Social Feed

calrich

Last reply May 27, 2010 · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Versus on Dish

I'm new here and I know this has probably already been covered at length but I can't find the specific thread. Dish currently offers Versus (with NHL) on their America's Top 250 and higher. Is there any possibility that it will offered on a lower tier package in the future or on a sports package?

19 Replies · 4096 views

Load Replies (19) Reply Legacy View

chuckster_dude

May 21, 2010

Sure, anything is possible.

Is it likely? No. I've been hoping they would do that since the NHL started on VS but it never happens. They did move it down for 3 months late last year when DirecTV was having their dispute with VS.

Best move would be for the NHL to go back to the ESPN networks. Rumor is that the NHL is considering that.

radtech

May 22, 2010

chuckster_dude said:
Sure, anything is possible.

Is it likely? No. I've been hoping they would do that since the NHL started on VS but it never happens. They did move it down for 3 months late last year when DirecTV was having their dispute with VS.

Best move would be for the NHL to go back to the ESPN networks. Rumor is that the NHL is considering that.

I was hoping they would go back to ESPN also, but no cigar! When the NHL first switched to Versus, the word I heard was that ESPN did not want the NHL anymore. It seems that they could get higher ratings from TV Poker Matches. Go figure!

Anyway, Versus is on a lower package on D*, Choice Extra I believe. What I plan to do is carry the Top 250 package during April, May, and June to get the Stanley Cup Playoffs on Versus and then drop down to the Top 120 or 200. I will watch my local team during the regular season on my RSN.

Ed

Yespage

May 22, 2010

As a side note, if you wanted to go to 120, that is $15 a month difference from 250... or $180 a year more for 250 than 120. Could just get Center Ice and keep 120. You'll get almost all the games.

SpaethCo

May 22, 2010

chuckster_dude said:
Best move would be for the NHL to go back to the ESPN networks. Rumor is that the NHL is considering that.

The current contracts go to the end of the 2010-11 season, so they will indeed be negotiating for TV rights again over the next year.

That said, I doubt ESPN will get the bid -- they have too many commitments to their other contracts to do the NHL justice. They already have to commit resources to college and NFL football, college and NBA basketball, NASCAR, and MLB baseball. There is no way they could match the current 2 prime-time games a week that Versus is delivering.

The cycling, fishing, Indycar, cage match, buck hunting channel may not have the distribution of ESPN, but at least they treat the NHL as a league that matters -- something that ESPN wasn't willing to do when they lost the bid back in 2005.

Okay, Let's Talk About This Like Adults: "How ESPN Nearly Destroyed the NHL on TV" or "Why the NHL Should Never Go Back to ESPN"

grb

May 25, 2010

espaeth said:
The current contracts go to the end of the 2010-11 season, so they will indeed be negotiating for TV rights again over the next year.

That said, I doubt ESPN will get the bid -- they have too many commitments to their other contracts to do the NHL justice. They already have to commit resources to college and NFL football, college and NBA basketball, NASCAR, and MLB baseball. There is no way they could match the current 2 prime-time games a week that Versus is delivering.

The cycling, fishing, Indycar, cage match, buck hunting channel may not have the distribution of ESPN, but at least they treat the NHL as a league that matters -- something that ESPN wasn't willing to do when they lost the bid back in 2005.

Okay, Let's Talk About This Like Adults: "How ESPN Nearly Destroyed the NHL on TV" or "Why the NHL Should Never Go Back to ESPN"

It was all about money and ratings -- VS needed a major sport contract for growth and outbid ESPN, which only submitted a token bid. When ESPN had the NHL they ranted and raved about NHL hockey in HD and now they barely mention the sport. It seems they decided to make a move to the "Entertainment" segment of the "Entertainment and Sports" in the ESPN acronym and reduce the sports content.

In my opinion watching guys (and/or gals) play poker is neither sports nor entertainment, but I guess it works for them and is relatively cheap programming...but I now watch a lot less ESPN than I used to.

chuckster_dude

May 26, 2010

grb said:
It was all about money and ratings -- VS needed a major sport contract for growth and outbid ESPN, which only submitted a token bid.

Things have changed for the NHL. The last 2 Stanley Cup Finals have gotten relatively good numbers on NBC and the Winter Classics have been well-watched. I would think this year's Cup numbers should be just as solid since it features two of the largest US markets (Chicago and Philly).

