Social Feed

DishDave49

Last reply Jun 23, 2009 · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Dish Satellite 129 low signal or my Dish1000 equipment-

Has anyone noticed a low signal on Satellite 129?

I've had no problem over the last three years.

Over the last week however, I have noticed my picture temporarily freezing and on rare occasion turns to a yellow screen. The audio would often continue with no problem. My satellites are 110, 119, & 129.

In the New Mexico area(zip88011) I'm seeing signals from the Point Dish screen at 69db, 63db, & 50db resp.

After looking over my Dish1000 3 LNB setup for good pointing, I checked in with dishnetwork for any local provider problems.

No problems were found but the 50db signal level must be at my system threshold.
Dish has waved the $49.95 service charge and will have a technician come out and check my equipment Sunday(6/21). My single connection into the house is good. I suspect I have a compromised cable or connection at the antenna. My Satellite 129 LNB may be on the way out but we will see. I'm looking to keep the bad LNB if it is replaced.

5 Replies · 9181 views

Load Replies (5) Reply Legacy View

Jim5506

Jun 20, 2009

Probably just need to tweak the dish to favor 129 a little more.

I currently have heavy overcast with light rain in Lubbock, TX and I'm getting 50 on 129, but no breakups.

With clear skys my 129 readings are in the upper 50's on a D1000 dish.

Current readings

110 - 53
119 - 53
129 - 49

MikeD-C05

Jun 20, 2009

You either can repeak it or get an upgrade to a dish 1000.2 sat dish ,which is bigger & wider and you can get a stronger signal on 129.

DishDave49

Jun 21, 2009

I was glad to see my Dish Network Technician arrive right on time at 8 a.m.(Sun). I'm now free to follow my other father's day obligations.

My antenna setup did have a few problems. The original Dish 1000 antenna installation and equipment has improved over the last few years. My Dish 1000 LNB dual & single setup which was a DPP twin/DP dual Combo was replaced with a Dish 1000.2 DPP triple. I also had a corroded connecter at the ground block which was also replaced. No charge for the upgrade.

My satellite signals on the Point Dish screen is now:

110 --> 60 db
119 --> 64 db
129 --> 54 db

We will be starting our Monsoon season soon. Batten down the hatches; wish me luck.

PBX_Guy

Jun 21, 2009

The key to good results on the 129 (and 110) birds is for the installer to make sure that the mast pipe is perfectly dead-level plumb. When trying to sight-in multiple birds at multiple elevations and azimuths, there's no such thing as "close enough" - as the common pivot point, the mast has to be exact.

You have two adjustments for the 119, Elevation and Azimuth, but both 110 and 129 are set with one common adjustment: Skew.

If adjusting the skew pulls you off-peak of the 119, or
if adjusting the skew does not peak-in both 110 and 129 at the same setting, or
after adjusting the skew you have to re-tweak the azimuth/elevation settings (at the expense of 119 signal levels)
then
the mast pipe is not perfectly level.
Go back and level the mast (in all planes, left/right, forward/back)
and start over

Alaska John

Jun 23, 2009

I am located at the north end of Southeast Alaska (roughly half way between Seattle and Anchorage). We use separate 1 meter dishes to see 110 and 119 (although there are some 90 cm dishes that bring in less signal strength and have some channel loss during heavy weather). Recently I was asked to aim a dish at 129w for a Dishnetwork customer who wanted the HD channels. I reloaded my Birdog with the two 129 satellite settings but was unable to see a signal when tuned to either 129 satellite. I tuned the Birdog to 148 and aimed the dish in the general vicinity of 129 and was able to see signal strength. I peaked the dish there and the customer hooked the dish to his HD receiver. It was the right satellite but the strength wasn't strong enough to stay locked into a signal. The dish is a 1 meter metal dish with a new DP LNB. I have a 1.2 meter fiberglass dish (that I use for Starband) and can get pretty good signal strength on my Birdog (set at 148), but haven't hooked to a receiver yet. I may get a chance tomorrow to do that and then I will post my results. Is the signal strength sent by the 129w satellite less than 110 or 119? Also, why doesn't by Birdog see the 129w with that satellite dialed into it? Do I need to reload the Birdog?

