Social Feed

Main Feed My Feed
loubon
loubon
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Broadband Questions

I am thinking of adding the broadband option and although I've searched other threads I can't quite get all my answers straight in my head so I thought I'd just ask them here in one thread.

First, my equipment - 2 622's and a Linksys Wireless-G 2.4 Ghz with Speed Booster WRT54GS in a different room than where the two 622s are.

My questions and assumptions I need to validate are first about Home Plug vs. WiFi and then some general performance questions.

I'm leaning towards the HomePlug since my understanding is I would only need one for $30 vs. two WiFis at $25 each. Is that correct?

How is the performance through the HomePlug when the receivers are in different parts of the house? I know that when I use my laptop via Wifi in the same room as one of the 622s (the furthest one) I get constant buffering with streaming content. I would think that HomePlug emulates a wired network and this wouldn't happen. Does this happen with the Home Plug (or even the WiFi for the 622 for that matter)?

And finally do both options work with my router? I saw a lot mentioned about Netgear but not as much about Linksys. Also, does it need to be a dual band (?) to be able to handle streaming content (not sure if that is the right terminology).

Thanks in advance as I know I always get great advice here and have learned a lot from all of you just reading here on a regular basis (although I like the video option on the channel guide). ;)
Read more
6 Replies · 1558 views
Load Replies (6) Reply Legacy View
TG2
TG2
Do you have need for more than just 1 network connection by either of your receivers?

If you did.. then I'd recommend getting a Buffalo 300N router ... wipe out its OS (firmware) and load DD-WRT onto it. DD-WRT has configs for making the 5 ports on its back side, used as a wireless bridge / access point.

at the far side of my house.. I have one 722k, a bluray player, my Onkyo internet enabled AV receiver, a Wii & an Xbox, and a non-wireless pc. Rather than getting wireless dongles for each device.. I plugged them into an 8 port switch... then connected to one of the Buffalo routers.. that does the wireless bridge to the rest of my network... high speed N ... leaving 54G open for the laptops.

In my case.. I actually bought *two* of the buffalo's (newegg.com $40 bucks each) and created a completely separate network just for all the wireless non-pc stuff.. both my 722's come to it, as well as my 211k, the upstairs wii..(yes even though wireless is built in) and that way there's no contention for *wireless* bandwidth in the house..
Read more
Reply
loubon
loubon
Can anyone else offer any advice?
Read more
Reply
pabeader
pabeader
for you i would do homeplug with a slinglink adapter. as long as there are no power strips or ups you will do fine.
Read more
Reply
whatchel1
whatchel1
TG2 said:
Do you have need for more than just 1 network connection by either of your receivers?

If you did.. then I'd recommend getting a Buffalo 300N router ... wipe out its OS (firmware) and load DD-WRT onto it. DD-WRT has configs for making the 5 ports on its back side, used as a wireless bridge / access point.

at the far side of my house.. I have one 722k, a bluray player, my Onkyo internet enabled AV receiver, a Wii & an Xbox, and a non-wireless pc. Rather than getting wireless dongles for each device.. I plugged them into an 8 port switch... then connected to one of the Buffalo routers.. that does the wireless bridge to the rest of my network... high speed N ... leaving 54G open for the laptops.

In my case.. I actually bought *two* of the buffalo's (newegg.com $40 bucks each) and created a completely separate network just for all the wireless non-pc stuff.. both my 722's come to it, as well as my 211k, the upstairs wii..(yes even though wireless is built in) and that way there's no contention for *wireless* bandwidth in the house..
Click to expand...

You sure like complicated. ;)
Read more
Reply
loubon
loubon
Can anyone help with my performance questions?
Read more
Reply
3HaloODST
3HaloODST
whatchel1 said:
You sure like complicated. ;)
Click to expand...

Me too :) . I love messing with DD-WRT.
Read more
Reply
Scott Greczkowski
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club

Song Name Game Part 3!

Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
Read more
68652 Replies · 2680086 views
Load Replies (68652) Reply Legacy View
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
gms49ers
gms49ers
Sweet Miracle - Rush
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller and long_time_Dish
long_time_Dish
long_time_Dish
Sweet Baby James - James Taylor
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
ClarkGable
ClarkGable
Sweet City Woman - The Stampeders
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
gms49ers
gms49ers
Jet City Woman - Queensryche
Read more
Reply
FTA4PA
FTA4PA
Detroit Rock City - Kiss
Read more
Reply
View all replies (68652)
R
reubenray
· posted in Computers and Gadgets

Laptop Shutting Off When On Battery?

Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
Read more
0 Replies · 10 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
Marques Brownlee
· posted in Marques Brownlee

Macbook PROLED XDR Impressions: They Said They Wouldn't!

Time for another AWESOME video from Marques Brownlee!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2reQut8WNGc


Direct YouTube Link - Macbook PROLED XDR Impressions: They Said They Wouldn't!
The official MKBHD Website!
The MKBHD Store
Read more
0 Replies · 18 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
iJustine
· posted in iJustine

MacBoo PROLED - What You Need To Know!

Time for another AWESOME video from iJustine!


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Duq4hKmUE4c


Direct YouTube Link - MacBoo PROLED - What You Need To Know!
The official iJustine Website's Website
Buy her book!
Read more
0 Replies · 20 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
iJustine
· posted in iJustine

MacBook PROLED Nanotexture

Time for another AWESOME video from iJustine!


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sgr5V8j7c5w


Direct YouTube Link - MacBook PROLED Nanotexture
The official iJustine Website's Website
Buy her book!
Read more
0 Replies · 3 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Microsoft's New Round of Employee Buyouts

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbfGWonQfys


Direct YouTube Link - Microsoft's New Round of Employee Buyouts
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed
Read more
0 Replies · 17 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
Linus Tech Tips
· posted in Linus Tech Tips

Linus was Right - Apple (probably)

Time for another AWESOME video from Linus Tech Tips!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JOW7TTOGfI


Direct YouTube Link - Linus was Right - Apple (probably)
Linus on Facebook
The LTT Store
Read more
0 Replies · 14 views
Replies Reply Legacy View
dishstaller
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club

I think we could all use a laugh - Rodney Dangerfield on Carson

Good...simple humor. Enjoy


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJy0WnejlF4
Read more
1 Replies · 37 views
Load Replies (1) Reply Legacy View
Jimbo
Bruce
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

How things have changed

I was reading this article

thehill.com

Cable TV ‘cord-cutters’ became the majority in 2022

The steady decline of cable and broadcast television, and the rise of streaming services, reached a sort of inflection point over the past year. Last summer, for the first time, streaming ser…
thehill.com thehill.com

That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.

Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.
Read more
897 Replies · 72101 views
Load Replies (897) Reply Legacy View
  • Wow
Reactions: MikeD-C05
Bruce
Bruce
And again, 15 months in a row, streaming wins-

Cable and Broadcast added together-36.4%

Streaming with a massive 49.6%, 13.2% higher than Broadcast/Streaming.

IMG_2172.webp
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05 and Howard Simmons
Jimbo
Jimbo
Bruce said:
And again, 15 months in a row, streaming wins-

Cable and Broadcast added together-36.4%

Streaming with a massive 49.6%, 13.2% higher than Broadcast/Streaming.

View attachment 194983
Click to expand...
Your Still Thrilled about all this ?

These numbers will Never be accurate as many people use Both still ...

You have services like Hulu Live and You Tube TV that do, what you call Cable, but they ARE Streaming, so Which is is ?

Does it get counted 2x as both Streaming and Cable ?
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
Jimbo
Jimbo
But they ARE Streaming as well, so they Should be counted as both, which would make the Streaming numbers even More prominate.

Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...
Read more
Reply
Bruce
Bruce
Jimbo said:
But they ARE Streaming as well, so they Should be counted as both, which would make the Streaming numbers even More prominate.

Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...
Click to expand...
Same.

Ratings for streaming content is extremely accurate, since the service knows who is watching what and when, when we hit ok on our remotes.

Ratings for Broadcast/Cable shows has always been a estimate.
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
Jimbo
Bruce said:
Same.

