Social Feed

D
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
My 722K has been working well from day 1. However, just today, whenever I attempt to enter the My Recordings (either by pressing DVR button twice or using the menus), the unit freezes, then reboots. I have done all the soft re-boot, hard-reboot, and even set the Updates to run, and I can't see any indication on the Diagnostics screen regarding this problem.

Has this occured to others. I am aware of Dish boxes re-booting constantly as a problem (I've seen it myself), but I am asking if anyone has had the experience of the unit working well in all respects EXCEPT when attempting to enter or access the My Recordings.

Thanks in advance. I hope I don't have to RMA it.
12 Replies · 6380 views
D
Update: Well, the day after my last post, the DVR has the very same problem: Whenever I attempt to access My Recordings, the box freezes and reboots.

So, this time I archive almost the remaining 10 hours of programming. Then the DVR behaves properly allowing me to access My Recordings. I then erase a few remaining shows from the internal HDD so that I can start from a clean HDD. Well the 722K does record as scheduled, but still won't let me access My Recordings. So the archived to external HDD is not a fix, at least for me.

I am going to try the secret full reboot/reset, and if that doesn't work, I guess I'll have to RMA it. I'll let you know how things proceed.
primestar31
Update: Well, the day after my last post, the DVR has the very same problem: Whenever I attempt to access My Recordings, the box freezes and reboots.

So, this time I archive almost the remaining 10 hours of programming. Then the DVR behaves properly allowing me to access My Recordings. I then erase a few remaining shows from the internal HDD so that I can start from a clean HDD. Well the 722K does record as scheduled, but still won't let me access My Recordings. So the archived to external HDD is not a fix, at least for me.

I am going to try the secret full reboot/reset, and if that doesn't work, I guess I'll have to RMA it. I'll let you know how things proceed.

Try this instead, it'll do a full reset/reboot as part of it:

1st: Hit this button sequence on your remote:

Menu-6-3-Info-Right-Left-TV/Video to clear the NVRAM, then reboot it.

2nd: After it reboots and comes back up, just do a:

Menu-6-3-Info-Right-Left- Play,- Play,- Recall to format the internal HDD. It'll prompt to format, and reboot again.

You will lose all recordings, and your settings (and timers, write them down first) but it may fix your drive! If this doesn't do it, then it's time to RMA it.
D
Try this instead, it'll do a full reset/reboot as part of it:

1st: Hit this button sequence on your remote:

Menu-6-3-Info-Right-Left-TV/Video to clear the NVRAM, then reboot it.

2nd: After it reboots and comes back up, just do a:

Menu-6-3-Info-Right-Left- Play,- Play,- Recall to format the internal HDD. It'll prompt to format, and reboot again.

You will lose all recordings, and your settings (and timers, write them down first) but it may fix your drive! If this doesn't do it, then it's time to RMA it.

Thanks, I shall try. I've been really busy and haven't had a chance to get on the computer for days. I'll let all know what happens from here.
D
First, Primestar31, thanks for posting the reset/reboot. You saved me from having to hunt it down on the forum.

Second, The memory dump and reformat WORKED! During the procedure a pop-up appeared stating that part of the data on the HDD had been "corrupted." I have confirmed numerous times over the last 2 days that the 722K is working perfectly. I can enter My Recordings with absolutely no issues, and all else works as it should. I have saved the procedure to a file for my future reference. I am quite relieved as it sure beats having to RMA it.

Thanks again, and I do hope this thread is of help to others.
primestar31
First, Primestar31, thanks for posting the reset/reboot. You saved me from having to hunt it down on the forum.

Second, The memory dump and reformat WORKED! During the procedure a pop-up appeared stating that part of the data on the HDD had been "corrupted." I have confirmed numerous times over the last 2 days that the 722K is working perfectly. I can enter My Recordings with absolutely no issues, and all else works as it should. I have saved the procedure to a file for my future reference. I am quite relieved as it sure beats having to RMA it.

Thanks again, and I do hope this thread is of help to others.