Alaska John

dishstaller

Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

Last reply 2 minutes ago · posted in The Chit Chat Club

You can't even trust the cost per ounce info in grocery stores anymore

I'm surprised Walmart hasn't banned this guy from all of their stores. He has been on their CASE the past few months.

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/f3zr37ekgKM?feature=share

64 Replies · 610 views

Load Replies (64) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: NYDutch

Juan

Wednesday at 11:17 AM

dishstaller said:
I'm surprised Walmart hasn't banned this guy from all of their stores. He has been on their CASE the past few months.

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/f3zr37ekgKM?feature=share

When walmart set a price...they weigh the container and the product...the product label only shows the weight of the product...I am sure if you brought your own plastic baggies to bring the product home you could get the cheaper price

dishstaller

Wednesday at 11:47 AM

Juan said:
When walmart set a price...they weigh the container and the product...

Then they are stupid. Everyone knows that the price per ounce should be the price per ounce of actual product.

Reactions: Jimbo

Juan

Wednesday at 1:38 PM

dishstaller said:
Then they are stupid. Everyone knows that the price per ounce should be the price per ounce of actual product.

You are paying for the whole thing

telstar_1

Wednesday at 2:22 PM

Juan said:
You are paying for the whole thing

Well, the bag can't weigh that much, right? But by law food product packaging must display the actual net weight of the product, i.e., the contents of the container, so by any logic, if not law, a store's stated per-ounce cost should reflect that figure. But since there's not any law regulating shelf statements, a store can say whatever it wants without violating any rules. So I guess the answer is more consumer legislation. Or simply caveat emptor.

Reactions: (((Garyd)))

Jimbo

Wednesday at 6:26 PM

telstar_1 said:
Well, the bag can't weigh that much, right? But by law food product packaging must display the actual net weight of the product, i.e., the contents of the container, so by any logic, if not law, a store's stated per-ounce cost should reflect that figure. But since there's not any law regulating shelf statements, a store can say whatever it wants without violating any rules. So I guess the answer is more consumer legislation. Or simply caveat emptor.

I would think that the Vendor/Maker of the product would have a say in it, showing the Correct weight ...
You would think it would be in the contract.

I do look at the ounces of items, but unless its way off, I don't check the math, may have to start now.

Remember when you use to get a 13.5 oz bag of Chips .... Thats a PARTY Size now.

Reactions: AZ.

TRG

Wednesday at 6:41 PM

Jimbo said:
I would think that the Vendor/Maker of the product would have a say in it, showing the Correct weight ...
You would think it would be in the contract.

I do look at the ounces of items, but unless its way off, I don't check the math, may have to start now.

Remember when you use to get a 13.5 oz bag of Chips .... Thats a PARTY Size now.

I remember when a pound of coffee was 16oz. Now its 12oz, they don't call it a pound anymore and its three times the cost of the 16oz pound.

Reactions: (((Garyd))), dishstaller, slow_poke_pete and 1 other person

Jimbo

Wednesday at 7:05 PM

TRG said:
I remember when a pound of coffee was 16oz. Now its 12oz, they don't call it a pound anymore and its three times the cost of the 16oz pound.

Well, they don't call it a pound anymore ....

Ice cream is that way too, use to be a half gallon, now its 1.5 quart or some say 48 oz

Reactions: Bobby

cp2k

Today at 2:52 PM

I've noticed some of this too, and a bigger trend I've noticed lately is that buying bigger quantities isn't always cheaper anymore. Take Pepsi for example. At several of our local stores it is cheaper per ounce to buy the 1.25l bottles (and buy more of them) than it is to buy the 2 liter bottles when you break it down to a per ounce price. Also, Food Lion is bad about jacking up prices before Buy one get one free sales. They'll have a BOGO offer where you get the second one free, but raise the price for one to nearly the same price or higher than it would be to just buy two of the item at another store outright.

Another big trap people fall for are Dollar General and Dollar Tree. Typically their quantities are smaller, and priced higher per ounce than what you would see at Wal-Mart for example. I saw someone in line the last time I was in Dollar Tree with 6 items at $1.50 each. Four of them could've been had for less than $1 at Wal-Mart. The crazier thing is the Dollar Tree is in a shopping strip mall located in the Wal-Mart parking lot.