If you want to be seen as a major sport, you have to be on the channel that carries major sports. ESPN would give the NHL that. And if I remember correctly, ESPN and ESPN2 carried more than 2 games a week of the NHL that VS carries.

wolfjc

May 26, 2010

radtech said:
I was hoping they would go back to ESPN also, but no cigar! When the NHL first switched to Versus, the word I heard was that ESPN did not want the NHL anymore. It seems that they could get higher ratings from TV Poker Matches. Go figure!

Anyway, Versus is on a lower package on D*, Choice Extra I believe. What I plan to do is carry the Top 250 package during April, May, and June to get the Stanley Cup Playoffs on Versus and then drop down to the Top 120 or 200. I will watch my local team during the regular season on my RSN.

Ed

I think that VS only has the first two games and the rest are on NBC.

gjh3260

May 26, 2010

wolfjc said:
I think that VS only has the first two games and the rest are on NBC.

Versus is carrying games 3 and 4 in Philly.......the rest are on NBC

Saturday, May 29 at Chicago, 8 p.m. NBC, CBC, RDS
Monday, May 31 at Chicago, 8 p.m. NBC, CBC, RDS
Wednesday, June 2 at Philadelphia, 8 p.m. VERSUS, CBC, RDS
Friday, June 4 at Philadelphia, 8 p.m. VERSUS, CBC, RDS
*Sunday, June 6 at Chicago, 8 p.m. NBC, CBC, RDS
*Wednesday, June 9 at Philadelphia, 8 p.m. NBC, CBC, RDS
*Friday, June 11 at Chicago, 8 p.m. NBC, CBC, RDS

grb

May 26, 2010

chuckster_dude said:
Things have changed for the NHL. The last 2 Stanley Cup Finals have gotten relatively good numbers on NBC and the Winter Classics have been well-watched. I would think this year's Cup numbers should be just as solid since it features two of the largest US markets (Chicago and Philly).

If you want to be seen as a major sport, you have to be on the channel that carries major sports. ESPN would give the NHL that. And if I remember correctly, ESPN and ESPN2 carried more than 2 games a week of the NHL that VS carries.

I agree 100%. Giving VS the contract was a poor decision by the NHL -- in fact it was a sellout. Bettman went for the bigger bucks and disregarded the exposure factor, which counteracted all the prior efforts of the NHL to expand the U.S. audience.

Bettman was already saying, immediately after that great U.S. vs. Canada Olympic title game, that the NHL may not participate in the 2014 Olympics. He just doesn't get it -- it isn't about the revenue he feels the NHL lost by not receiving money from the Olympics, it's about the exposure and the growth of the hockey fan base. Until he gets that through his thick head, his actions will never be beneficial to the NHL.

Greg Bimson

May 26, 2010

grb said:
I agree 100%. Giving VS the contract was a poor decision by the NHL -- in fact it was a sellout. Bettman went for the bigger bucks and disregarded the exposure factor, which counteracted all the prior efforts of the NHL to expand the U.S. audience.

It wasn't the first time the NHL went for money instead of exposure. Remember SportsChannel US?

The reality is the "exposure factor" was horrible on ESPN when ESPN was too busy exposing, in no particular order, NFL football, NCAA football, NBA basketball, NCAA basketball, Major League Baseball and Poker. And let's not forget SportsCenter.

ESPN offered NO money; just a revenue sharing agreement like NBC. So it is either no guaranteed money from ESPN or $50 some million a year from Versus, who would be happy to make the NHL their marquee product. More on that later...

grb said:
Bettman was already saying, immediately after that great U.S. vs. Canada Olympic title game, that the NHL may not participate in the 2014 Olympics. He just doesn't get it -- it isn't about the revenue he feels the NHL lost by not receiving money from the Olympics, it's about the exposure and the growth of the hockey fan base. Until he gets that through his thick head, his actions will never be beneficial to the NHL.

Bettman is looking for some kind of concessions.

Think about it. This year has been the absolute best for the NHL in terms of TV ratings. If a network is unhappy with the Olympic break because it may impact the terms of their deal, this is about getting the best deal from a network. If NBC and Versus (soon to be both owned by Comcast) want the exposure, and they also have the Olympics, then they will want to offer more money and make the NHL take the Olympic break.

Just for common knowledge, I normally do NOT take the side of Bettman. Heck, I've gone off plenty of times regarding the complete idiocy of the NHL from 1933 to 2005. There have been many missteps both on and off the ice so that the game didn't and doesn't get wider appeal.

For once, the NHL will be going into a contract negotiation with the upper hand.

...and that choice can either be with the ESPN family of networks and the NHL can be buried on ESPN3.com or ESPN Classic, which would be a no-brainer if someone in the Disney chain offered any money. Or it can be with the partner that has been offering money (Versus), which is owned by Comcast, which will soon run NBC. And everyone wants the Winter Classic now. It's called leverage.