I was glad to help. Since you did the memory dump, you will probably also have to re-do all your personal settings through the menu's. I know it dumped all those for me on my Vip622 receiver, and I had to re-do them.
D
I was glad to help. Since you did the memory dump, you will probably also have to re-do all your personal settings through the menu's. I know it dumped all those for me on my Vip622 receiver, and I had to re-do them.

Well, I had backuped all my settings to my remote, before the bad behavior, I believe. I regularly back up with a Full System Backup. However, after the dump and reformat, I entered the Wizard and it stated the remotes were properly paired but no option to RESTORE my settings. I have researched on the forum to no avail. I'll just re-do the stuff manually, but I am disappointed that I could not restore my settings as this is the point of the 722K/222K backup settings feature. There could be a reason why the restore option was not provided. It may be working properly in a way I am unaware of.

Thanks again. Just really happy I have a good working 722k back without RMAing. I archived all the programming, so nothing lost. Thanks.
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68634 Replies · 2679085 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
gms49ers
Dancing Days - Led Zeppelin
dishstaller
Dancing in the Street - Van Halen
long_time_Dish
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
  • Like
Reactions: gms49ers
Bobby
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
Let me fix that for you:
Baker Street - Gerry Rafferty
EatMyVolts
The 59th Street Bridge Song -- Simon & Garfunkel
M
Last reply · posted in Over the Air Television By RabbitEars.Info
Interesting article about the work being done to develope an ATSC 3 converter box. Yes it does mention affordable.
10 Replies · 543 views
primestar31
DEATH TO NEXGEN!
star trek GIF


It's dead, they just don't know it yet. They killed it by forcing DRM on it, and that TOTALLY botched implementing it.

There is absolutely NO compelling reason for anybody to switch to ATSC3.0. They only want it as a total and complete money grab.
navychop
I truly hope you are right.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
Mister B
What bothers me is the total waste of broadcasting spectrum in this very crowded market. It has been almost three years now since KFOX converted their broadcast tower to ATSC 3.0 and moved all of their channels to other towers causing noticeable degradation of the picture quality.
I have a Sony TV with 3.0 capabilities but still use the 1.0 version of locals due to the fact that one or all of the 3.0 channels are often missing or unwatchable. In this city of 800K I doubt that more than a few hundred even know about ATSC 3.0.
The only thing that could motivate me to be interested in 3.0 would be if all of the minor networks (diginets) could be in at least 720P rather than blurry ultra-compressed 480i.
Three years is long enough to waste one of the few available RF frequencies in the area for this trial.
It is time to either move on with this experiment or call it quits.
navychop
In this city of 800K I doubt that more than a few hundred even know about ATSC 3.0.

They might notice the hand going into their pocket for their wallet.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
navychop
It is time to either move on with this experiment or call it quits.

QFT. Of course, my preference involves a curb and some kicking.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
S
star trek GIF


It's dead, they just don't know it yet. They killed it by forcing DRM on it, and that TOTALLY botched implementing it.

There is absolutely NO compelling reason for anybody to switch to ATSC3.0. They only want it as a total and complete money grab.
WHAT ABOUT THE INTERNET PART OF IT. NO ONE WANTS A BOX CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET EITHER.
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Local Radio Discussion
21 Replies · 600 views
dishdude
It's probably been 2 decades since I've listened to an AM radio station. Very rarely listen to FM any more.
  • Like
Reactions: reubenray and Jimbo
Jimbo
I am 1 that wants the AM to Stay ....
That said, since '08 I have had Sat radio available to me ... I think I have turned on AM 3 or 4 times, just to see if its still there.