Jimbo

Today at 2:58 PM

cp2k said:
I've noticed some of this too, and a bigger trend I've noticed lately is that buying bigger quantities isn't always cheaper anymore. Take Pepsi for example. At several of our local stores it is cheaper per ounce to buy the 1.25l bottles (and buy more of them) than it is to buy the 2 liter bottles when you break it down to a per ounce price. Also, Food Lion is bad about jacking up prices before Buy one get one free sales. They'll have a BOGO offer where you get the second one free, but raise the price for one to nearly the same price or higher than it would be to just buy two of the item at another store outright.

Another big trap people fall for are Dollar General and Dollar Tree. Typically their quantities are smaller, and priced higher per ounce than what you would see at Wal-Mart for example. I saw someone in line the last time I was in Dollar Tree with 6 items at $1.50 each. Four of them could've been had for less than $1 at Wal-Mart. The crazier thing is the Dollar Tree is in a shopping strip mall located in the Wal-Mart parking lot.

Convenience ... I guess.
Personally, I'm not bouncing around stores to save .50 cents

(((Garyd)))

11 minutes ago

Jimbo said:
Well, they don't call it a pound anymore ....

Ice cream is that way too, use to be a half gallon, now its 1.5 quart or some say 48 oz

Is it real Ice-cream?

Jimbo

10 minutes ago

(((Garyd))) said:
Is it real Ice-cream?

Is it Real Ice cream ???
Depends on what your talking about.

(((Garyd)))

7 minutes ago

Jimbo said:
Is it Real Ice cream ???
Depends on what your talking about.

Most don't have any milk in them

Jimbo

2 minutes ago

(((Garyd))) said:
Most don't have any milk in them

REAL Ice Cream Does have Milk ... many of them are just Frozen desserts, pretending to be Ice Cream.

View all replies (64)

Bruce

Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter

Last reply 11 minutes ago · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

Traditional/Streaming Live TV Providers Losses, 3rd Quarter 2026 Edition

Comcast is the first to report, with a massive 274,000 loss in video subscribers.

In the 3Q of 2016, Comcast had 21.42 million video subscribers and was the #1 provider, now at 10.39 million and is the #3 Provider, YTTV is #2 ( who also surpassed DirecTV-8 Million and Dish-under 5 Million), Charter/Spectrum is #1.

Comcast Just Lost 274,000 TV Customers & 144,000 Internet Customers In Just Three Months | Cord Cutters News

Comcast Corporation reported its third-quarter 2026 results on October 22, showing continued erosion in its domestic residential broadband internet and video customer bases as competitive pressures intensified across the connectivity market. The company recorded a net loss of 144,000 domestic...

cordcuttersnews.com

9 Replies · 215 views

Load Replies (9) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: Howard Simmons

ncted

Today at 7:45 AM

Comcast called fiber pricing "irrational" because the ROI is over three years. What is irrational to me is Comcast internet is based on lines they put in the ground decades ago at this point, for the most part. Is copper that much more expensive to maintain?

brice52

Today at 11:26 AM

ncted said:
Comcast called fiber pricing "irrational" because the ROI is over three years. What is irrational to me is Comcast internet is based on lines they put in the ground decades ago at this point, for the most part. Is copper that much more expensive to maintain?

yes. even copper lines in a house degrade over 70 years, I doubt coax would last that long. Fiber Optic on the isp side will last over 70 years with very dedgration

Reactions: (((Garyd))), osu1991 and MikeD-C05

(((Garyd)))

15 minutes ago

brice52 said:
yes. even copper lines in a house degrade over 70 years, I doubt coax would last that long. Fiber Optic on the isp side will last over 70 years with very dedgration

The fiber coming in to the house looks like 300 ohm old TV wire I think that is the weak point.

Jimbo

11 minutes ago

(((Garyd))) said:
The fiber coming in to the house looks like 300 ohm old TV wire I think that is the weak point.

The weak point would be the connection between the outdoor feed and the indoor feed.

Jimbo

11 minutes ago

brice52 said:
yes. even copper lines in a house degrade over 70 years, I doubt coax would last that long. Fiber Optic on the isp side will last over 70 years with very dedgration

Copper lines are fine ... until it hits the AIR.

View all replies (9)

jamieh1

Last reply Today at 3:16 PM · posted in DIRECTV Programming Forum

NHL game channels

Looks like DTV made a deal. I'm now getting it on ch 650. The tv promise slate is gone.