AdamGott

May 27, 2010

Yespage said:
As a side note, if you wanted to go to 120, that is $15 a month difference from 250... or $180 a year more for 250 than 120. Could just get Center Ice and keep 120. You'll get almost all the games.

I never did a one for one comparison but all of the games that I wanted to watch that were also on VS. were blacked out to me on Center Ice.

Reactions: Yespage

View all replies (19)

meStevo

Lifetime Supporter

Last reply 14 minutes ago · posted in The Sports Section

NFL 2026-2027 Season

Schedule drops tomorrow. Mandatory mini camps in June. Hall of Fame game August 6th.

139 Replies · 3030 views

Load Replies (139) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: Jimbo and dfergie

HipKat

Tuesday at 4:27 PM

Balls
Bears. Took care of the elite Seahawks defense in a great performance.
NFC North. The entire division is 2 games above .500
Lions. Finally handed an L to that weird Minnesota team. Good vibes for Jack Campbell.
Pitt. Took the lead of the division convincingly.
Bengals vs Titans game. Fireworks game. Not sure it was a well-played game, but it sure was fun. JoeyB with 6 scores... and 4 turnovers.
Denver. They keep winning, man. Payton is a baller of a coach.
Packers. Thorough beatdown of the hard-to-read Panthers.
Jags. Demolished the hapless Colts.
Rams. The Super team finally wins back-to-back games.

Goats
Vikings. Took their first L. I know their D is insane, but their offense is setting back football to the 1950's.
Cowboys. Lost a 2-score lead vs. the Gardner Minshew-led Cards... at home. Embarrassing.
Browns. Playing for the division lead by scoring 6 points.
Bucs vs Falcons game. Setting modern football back to the ice age. Honorable mention to Tua Penix err ... Michael Tagov .... well, you know what I mean.
Bengals fans acting like Burrow just won the MVP after his performance. I get it. 6 scores is awesome. But. He also turned the ball over 4 times and required overtime to beat the 1-win Titans. So spare me the parade.
Chiefs. Not because they lost. It was a close game decided on the last play vs. a divisional rival on the road. That's always rough. But because of their whining over the CLEAR flag they got on the would-be winning play. They are used to getting the calls, and when they don't, they complain. Honorable mention to Mahomes for this quote: "I mean, at the end of the day, you have to go with whatever is called, but a lot of times in those big moments, the little stuff doesn't get called like that"... so you admit it was a penalty?? Just shut up, man.
Colts. They began the fire sale earlier in the week, and it showed. This team is cooked; Daniel Jones should go to the bench, and Steichen will be fired pretty soon.
Chargers. Wow. That's all I got.
Miami. For having the Pats sort of on the ropes and letting them go.
Eagles. Another team that should consider selling some assets. They are going nowhere.

Reactions: Howard Simmons and Mike0616

Howard Simmons

Wednesday at 11:24 AM

HipKat said:
Balls
Bears. Took care of the elite Seahawks defense in a great performance.
NFC North. The entire division is 2 games above .500
Lions. Finally handed an L to that weird Minnesota team. Good vibes for Jack Campbell.
Pitt. Took the lead of the division convincingly.
Bengals vs Titans game. Fireworks game. Not sure it was a well-played game, but it sure was fun. JoeyB with 6 scores... and 4 turnovers.
Denver. They keep winning, man. Payton is a baller of a coach.
Packers. Thorough beatdown of the hard-to-read Panthers.
Jags. Demolished the hapless Colts.
Rams. The Super team finally wins back-to-back games.

Goats
Vikings. Took their first L. I know their D is insane, but their offense is setting back football to the 1950's.
Cowboys. Lost a 2-score lead vs. the Gardner Minshew-led Cards... at home. Embarrassing.
Browns. Playing for the division lead by scoring 6 points.
Bucs vs Falcons game. Setting modern football back to the ice age. Honorable mention to Tua Penix err ... Michael Tagov .... well, you know what I mean.
Bengals fans acting like Burrow just won the MVP after his performance. I get it. 6 scores is awesome. But. He also turned the ball over 4 times and required overtime to beat the 1-win Titans. So spare me the parade.
Chiefs. Not because they lost. It was a close game decided on the last play vs. a divisional rival on the road. That's always rough. But because of their whining over the CLEAR flag they got on the would-be winning play. They are used to getting the calls, and when they don't, they complain. Honorable mention to Mahomes for this quote: "I mean, at the end of the day, you have to go with whatever is called, but a lot of times in those big moments, the little stuff doesn't get called like that"... so you admit it was a penalty?? Just shut up, man.
Colts. They began the fire sale earlier in the week, and it showed. This team is cooked; Daniel Jones should go to the bench, and Steichen will be fired pretty soon.
Chargers. Wow. That's all I got.
Miami. For having the Pats sort of on the ropes and letting them go.
Eagles. Another team that should consider selling some assets. They are going nowhere.