Fwiw, if theres a Major disaster or bad weather or whatever, the chances of me finding out about it by going to the AM side of the radio is SLIM and None.
Even FM, I haven't really had on since '13ish, I may turn it on from time to time, just to see if its still there.
harshness
Fwiw, if theres a Major disaster or bad weather or whatever, the chances of me finding out about it by going to the AM side of the radio is SLIM and None.
Automation has seen to that. You can't get evening drive traffic reports where I live, much less disaster reports.
dishstaller
Very rarely listen to FM any more
That goes for a lot of people. I've been advertising on radio for more than a decade now and am very familiar with this subject. While it is still a valuable tool, it has far less impact than it did just a few years ago. The best reaction I get is from a local Country music station....they play a mix of older and newer music and have a very big footprint.
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony
Jimbo
That goes for a lot of people. I've been advertising on radio for more than a decade now and am very familiar with this subject. While it is still a valuable tool, it has far less impact than it did just a few years ago. The best reaction I get is from a local Country music station....they play a mix of older and newer music and have a very big footprint.
Do you do any Ad's on Satellite ?

If Not, why not, because it's not Local ?
dishstaller
Do you do any Ad's on Satellite ?

If Not, why not, because it's not Local ?
No, just regular FM stations. One is the country station I mentioned and the other is a Talk Radio station which used to get fantastic results but honestly, since the death of Rush Limbaugh, talk radio just doesn't do as well. There were two guys who had an early morning show which was hugely popular here in the southeast but one of them retired a couple years ago and the show just doesn't garner the same numbers as it used to.
S
Haven't listened AM or FM in years
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 8 views
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
1 Replies · 12 views
Bobby
Rest in peace.
JSheridan
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I know HipKat said that they were working on conversions but we got the official news yesterday right from Dish that starting next month all DMA's will be on the western arc, and all customers will be assigned to that. That's gonna mean a lot of customers around here aren't gonna get Dish unless there are exceptions. Too many mountains and trees.
173 Replies · 4937 views
S
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Jimbo
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Mister B
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
S
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
can't forget the little blue m&m's
charlesrshell
can't forget the little blue m&m's
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
T
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Foxbat
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
Because he didn't have a fleet of reusable rockets. Starlink works because SpaceX is able to launch hundreds (thousands?) of their Starlink satellites for what a single geostationary Internet satellite costs to build and launch on a disposable launcher.
T
But how is it reusable if it's disposable
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
My gf is 29 years younger than me :shh
Almighty1
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
He does not have the resources aka $$$ compared to Elon Musk as in reality, Elon can eat Charlie for lunch or even mop the floor with Charlie if he wanted to.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
ment to 20 yrs dam phone
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Marques Brownlee
· posted in Marques Brownlee
0 Replies · 5 views
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Movie Talk
53 Replies · 10078 views
long_time_Dish
Also watched part 2 about a week or so ago after rewatching part 1. It's not as faithful to the book as I was hoping for. Part 1 stayed fairly faithful to the novel, but part 2 took some liberties that I felt were rather excessively non-novel. It looks like a prequel series will happen before part 3. My issue is: there's no prequel that was written as a novel, so what will it be pulled from? Or will it just be "based loosely" on the novel?
K
Also watched part 2 about a week or so ago after rewatching part 1. It's not as faithful to the book as I was hoping for. Part 1 stayed fairly faithful to the novel, but part 2 took some liberties that I felt were rather excessively non-novel. It looks like a prequel series will happen before part 3. My issue is: there's no prequel that was written as a novel, so what will it be pulled from? Or will it just be "based loosely" on the novel?
There is a bunch of other Dune written by Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert (Franks son). I think the series in production is taken from one of their books about the Bene Gesserit.
long_time_Dish
There is a bunch of other Dune written by Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert (Franks son). I think the series in production is taken from one of their books about the Bene Gesserit.
Correct. I've read all of them (yes, it took awhile, better part of a year, in my spare time). And they can't really consider or classify a series about the Bene Gesserit as a prequel. Sure, I suppose they can call it that, if they want to, because it begins before the time of Paul Atredies, but it's still a stretch. It's a Dune-related novel, not a prequel as we generally think of prequels...
long_time_Dish
Well, it looks good! I just hope they stayed close to the trilogy, but it doesn't look like it.
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 10 views