4 Replies · 62 views

Load Replies (4) Reply Legacy View

Mr Tony

Today at 9:13 AM

A few teams got a deal. Was posted yesterday in the Directv update thread

https://www.satelliteguys.us/xen/th...p-data-10-21-2026.402660/page-44#post-5109885

KyL416

Today at 1:56 PM

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...-louis-blues-regional-channels-302918682.html

DIRECTV today announced a new multi-year distribution agreement with the National Hockey League for Hurricanes Hockey Network, Blue Jackets Hockey Network, Wild+, and Blue Note+ pregame, postgame, and in-game live sports services.

Each of the four channels will be available to DIRECTV streaming and satellite customers who live in each team's NHL-designated home territory and subscribe to Choice and higher packages, and each U-verse customer in those same regions who subscribes to U200 and above.

This agreement also provides distribution rights to each NHL team to all of DIRECTV FOR BUSINESS's thousands of sports bars, restaurants, fitness clubs, and other commercial venues located within each team's respective region.

DIRECTV has recently obtained regional or local rights to provide 76 of the 81 U.S.-based NHL, NBA, or MLB franchises to their local fans, including multi-year agreements for 23 U.S.-based hockey teams.

Reactions: Mr Tony

jamieh1

Today at 2:01 PM

Now let's get the NBA game channels going.

KyL416

Today at 3:16 PM

I'm trying to figure out the math that got them to 76 of 81 US based teams:

DIRECTV has recently obtained regional or local rights to provide 76 of the 81 U.S.-based NHL, NBA, or MLB franchises to their local fans, including multi-year agreements for 23 U.S.-based hockey teams.

77 Phillies
78 76ers
79 Flyers (Next year will mark 30 years since DTV last had local Philly sports after the demise of SportsChannel Philly, at this point the lack of NBCS Philly is not a dealbreaker for most of their remaining PA, Southern NJ and Delaware customers)
80 Stars -- Not listed in the NHL release as KDFI/KDFW only has 17 simulcasts the rest are Prime only
The lack of Flyers and Stars would match the 23 of 25 US based NHL teams.

81 Ducks? -- KCOP is listed in the NHL release, but between them and KTTV only 65/77 games will be available, the other 12 will be Prime only, and there's no OTA option at all for viewers in the Santa Barbara or San Diego DMAs
Unlike the 4 NHL distributed teams (Blues, Blue Jackets, Hurricanes, Wild), the Stars and Ducks are available at no additional cost for Prime subscribers

In the NHL release they are counting the LIL coverage of OTA teams for "local rights", even if all of the outer markets aren't available (i.e. Golden Knights and Mammoth on The Spot Idaho subchannels, the Panthers on Laff Fort Myers and Ducks outside of the LA DMA), so at least for the home markets they have the following OTA NBA teams:
Heat - WPLG/10 Miami and WTCN-CD/43 West Palm Beach -- slate up on channel 654, but I doubt they are going to add a Heat feed just for Fort Myers unless the Heat make it available cheaply, they didn't even do it for the Panthers who won the Stanley Cup in 2024 and 2025
Hornets - WAXN/64 Charlotte, WMYV/48 Greensboro, WRDC/28 Raleigh and the satellite only WZBJ/24 Roanoke -- slate up on channel 648 for the rest of the Carolinas
Magic - WRDQ/27 Orlando and WMOR/32 Tampa -- slate up on channel 656 for the non-carried subchannel markets Jacksonville, Gainesville, Panama City and Tallahassee along with the Florida portions of the Mobile-Pensacola DMA who doesn't have any OTA carriage.
Hawks - WANF/46 Atlanta -- slate up on channel 646 for the rest of Georgia and Alabama
Bucks - WVTV-D2/24 Milwaukee and the satellite only WISC-D2/14 Madison -- slate up on channel 669 for the rest of Wisconsin
Suns - KAZF/32 Phoenix -- Nothing for Tucson, Yuma or New Mexico
Jazz - KJZZ/14 Salt Lake City -- Nothing for the areas of Eastern Washington, Eastern Oregon, Idaho and Montana that used to get it on an alternate feed of Root Northwest
Pistons - Available outside of Detroit on 663-2
Thunder - Available on 675
Pelicans - Available on 676-6
Mavs - Available outside of Dallas on 676-8
Blazers - Available outside of Portland on 688-1

Bruce

Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter

Last reply Today at 2:50 PM · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

How things have changed

I was reading this article

Cable TV ‘cord-cutters’ became the majority in 2022

The steady decline of cable and broadcast television, and the rise of streaming services, reached a sort of inflection point over the past year. Last summer, for the first time, streaming ser…

thehill.com

That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.

Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.

895 Replies · 71742 views

Load Replies (895) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: MikeD-C05

Bruce

Yesterday at 8:58 AM

And again, 15 months in a row, streaming wins-

Cable and Broadcast added together-36.4%

Streaming with a massive 49.6%, 13.2% higher than Broadcast/Streaming.

Reactions: MikeD-C05 and Howard Simmons

Jimbo

Yesterday at 11:08 AM

Bruce said:
And again, 15 months in a row, streaming wins-

Cable and Broadcast added together-36.4%

Streaming with a massive 49.6%, 13.2% higher than Broadcast/Streaming.

View attachment 194983

Your Still Thrilled about all this ?

These numbers will Never be accurate as many people use Both still ...

You have services like Hulu Live and You Tube TV that do, what you call Cable, but they ARE Streaming, so Which is is ?

Does it get counted 2x as both Streaming and Cable ?

Reactions: MikeD-C05

Jimbo

Yesterday at 1:16 PM

But they ARE Streaming as well, so they Should be counted as both, which would make the Streaming numbers even More prominate.

Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...

Bruce

Yesterday at 1:31 PM

Jimbo said:
But they ARE Streaming as well, so they Should be counted as both, which would make the Streaming numbers even More prominate.

Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...

Same.

Ratings for streaming content is extremely accurate, since the service knows who is watching what and when, when we hit ok on our remotes.

Ratings for Broadcast/Cable shows has always been a estimate.

Jimbo

Yesterday at 3:11 PM

Bruce said:
Same.

Ratings for streaming content is extremely accurate, since the service knows who is watching what and when, when we hit ok on our remotes.

Ratings for Broadcast/Cable shows has always been a estimate.

If I flip thru shows on an app, 3-4 in a few minutes, does that still show that I watched the whole episode ?

If I watch the Super Bowl for 5 minutes, does that count as watching the Super Bowl ?
Is it the same if I just watched the Commercials.

Bruce

Yesterday at 3:30 PM

Jimbo said:
If I flip thru shows on an app, 3-4 in a few minutes, does that still show that I watched the whole episode ?

If I watch the Super Bowl for 5 minutes, does that count as watching the Super Bowl ?
Is it the same if I just watched the Commercials.

Nielsen Streaming Ratings: Third-party measurement firm Nielsen tracks U.S. streaming viewership, releasing weekly reports that measure total minutes viewed across major television sets, broken down by program (such as original, acquired, and movie content) rather than minute-by-minute audience retention curves.

Reactions: llokey and Jimbo

savarese04

Today at 1:09 PM

Jimbo said:
Your Still Thrilled about all this ?

These numbers will Never be accurate as many people use Both still ...

Nobody is "happy" or "sad" about this. Simply posting data in an non-editorialized way has nothing to do with anyone's feelings.

The data on the streaming side is immensely accurate, I'm guessing to the millisecond. Plus most people likely have not turned off data sharing and thus they are grabbing a huge swath of data. Much more accurate than cable which relies on a smaller sample size and probably not to the second.

In either case, nobody is getting "double counted" because it's usage based. If I watch 100 minutes of content and 30 minutes is on Youtube and 20 minutes on Disney and 50 minutes on YTTV, it's going to show up as 30%, 20%, 50% slices of my personal pie respectively.

Jimbo said:
Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...

Nielsen does. If you go into the settings of any of your streaming accounts, you can turn off the option to share to usage data with their third party measuring service - Nielsen.

Jimbo

Today at 2:50 PM

savarese04 said:
Nobody is "happy" or "sad" about this. Simply posting data in an non-editorialized way has nothing to do with anyone's feelings.

The data on the streaming side is immensely accurate, I'm guessing to the millisecond. Plus most people likely have not turned off data sharing and thus they are grabbing a huge swath of data. Much more accurate than cable which relies on a smaller sample size and probably not to the second.