Mahomes is the biggest cry baby I have ever seen. He thinks he's privileged or something.

Reactions: HipKat, gms49ers, Mike0616 and 2 others

meStevo

Wednesday at 12:14 PM

Just the same vilification as players like Brady experienced, a product of their success and largely overblown (just like them 'getting all the calls').

Reactions: Mike0616 and AZ.

Yespage

Wednesday at 1:31 PM

Howard Simmons said:
Mahomes is the biggest cry baby I have ever seen. He thinks he's privileged or something.

Well you see him more because he is incredibly talented. And yes, typically players try to spin things being in their favor. This isn't cricket where sportsmanship (except in Australia) is expected.

Reactions: Mike0616

HipKat

Wednesday at 8:13 PM

Howard Simmons said:
Mahomes is the biggest cry baby I have ever seen. He thinks he's privileged or something.

He wants to be Brady

Reactions: Howard Simmons, AZ. and Mike0616

HipKat

Wednesday at 8:14 PM

meStevo said:
Just the same vilification as players like Brady experienced, a product of their success and largely overblown (just like them 'getting all the calls').

The only people who deny what Brady got from the officials are Brady fans

Reactions: Howard Simmons, AZ. and Mike0616

gms49ers

Thursday at 10:02 AM

The NFL, for some time, has protected the marquee quarterbacks. Brady, Mahomes, Allen, Burrow - they all get the calls.
The lower tier QBs don't seem to get the same benefit. For instance, some of the hits that Darnold took from Chicago on Monday night would have been a flag frenzy if any of the marquee QBs were hit like that. And I am not in any way a fan of anything Seahawks related. I am a fan of balanced officiating - and that hasn't been the case for a while.

My team is not immune to this - Fred Warner laid some vicious hits in the Commanders game that I thought should have been flagged - one was, but they picked it up.

Not a good look on NFL officials.

Reactions: Yespage, AZ., Howard Simmons and 2 others

Yespage

14 minutes ago

HipKat said:
The only people who deny what Brady got from the officials are Brady fans

I doubt that. The Patriots offense shifted to a more quick release setup to lessen risk of him getting hit in the second half of his career. And Brady also won 3 Super Bowls before he was considered a GOAT player to be protected by the refs. No one really knew who Brady even was with the tuck call. That was all about Belichick knowing which refs to hog tie family members of to get critical calls when needed.

View all replies (139)

b4pjoe

Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge

Last reply 23 minutes ago · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

Paramount+ and HBO Max to merge

HBO Max and Paramount+ to Combine Into One Streaming Platform, Paramount Says HBO Brand Will 'Operate With Independence'

Paramount+ right now is at $13.99 for the ad-free with Showtime content and HBO MAX is now $22.99 for the 4K ad-free plan so together they are $36.98. By the time this goes through the approval process which I am sure will fly right through you would probably looking at $50 per month for the ad-free 4K plan combined.

59 Replies · 1641 views

Load Replies (59) Reply Legacy View

Jimbo

Oct 6, 2026

b4pjoe said:
The name is being changed to Skydance and all of Paramount+, Showtime, DIscovery+, and HBO MAX streaming content is rumored to be merged into one streaming service.

So, what happens if you only want 1 or 2 of those, can you still get them individually ?

Juan

Oct 7, 2026

Jimbo said:
So, what happens if you only want 1 or 2 of those, can you still get them individually ?

The samething when you only wanted one or 2 channels on cable

Jimbo

Oct 7, 2026

Juan said:
The samething when you only wanted one or 2 channels on cable

Not hardly ....
I'm not trying to get 200 channels.

Juan

Oct 7, 2026

Jimbo said:
Not hardly ....
I'm not trying to get 200 channels.