Ratings for streaming content is extremely accurate, since the service knows who is watching what and when, when we hit ok on our remotes.

Ratings for Broadcast/Cable shows has always been a estimate.
Click to expand...
If I flip thru shows on an app, 3-4 in a few minutes, does that still show that I watched the whole episode ?


If I watch the Super Bowl for 5 minutes, does that count as watching the Super Bowl ?
Is it the same if I just watched the Commercials.
Read more
Reply
Bruce
Bruce
Jimbo said:
If I flip thru shows on an app, 3-4 in a few minutes, does that still show that I watched the whole episode ?


If I watch the Super Bowl for 5 minutes, does that count as watching the Super Bowl ?
Is it the same if I just watched the Commercials.
Click to expand...
Nielsen Streaming Ratings: Third-party measurement firm Nielsen tracks U.S. streaming viewership, releasing weekly reports that measure total minutes viewed across major television sets, broken down by program (such as original, acquired, and movie content) rather than minute-by-minute audience retention curves.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: llokey and Jimbo
S
savarese04
Jimbo said:
Your Still Thrilled about all this ?

These numbers will Never be accurate as many people use Both still ...
Click to expand...
Nobody is "happy" or "sad" about this. Simply posting data in an non-editorialized way has nothing to do with anyone's feelings.

The data on the streaming side is immensely accurate, I'm guessing to the millisecond. Plus most people likely have not turned off data sharing and thus they are grabbing a huge swath of data. Much more accurate than cable which relies on a smaller sample size and probably not to the second.

In either case, nobody is getting "double counted" because it's usage based. If I watch 100 minutes of content and 30 minutes is on Youtube and 20 minutes on Disney and 50 minutes on YTTV, it's going to show up as 30%, 20%, 50% slices of my personal pie respectively.
Jimbo said:
Q.
Who does the Counting for Streaming ?

Neilson does the Broadcast/Cable ...
Click to expand...
Nielsen does. If you go into the settings of any of your streaming accounts, you can turn off the option to share to usage data with their third party measuring service - Nielsen.
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
Jimbo
savarese04 said:
Nobody is "happy" or "sad" about this. Simply posting data in an non-editorialized way has nothing to do with anyone's feelings.

The data on the streaming side is immensely accurate, I'm guessing to the millisecond. Plus most people likely have not turned off data sharing and thus they are grabbing a huge swath of data. Much more accurate than cable which relies on a smaller sample size and probably not to the second.

In either case, nobody is getting "double counted" because it's usage based. If I watch 100 minutes of content and 30 minutes is on Youtube and 20 minutes on Disney and 50 minutes on YTTV, it's going to show up as 30%, 20%, 50% slices of my personal pie respectively.

Nielsen does. If you go into the settings of any of your streaming accounts, you can turn off the option to share to usage data with their third party measuring service - Nielsen.
Click to expand...
I have turned some off, not others ...
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
dishstaller
dishstaller
Jimbo said:

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/u4rACh-Tt5k?feature=share
Click to expand...

Funny thing is that as the screen size and pic quality increase, the quality of the programming has DEcreased.
Read more
Reply
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
View all replies (897)
Ramy
Ramy
Supporting Founder
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section

2026-27 NCAA College Football

Really excited for this season with Kentucky having a new coach and some really exciting recruits. Probably won't last long, but here's hoping this season is great.
Read more
174 Replies · 2677 views
Load Replies (174) Reply Legacy View
  • Haha
Reactions: Mike0616
Y
Yespage
You mean other than Miami being in the final last year... and Indiana being the only bye team to win a game?
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
Jimbo
Yespage said:
You mean other than Miami being in the final last year... and Indiana being the only bye team to win a game?
Click to expand...
No, I was actually referring to outside of the Top 8, but should have been Top 12 ...

I guess I should have looked at the bracket from last year first ...

I'm more thinking about them trying to expect a 15 to beat a 5 seed or there abouts .
Read more
Reply
Ronnie-
Ronnie-
Jimbo said:
I'm more thinking about them trying to expect a 15 to beat a 5 seed or there abouts .
Click to expand...
I mean you get upsets all the time.