In either case, nobody is getting "double counted" because it's usage based. If I watch 100 minutes of content and 30 minutes is on Youtube and 20 minutes on Disney and 50 minutes on YTTV, it's going to show up as 30%, 20%, 50% slices of my personal pie respectively.

Nielsen does. If you go into the settings of any of your streaming accounts, you can turn off the option to share to usage data with their third party measuring service - Nielsen.

I have turned some off, not others ...

View all replies (895)

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Today at 2:32 PM · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Xbox Rumored Game Pass Overhaul

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PAhrLR-6dec

Direct YouTube Link - Xbox Rumored Game Pass Overhaul
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed

0 Replies · 5 views

Replies Reply Legacy View

TRG

Pub Member / Supporter

Last reply Today at 2:12 PM · posted in Computers and Gadgets

Starlink Router question

I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.

1 Replies · 20 views

Load Replies (1) Reply Legacy View

b4pjoe

Today at 2:12 PM

TRG said:
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.

If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.

Scott Greczkowski

Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge

Last reply Today at 1:51 PM · posted in The Chit Chat Club

Song Name Game Part 3!

Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne

Get it?

An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....

68593 Replies · 2677132 views

Load Replies (68593) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: c-spand

hwkn

Today at 2:37 AM

TAKE On ME-A-Ha

Reactions: RaiderPower and ClarkGable

ClarkGable

Today at 6:51 AM

On Broadway - George Benson

Reactions: gms49ers and RaiderPower

Bobby

Today at 10:54 AM

Stay In Time - Off Broadway USA

harshness

Today at 11:03 AM

Just In Time - Tony Bennett

gms49ers

Today at 1:51 PM

Just Get Through This Night - Styx

View all replies (68593)

Linus Tech Tips

Today at 1:32 PM · posted in Linus Tech Tips

dbrand Forced me to do This Review

Time for another AWESOME video from Linus Tech Tips!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN953UW8iJ8

Direct YouTube Link - dbrand Forced me to do This Review
Linus on Facebook
The LTT Store

0 Replies · 10 views

Replies Reply Legacy View

techristian

Last reply Today at 12:45 PM · posted in Free To Air (FTA) Discussion

NEED SUGGESTIONS FOR NEW FTA BOX

IS Amiko MIRA 3 any good ???
Can you recommend the best to cover all bases. NO BEEPS on certain channels 101w (NEWSMAX ,NEWS NATION), a clock that keeps working STEADY for timed recording ,solid unit with good lifespan. My Amiko died AND my Linkbox has NO Favorites Button and BEEPS on many channels. Picking up 105 west with a NEW SHED IN THE Way with 6 foot Cband ..95 percent quality ...unbelievable.

1 Replies · 37 views

Load Replies (1) Reply Legacy View

primestar31

Today at 12:45 PM

techristian said:
IS Amiko MIRA 3 any good ???
Can you recommend the best to cover all bases. NO BEEPS on certain channels 101w (NEWSMAX ,NEWS NATION), a clock that keeps working STEADY for timed recording ,solid unit with good lifespan. My Amiko died AND my Linkbox has NO Favorites Button and BEEPS on many channels. Picking up 105 west with a NEW SHED IN THE Way with 6 foot Cband ..95 percent quality ...unbelievable.

Have you tried a new power brick on your Amiko? It's slim pickings out there anymore. The FTA market in the US has pretty much been abandoned.

This would likely be your best bet, and Rick is a good seller. I've never had any issues with him:

Ricks Satellite Satellite Receivers

Reactions: FTA4PA

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Today at 12:32 PM · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Updates on Artemis III?

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nrzwDeQ-WV0

Direct YouTube Link - Updates on Artemis III?
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed

Search

Search

Social Feed

Dish Satellite 129 low signal or my Dish1000 equipment-

You can't even trust the cost per ounce info in grocery stores anymore

Traditional/Streaming Live TV Providers Losses, 3rd Quarter 2026 Edition

Comcast Just Lost 274,000 TV Customers & 144,000 Internet Customers In Just Three Months | Cord Cutters News

NHL game channels

How things have changed

Cable TV ‘cord-cutters’ became the majority in 2022

Xbox Rumored Game Pass Overhaul

Starlink Router question

Song Name Game Part 3!

dbrand Forced me to do This Review

NEED SUGGESTIONS FOR NEW FTA BOX

Updates on Artemis III?