But Paramount has a different agenda..to empty your wallet

Reactions: slow_poke_pete and dishstaller

dishstaller

Oct 7, 2026

Juan said:
But Paramount has a different agenda..to empty your wallet

There's a lot of that going around these days. It seems every time I turn around my Youtube Premium is going up another dollar.

slow_poke_pete

Oct 14, 2026

dishstaller said:
There's a lot of that going around these days. It seems every time I turn around my Youtube Premium is going up another dollar.

use an adblocker :biggrin

b4pjoe

Oct 14, 2026

slow_poke_pete said:
use an adblocker

There on no ad blockers on my TV. Some people prefer watching content on a TV. :eeek

Reactions: MikeD-C05, Bobby, osu1991 and 1 other person

ncted

Oct 14, 2026

b4pjoe said:
There on no ad blockers on my TV. Some people prefer watching content on a TV.

There are ways to block ads for your TV and other devices on your home network if you are willing to put in the effort.

Reactions: slow_poke_pete

MikeD-C05

Oct 14, 2026

ncted said:
There are ways to block ads for your TV and other devices on your home network if you are willing to put in the effort.

Do say, How?

b4pjoe

Oct 14, 2026

ncted said:
There are ways to block ads for your TV and other devices on your home network if you are willing to put in the effort.

I am not willing as they keep changing the data and you keep having to block everything all over again. That is why I get the ad-free versions of the streaming services I use which includes Youtube.

Reactions: osu1991, dishstaller and Bobby

dishstaller

Oct 14, 2026

b4pjoe said:
I am not willing as they keep changing the data and you keep having to block everything all over again. That is why I get the ad-free versions of the streaming services I use which includes Youtube.

That is pretty much my take as well. At this point in my life I am willing to spend $$ to make my life more simple.

Reactions: Jimbo, reubenray, osu1991 and 1 other person

osu1991

Oct 14, 2026

MikeD-C05 said:
Do say, How?

Pihole

Reactions: MikeD-C05

osu1991

23 minutes ago

DC Studios Shocker: James Gunn, Peter Safran Stepping Down with Marvel Alum Jeremy Latcham to Take Over

The duo were believed to be safe amid the Skydance takeover of Warner Bros., but now have a former Kevin Feige protege taking over their division.

www.hollywoodreporter.com

DC Shocker: James Gunn, Peter Safran Out as Co-Chairmen, Marvel Veteran Jeremy Latcham to Lead Comic Book Studio

James Gunn and Peter Safran are stepping down as co-presidents of DC Studios, and they will be replaced by Jeremy Latcham.

variety.com

And it begins. Looking to trim $2 billion there will be a lot of people out of jobs.

View all replies (59)

Bruce

Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter

Last reply 34 minutes ago · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

Traditional/Streaming Live TV Providers Losses, 3rd Quarter 2026 Edition

Comcast is the first to report, with a massive 274,000 loss in video subscribers.

In the 3Q of 2016, Comcast had 21.42 million video subscribers and was the #1 provider, now at 10.39 million and is the #3 Provider, YTTV is #2 ( who also surpassed DirecTV-8 Million and Dish-under 5 Million), Charter/Spectrum is #1.

Comcast Just Lost 274,000 TV Customers & 144,000 Internet Customers In Just Three Months | Cord Cutters News

Comcast Corporation reported its third-quarter 2026 results on October 22, showing continued erosion in its domestic residential broadband internet and video customer bases as competitive pressures intensified across the connectivity market. The company recorded a net loss of 144,000 domestic...

cordcuttersnews.com

32 Replies · 1257 views

Load Replies (32) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: Howard Simmons

Foxbat

Friday at 4:26 PM

Meanwhile, my neighbor 300' away has gigabit fiber, and I'm stuck with copper solutions.

Reactions: Jimbo, MikeD-C05 and Bobby

savarese04

Saturday at 1:58 PM

Foxbat said:
Meanwhile, my neighbor 300' away has gigabit fiber, and I'm stuck with copper solutions.

similar situation. almost every neighborhood around me has fiber, but our 3 block area. I called AT&T and was like, how hard is it to bring fiber over about 200 feet (I am closest to the folks with fiber and can see it on the poles from my front door); crickets and very frustrating.

Reactions: Foxbat

Jimbo

Yesterday at 7:53 AM

savarese04 said:
similar situation. almost every neighborhood around me has fiber, but our 3 block area. I called AT&T and was like, how hard is it to bring fiber over about 200 feet (I am closest to the folks with fiber and can see it on the poles from my front door); crickets and very frustrating.

Chances are, they told you about how hard and long it would take for them to place that fiber to your area ... Poles needed to be placed and what not ...

ncted

Yesterday at 8:54 AM

Jimbo said:
Chances are, they told you about how hard and long it would take for them to place that fiber to your area ... Poles needed to be placed and what not ...

Or the people who own the poles closest to the house won't let AT&T attach.