Just a couple of weeks ago. Unranked Florida knocked off number 7 texas. Unranked Auburn beat number 1 Georgia.

This week unranked Cincinnati beat number 8 texas Tech. Unranked UCF beat number 2 BYU.

No reason to think similar upsets wont happen in the playoffs where a low seed can upset a higher one.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat, osu1991 and AZ.
AZ.
AZ.
Ronnie- said:
I mean you get upsets all the time.

Just a couple of weeks ago. Unranked Florida knocked off number 7 texas. Unranked Auburn beat number 1 Georgia.

This week unranked Cincinnati beat number 8 texas Tech. Unranked UCF beat number 2 BYU.

No reason to think similar upsets wont happen in the playoffs where a low seed can upset a higher one.
Click to expand...
Yep, wonder why we rank the top 25 in 2 poles still? Do the ranking change much if they are unranked or have many loses? They sure do, any given day never take your opponent as a cake walk.....
Read more
Reply
Jimbo
Jimbo
Ronnie- said:
I mean you get upsets all the time.

Just a couple of weeks ago. Unranked Florida knocked off number 7 texas. Unranked Auburn beat number 1 Georgia.

This week unranked Cincinnati beat number 8 texas Tech. Unranked UCF beat number 2 BYU.

No reason to think similar upsets wont happen in the playoffs where a low seed can upset a higher one.
Click to expand...
Correct, you Do get upsets from time to time ....however .
You Don't get teams UPSETTING teams for 5 weeks in a row.

They are trying to make this Basketball and its a far cry from the way that is played.

How long till they go to 32 teams ? Then they will say, well, the NFL is 32 teams, we can make more money that way .... except the NFL is 32 teams, that are a set number of teams and divisions, you don't have that in College ... oh but they will try.

They would have to choose what teams they would want in and thats it.
Hopefully that NEVER happens.

I can see the NCAA going away and the CFP taking that portion over and a Collective Bargaining agreement coming in the not to distant future.
Read more
Reply
  • Haha
Reactions: meStevo
rvvaquero
rvvaquero
The problem with rankings and playoffs is that they are designed to hype the game and make money. Period.

The only reason that BYU and Texas Tech were upsets is that they were hyped up in the standings in the first place. I love watching BYU and Bear Bachmeier. They are a fun and talented team, but not nearly so strong, fast, big, and skilled as a true top ten team. Does anyone truly believe they could compete with the likes of Georgia, Ohio State, Indiana, Alabama, etc.? Yet, they were ranked above those teams.

Each year, there are 10 to 12 teams who truly could compete for the championship if it depended on winning more than one game in a playoff. Including teams like James Madison, Tulane, BYU, etc. in a playoff has nothing to do with determining a national champion. It's just about money.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: Yespage and AZ.
Ronnie-
Ronnie-
Jimbo said:
Correct, you Do get upsets from time to time
Click to expand...
Yes. As shown in a few posts now.


Jimbo said:
You Don't get teams UPSETTING teams for 5 weeks in a row.

.
Click to expand...
But that wasn't what your stated argument was though.


I mean if you drag it out, no team even a favorite is gonna win every game 20 weeks in a row.


With the parity in college football now, who knows who can beat anyone at any given time?

This season and last have shown it might not be the ones we think that might win it all that will win it all.
Read more
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: osu1991
Jimbo
Jimbo
Ronnie- said:
Yes. As shown in a few posts now.



But that wasn't what your stated argument was though.


I mean if you drag it out, no team even a favorite is gonna win every game 20 weeks in a row.


With the parity in college football now, who knows who can beat anyone at any given time?

This season and last have shown it might not be the ones we think that might win it all that will win it all.
Click to expand...
No, no ... if you want to make the playoffs, you want to Win it ... If you want to Win it, you need to Win 4-5 games in a row against Top 10 teams for the most part, theres a Possibility you'd play someone out side of the Top 10, but not much.

The Playoffs is a 4-5 game Win or Go Home.
Read more
Reply
View all replies (174)
Load More
Top
Back