Social Feed

whiteyanderson
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
One of the features, I mean maybe THE ONE feature I liked about the DirecTV DVRs was that when the boxes were off, they were keeping a buffer of I think it was the last 2 hours on whatever channel you were tuned to when you powered the box off. I thought it was pretty cool, as sometimes, like tonight, when I'm up working late I could go turn the TV on and if it was something interesting, I could rewind back to the beginning. As long as the beginning was within that 2 hour buffer of course.

Is this an option with the Hopper and Joey? Seems like I remember someone saying there was a trick to doing it, but I can't find the thread. I tried it out last night and I could get it to rewind past the point the show was at when I turned the Joey on, but it was in like frame by frame mode. Obviously that would take forever.

Just wondering if it was possible. Thanks in advance.
17 Replies · 6066 views
A
Dish implements their buffering differently than both Tivo and Dtv in software, which I've been told doesn't allow for buffering while the box is in standby. I wish it worked all the time too.
dare2be
Dish implements their buffering differently than both Tivo and Dtv in software, which I've been told doesn't allow for buffering while the box is in standby. I wish it worked all the time too.
Except it does buffer in standby after a timer has completed while in standby.
3HaloODST
I wouldn't think that it would be that hard for Dish to implement standby buffering. However with the ability to set recordings from any Internet-connected PC or phone, I'm not quite sure how useful it would be (for me, anyway.)
DustoMan
I think it would be cool if they at least buffered in standby for at least a couple minutes. It would be nice to be able to pause - shut everything down - go to the next room - power up and resume the last channel you were watching via the red button. The way it works now I have to pause something - go to the next room - resume then pause immediately - go back to the first room to shut everything down - go back. Passing video from one room to the next should be more elegant.
Hall
I wouldn't think that it would be that hard for Dish to implement standby buffering.
There's nothing to implement. It's a matter of uncommenting the lines of code already there. Their DVRs used to this. I distinctly recall the manual for the 522 stating that it is *always* recording and it was. There was always a 1+ hour buffer available.




Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
3HaloODST
There's nothing to implement. It's a matter of uncommenting the lines of code already there. Their DVRs used to this. I distinctly recall the manual for the 522 stating that it is *always* recording and it was. There was always a 1+ hour buffer available.




Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

Implement = put. "I wouldn't think that it would be that hard for Dish to put in standby buffering." Arguing semantics to sound smart? lol

That being said, I'm not sure how well the standby buffering would work with Hopper, unless when recordings are scheduled or whatever the buffer is automatically released. So that would make the buffer not necessarily reliable. I dunno, I guess the DirecTV customers got used to it, but personally I don't really see the point in a standby buffer. If you don't want to miss something that was on, record it, or leave the receiver on and disable the inactivity timer.
A
Except it does buffer in standby after a timer has completed while in standby.

If a timer fires, the box isn't entirely in standby - there's a routine being executed that tells the IRD to buffer/record the stream, with some padding on each side before the box goes back to full standby. Tivo and Dtv originally used a hardware buffering scheme which were each proprietary. I don't know that that's still the case (I believe Dtv is now a software buffer), but because of the legacy buffering scheme (their customers expecting the box to act that way), they've both kept their buffers going 24/7. They also do their FSCK and cleanup behind the scenes, where as Dish boxes power down to do their maintenance. Dish's hardware used a software solution to buffer, supposedly to avoid legal/patent issues. The software buffer could work 24/7, as it did on a few older boxes, but after the Tivo litigation, I wouldn't expect 24/7 buffer to happen, although could be surprised at some point in the future.
D
This goes back to the 50X days when the HDD's did not spin down. Dish had high HDD failure rates (for them anyway) and good ol' Dave Kummer had explained that the 50X (the only DVR's available in those days) would spin down shortly after being put in standby to increase life of the HDD.

From the 721 and subsequent DVR's, the HDD was/is always spinning, and never to spin down along with not recording to buffer unless it was a timer recording. I think this is just a case of legacy "thinking" or "that's how the HDD/buffer has been handled for about a decade; there is no reason to change the software or manner of buffer in standby when there seem to be far more important features customers demand," sort of thinking. While the HDD is surely spinning, one could argue that the slider and arms involved in writing to the HDD are given a good rest from constantly, never ceasing to write as this is what can shorten the life of an HDD, especially writing from two + tuners 24/7, this has a hand in decreasing HDD life even further. In past Tech Forum some years ago, Mark Jackson confirmed they had a prototype multiple tuner DVR (more than 2), and they were experiencing very high failure rate of the HDD's. However, today, HDD's seem bee able to survive being beat up by 3 live HD streams, 1 download occuring, and multiple playback of content to different clients, and DirecTV's 5 tuner DVR seems to say something for today HDD's. But I would be willing to say that the 5 tuner DVR's HDD is NOT going to last as long as some would expect compared to a 2 tuner DVR.

Yes, TiVo constantly buffers and spins, but this would also seem to allow for the most reliable experience for TiVo's multi-room viewing (S2 & S3) and streaming (S4) features: always fully alive and active arms and writers when accessing that DVR from another room.

Bottom line, there may be technical reasons to always buffer (making it EASIER or MORE RELIABLE for specific feature) or a consequence or just plain a preference, for whatever reason. Of course, during any recording, Dish DVR's also record the other tuner to the buffer.

On occasion, it was nice that my TiVo had been buffering (only a 30 minute buffer on TiVo), but most often it either wasn't enough of a buffer to catch the entire program or it was tuned to a channel I didn't want buffered. So, it really isn't such "feature" after all. It couldn't automatically re-tune to the channels I would always like buffered. That would be a record timer, the same solution for a Dish DVR, and TiVo does not tout the constant buffering as anything at all. We TiVo owners would take an hour on the buffer, even if it stopped buffering in standby. IMHO, this buffering in standby is a "whatever" function that, one would think, is nowhere near a make or break function. I would think that Manual Timers, DishPass, OTA recording and guide info support, saving our preferences and timers in the cloud, much better interface and browsing for on-line content (it is a DISASTER now), and even a 4th tuner on the Hopper would be real features that would enhance the Hopper/Joey system more than any buffering in standby. Buffering in standby would be fine after perfecting things. Of course, a buffer in standby software update would surely mess-up some other higher and more important feature as a consequence of Dish's software updates :).
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in What's Cooking?
We have a Breakfast and Dinner thread so... :)
Continuing from the Breakfast thread, found Cornbread mix so ...
Yellow Cornbread Mix
2 Hatch Green Chiles -diced
1 Egg
2/3 cup of milk
add to greased pan
Bake for 400f 20-25 minutes(From instructions)
now to put together and try... this to go with pinto beans...
5448 Replies · 336080 views
M
Garlic cheese bread
Green beans
Apples
Chocolate Milk
Some weird noodles. ;)
(They have salad and a couple other fruits if wanted)
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
TRG
TRG
Club sandwich and corn chowder. Iced tea.
dfergie
Chili dog bowl, water… (homemade chili)
TRG
TRG
Leftover wanton soup and pork fried rice. Water.
dfergie
IMG_5955.webp

Sweet tea…
  • Like
Reactions: TRG
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68658 Replies · 2680220 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
I Wanna Talk About Me - Toby Keith
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
gms49ers
It's Easy - Boston
RaiderPower
Take It Easy On Me - Little River Band
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 46 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 285 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
2 Replies · 51 views
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

2 Replies · 55 views
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Jimbo
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

They will have to look at the switching sections to determine WHY 2 trains were on the same track ... at the same time.
dishstaller
Thought this article might be of interest to some of you who might travel via train.