Jimbo

Yesterday at 9:36 AM

ncted said:
Or the people who own the poles closest to the house won't let AT&T attach.

People that Own the poles ?
That would be ATT Or the Power Company depending on the situation ... easily figured out by looking at the Tag on All Poles.

navychop

Yesterday at 10:09 AM

ncted said:
Or the people who own the poles closest to the house won't let AT&T attach.

Might not be an option, due to easements. I can't see governments allowing public property (easements) for exclusive use by just one company.

I $uppo$e there'$ a way….

ncted

Today at 9:35 AM

Jimbo said:
People that Own the poles ?
That would be ATT Or the Power Company depending on the situation ... easily figured out by looking at the Tag on All Poles.

Sorry, Companies or whoever. Power company, cable company, competing phone companies, governments. AT&T sued Nashville a while back because of how pole attachment works there.

Jimbo

Today at 9:40 AM

ncted said:
Sorry, Companies or whoever. Power company, cable company, competing phone companies, governments. AT&T sued Nashville a while back because of how pole attachment works there.

Really ?
The poles always have a tag on them showing who owns them, up here its either the Power Company or the Phone company ...

edit:
Utility and telephone poles in Nashville, Tennessee are owned primarily by two entities: [1]

Nashville Electric Service (NES): Owns approximately 80% of the utility and telephone poles across its Davidson County service area.
- AT&T: Owns the remaining 20% of the poles (roughly 104,000 poles). [1, 2, 3]

Other telecom and cable providers, such as Comcast or Google Fiber, do not typically own the physical poles; instead, they rent attachment space on NES- or AT&T-owned poles through pole-attachment agreements. [1, 2]

Reactions: Foxbat

reubenray

Today at 1:09 PM

In my area Cox (now Spectrum) has run everything underground instead of on poles.

Jimbo

34 minutes ago

reubenray said:
In my area Cox (now Spectrum) has run everything underground instead of on poles.

Thats good, the neighborhood generally look better with buried plant ... until someone puts a shovel into the line planting the Spring Garden.

Reactions: reubenray

View all replies (32)

Bruce

Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter

Last reply 40 minutes ago · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

How things have changed

I was reading this article

Cable TV ‘cord-cutters’ became the majority in 2022

The steady decline of cable and broadcast television, and the rise of streaming services, reached a sort of inflection point over the past year. Last summer, for the first time, streaming ser…

thehill.com

That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.

Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.

914 Replies · 73164 views

Load Replies (914) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: MikeD-C05

Bruce

Today at 5:36 AM

According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

Reactions: Howard Simmons

Jimbo

Today at 8:00 AM

Bruce said:
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

That thier own stupidity ...

They make it hard to find the game when its on FOX 1 game, then FS1, then on Tru or some other little ity biyy channel that people rerely watch and can't find. (I don't know if FOX is TRU or not, but thats what I'm saying, they put games on obscure channels and expect people to easily find it and watch.

Reactions: Howard Simmons, dishstaller and AZ.

Bruce

Today at 8:17 AM

Jimbo said:
That thier own stupidity ...

They make it hard to find the game when its on FOX 1 game, then FS1, then on Tru or some other little ity biyy channel that people rerely watch and can't find. (I don't know if FOX is TRU or not, but thats what I'm saying, they put games on obscure channels and expect people to easily find it and watch.

Every WS game was on the main Fox Broadcast Channel, what are you referring to?

Reactions: Howard Simmons, ncted, Bobby and 1 other person

AZ.

Today at 8:25 AM

Bruce said:
Every WS game was on the main Fox Broadcast Channel, what are you referring to?

Throughout the playoffs most games were not over the air. They were on FS1 or TrueTV, HBO, TBS....So without a sports package you need FS1, and the others you need a old school TV package. If I had to guess, close to 75% of playoff games were not on free local TV.

Reactions: Howard Simmons and Jimbo

Bruce

Today at 11:08 AM

AZ. said:
Throughout the playoffs most games were not over the air. They were on FS1 or TrueTV, HBO, TBS....So without a sports package you need FS1, and the others you need an old school TV package. If I had to guess, close to 75% of playoff games were not on free local TV.

But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.

Reactions: Howard Simmons and AZ.

Bobby

Today at 11:20 AM

Bruce said:
But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.

Last year it was the Dodgers and Bluejays. This year is was the Brewers and the Rays, two teams that never won a World Series. Last year the Dodgers were the former year champion, can they do a repeat against a Toronto team that looked unbeatable. That World Series was a classic between two teams that really wanted it. The highlight of this year was can Milwaukee go 4-0 like they did to the Dodgers, and they just about did.

