine WHY 2 trains were on the same track ... at the same time.
dishstaller
Thought this article might be of interest to some of you who might travel via train.