Reactions: Howard Simmons and Foxbat

AZ.

Today at 1:09 PM

Bobby said:
Last year it was the Dodgers and Bluejays. This year is was the Brewers and the Rays, two teams that never won a World Series. Last year the Dodgers were the former year champion, can they do a repeat against a Toronto team that looked unbeatable. That World Series was a classic between two teams that really wanted it. The highlight of this year was can Milwaukee go 4-0 like they did to the Dodgers, and they just about did.

Yep ratings have lots to do with what teams are playing. Large market over smaller. Underdog teams people want to root for. But If you make it hard to watch all the playoffs, you will get less interest for the World Series.

Reactions: Howard Simmons

TRG

Today at 2:01 PM

Bruce said:
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

People are tired of watching the World Series without the Yankees. :devilish

Bruce

Today at 2:14 PM

AZ. said:
Yep ratings have lots to do with what teams are playing. Large market over smaller. Underdog teams people want to root for. But If you make it hard to watch all the playoffs, you will get less interest for the World Series.

Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.

Jimbo

42 minutes ago

TRG said:
People are tired of watching the World Series without the Yankees.

Not Me, I rather enjoy it ...

Jimbo

41 minutes ago

Bruce said:
Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.

Quick Question, WITHOUT Looking it up ...
Who played in the World Series last year ?

Jimbo

40 minutes ago

Bruce said:
Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.

True, but you had 2 Large Markets in it .

View all replies (914)

Antenna Man

Today at 4:42 PM · posted in Antenna Man

SiliconDust HDHomerun Network Tuner and DVR Review

Time for another AWESOME video from Tyler the Antenna Man!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGc0sC1L390

Direct YouTube Link - SiliconDust HDHomerun Network Tuner and DVR Review
AntennaMan's Website
AntennaMan on Facebook

0 Replies · 7 views

Replies Reply Legacy View

dfergie

Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!

Last reply Today at 4:41 PM · posted in The Chit Chat Club

Gas Price Info With National Gas Temperature Map

Stumbled across this ... http://www.gaspricewatch.com/USGas_ZipSearch.asp
I found no local prices, although it did show stations at my location...
Added these to this post...
USA National Gas Temperature Map
State By State Gasoline Taxes
Gas Buddy

Ethanol Free Stations

5571 Replies · 463071 views

Load Replies (5571) Reply Legacy View

Bobby

Saturday at 11:10 AM

Regular$5.399
Premium$5.899
Diesel$7.999
at Costco, Rohnert Park.

osu1991

Saturday at 11:49 AM

$3.55

reubenray

Saturday at 12:47 PM

$3.45 in Jane, MO.

Bobby

Today at 11:04 AM

Regular$5.299
Premium$5.859
Diesel$7.599
at Costco, Rohnert Park.

harshness

Today at 4:41 PM

Finally! Some big movement in California diesel pricing (and no, there is no such beastie as a diesel "winter formula").

Crude (combined pricing) is around $90/barrel now, so prices should have, at least, fallen in step with the crude futures.

View all replies (5571)

Ramy

Supporting Founder

Last reply Today at 4:38 PM · posted in The Sports Section

2026-27 NCAA College Football

Really excited for this season with Kentucky having a new coach and some really exciting recruits. Probably won't last long, but here's hoping this season is great.

195 Replies · 3726 views

Load Replies (195) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: Mike0616

osu1991

Today at 9:12 AM

View: https://youtu.be/tD8_OaxOxRg?si=m_fUTlFsBE3T_5E1

Reactions: Foxbat

Ronnie-

Today at 12:34 PM

College Football Playoff, ESPN agree to 5-year, $1.7 billion deal expanding field to 24 teams starting in 2027

The CFP field will have 12 teams this year, before doubling in 2027.

sports.yahoo.com

ESPN and the College Football Playoff (CFP) have agreed to a 5-year deal to expand the playoff from 12 to 24 teams.

The deal, worth $1.7 billion per ESPN's Heather Dinich, keeps ESPN as the broadcast partner.

The CFP announced the deal on Monday.

Reactions: Jimbo, meStevo, cp2k and 1 other person

cp2k

Today at 1:30 PM

Honestly, I would rather see an expanded bracketed playoff system than the current Conference Championship Game + playoff model we're using right now. The Conference Championships essentially allow two teams to beat up on each other, and then both typically are going to end up in the playoffs anyway unless it is one of the weaker or smaller conferences. Let them play it out on the field against others.

Jimbo

Today at 2:00 PM

cp2k said:
Honestly, I would rather see an expanded bracketed playoff system than the current Conference Championship Game + playoff model we're using right now. The Conference Championships essentially allow two teams to beat up on each other, and then both typically are going to end up in the playoffs anyway unless it is one of the weaker or smaller conferences. Let them play it out on the field against others.

Until the Big Ten changed thier alignment, (a couple years ago) ... it was not like that at all, the East side won most years the west side represented the Big Ten, but they may have been the team with the 4th best record ...
They finally changed that, to a single conference ... but yes, in most cases, both teams will get in ... now, its a certain both will get in ...

The biggest issue with the Conference Now is the Number of TEAMS .... WAY to Many.
It would take 2-3 YEARS to do a round robin where everyone would play one another ... How do you know how good a team is when teams don't play the same teams ?

Reactions: meStevo

meStevo

Today at 4:38 PM

Jimbo said:
They finally changed that, to a single conference ... but yes, in most cases, both teams will get in ... now, its a certain both will get in ...

Surprised you haven't made this claim yet.

View: https://x.com/RedditCFB/status/2119843536439005342?a=pI0NYBONwLj4vjRrQWo&s=20

View all replies (195)

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Last reply Today at 4:36 PM · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Data Centers Faced a 2026 Ballot Measure Tsunami #shorts

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5WOtjKIoErE

Direct YouTube Link - Data Centers Faced a 2026 Ballot Measure Tsunami #shorts
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed

1 Replies · 14 views

Load Replies (1) Reply Legacy View

telstar_1

Today at 4:36 PM

But thing is, a lot of these projects are still moving forward. If they hit snags in TX, Loozianna has open arms

Scott Greczkowski

Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge

Last reply Today at 3:18 PM · posted in The Chit Chat Club

Song Name Game Part 3!

Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne

Get it?

An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....

68791 Replies · 2688771 views

Load Replies (68791) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: c-spand

harshness

Today at 10:44 AM

Stay (Just a Little Bit Longer) - Maurice Williams and the Zodiacs

Reactions: long_time_Dish, Bobby and FTA4PA

Bobby

Today at 10:55 AM

Give A Little Bit - Supertramp

Reactions: long_time_Dish and gms49ers

sdfntx

Today at 11:47 AM

Little Bit O' Soul - Music Explosion

gms49ers

Today at 1:02 PM

Soul Man - The Blues Brothers

Reactions: long_time_Dish and FTA4PA

long_time_Dish

Today at 3:18 PM

Heart Full Of Soul - Rush

View all replies (68791)

KAB

Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

Last reply Today at 3:16 PM · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Green Dot on WJ4?

Wireless Joey 4. Yesterday, I noticed a little green dot on a small black field in the upper right hand corner of the screen, regardless of channel, recordings, etc. A restart got rid of it, but I am curious as to what It meant and what I did to get it there.

4 Replies · 111 views

Load Replies (4) Reply Legacy View

Redneck_Randy

Today at 8:34 AM

Google Search

The little green dot inside a small black field in the upper right-hand corner of your screen is an Android privacy indicator confirming that the voice remote's microphone is actively listening. Because the Joey 4 runs on an Android

Reactions: charlesrshell

bnewt

Today at 9:16 AM

That's no good

Reactions: KAB and charlesrshell

Almighty1

Today at 3:05 PM

The green dot on Android TV is supposed to show as long as an app or background service is actively using the microphone or camera. [1, 2]

What Normal Behavior Looks Like

- When active: It appears (often with a small microphone or camera icon that fades into a simple green dot) the moment a voice search, assistant command, or streaming app requests audio input.
- When it disappears: It should vanish a few seconds after you finish your command or after the app stops using the microphone. [1]

Why It Might Stay On (Persistent Dot)
If the green dot stays on indefinitely or won't go away, it usually means:

- An app (such as a voice search tool, media player, or background utility) has a hung process or is keeping the microphone channel open.
- A remote control or voice-recognition service is stuck. [1]

How to Fix or Check It

- Restart your TV: Unplug the power cable for about 30 seconds and plug it back in to clear out stuck background apps.
- Check app permissions: Go to your TV's Settings > Privacy or Device Preferences > Microphone to see which apps have access, and revoke permission for any suspicious or unnecessary apps. [1, 2]

Reactions: charlesrshell

Scott Greczkowski

Today at 3:16 PM

Its a bug. I had it happen to mine. The mic is not listening, and if your worried about that remove the batteries from your remote as thats where the mic is.

Reactions: charlesrshell

Top

Back