Social Feed

C
Last reply · posted in Over the Air Television By RabbitEars.Info
Hi Guys,

I realize this question has been asked a million times, but here goes:

My OTA antenna is mounted on a 5' mast, on a tripod at the peak of my roof.
(My roof is 30' from the ground)

I have a 3 year old 2 storey home with a very steep roof pitch.

I chose to run the coax cable neatly under the shingle cap (at the ridge of the roof).
The cable goes into the attic and down a conduit (central vac pipe) that the builder installed.
This conduit goes from the attic directly through both levels of my house then to the basement where the panel is located.

I did not want to run the cable down the hip and then beside the downspout or down the brick for many reasons mainly for appearance.

If I run the ground cable along the top of the roof to the closest point where I can bring it down, the ground cable length will be 40 to 50 feet long.

I was thinking of running the ground wire to the panel where the main ground block is located or from the panel back outside the house to a ground rod.

If I run the ground wire down the conduit (in the same path as the coax) the ground wire will be 80 - 90 feet long. Is this acceptable or should I just forget about grounding it?

I can post pictures of installation if requested.

Any suggestions?
10 Replies · 3656 views
FaT Air
The minimum that I would do is a 4 turn loop in the coax as soon as it enters the attic. Then a coax ground block at the service panel. Ground block tied into the electrical ground there. Then another 4 turn loop of coax as the coax leaves the ground block to the connected TVs and/or DVR, Make the loops about 4 to 6 inches across. The static charge from winds across the antenna will discharge through the coax shield to the ground block, to the electrical ground.
Trees taller than the antenna height sometimes provides a 'cone of protection' so if they are close enough that may minimize the chances of a strike. YMMV.
To really ground the mast and antenna I'd find the most direct path between it and the ground used by the electrical on the exterior of the home (sorry, but that's the 'universal 'code' AFAIK.
I would NOT run the ground wire through the house. The purpose is to keep a strike outside.
Make corners 'gentle' in the ground wire. No sharp 90 degree corners.
C
The minimum that I would do is a 4 turn loop in the coax as soon as it enters the attic. Then a coax ground block at the service panel. Ground block tied into the electrical ground there. Then another 4 turn loop of coax as the coax leaves the ground block to the connected TVs and/or DVR, Make the loops about 4 to 6 inches across. The static charge from winds across the antenna will discharge through the coax shield to the ground block, to the electrical ground.

Thanks for your response. What about grounding to an outlet using a coax ground block?

To really ground the mast and antenna I'd find the most direct path between it and the ground used by the electrical on the exterior of the home (sorry, but that's the 'universal 'code' AFAIK.
I would NOT run the ground wire through the house. The purpose is to keep a strike outside.
Make corners 'gentle' in the ground wire. No sharp 90 degree corners.

I am afraid that is impossible if I want to make it look good.
My roof is very high, and the ridge (horizontal roof peak) is only about 6 feet long.
So in order to get to the perimeter, I would have to run the wire directly over top of the shingles for about 25- 30 feet.
I guess I have no choice.

I have a roll of 12 guage ground wire. Would this be ok if the length is 50 feet?

Thanks for the advice.
fred555
What about a lightning arrestor in addition to a grounded mast?
I use one of these:
859902_zoom.jpg


http://www.solidsignal.com/pview.asp?p=859902&d=Wilson-Electronics-859902-0-3-GHz-Lightning-Protector-(859902)&sku=813986003237&q=lightning arrestor
FaT Air
Those are "N" connectors. RG8 usually. 50 ohm usually.
Think a normal TV ground block with a loop of coax on the TV side will be just as effective. That worked wonders on the 300 ft towers and their radios I maintained in the ND oil patch back in the 80's,
I do that here with the TV ant. and sat dishes. Haven't lost any equipment to lightning, but a tree within 50 ft of them took a direct hit a few years ago, and is no longer.
fred555
Those are "N" connectors. RG8 usually. 50 ohm usually.
Think a normal TV ground block with a loop of coax on the TV side will be just as effective. That worked wonders on the 300 ft towers and their radios I maintained in the ND oil patch back in the 80's,
I do that here with the TV ant. and sat dishes. Haven't lost any equipment to lightning, but a tree within 50 ft of them took a direct hit a few years ago, and is no longer.

Sorry I posted the wrong one. Good catch. This is the one I installed, I figured .2 db loss what the heck:

http://www.solidsignal.com/pview.as..._term=859992&gclid=CNih5Y_lsswCFRFahgodql0OZw

I did the loop too. I figured an insurance company could not argue a claim when there was a real honest to goodness arresetor in the line. The wife wanted no ambiguities as far as insurance goes.

EDIT: It looks like the arrestor is not really required by code for coax:

Antenna discharge unit

The NEC requires that each lead-in conductor from an outdoor antenna be provided with a
listed antenna discharge unit (ADU) unless the lead-in has a continuous shield that is properly grounded (figure 3) [par. 810.20(A)]. The term lead-in refers to any cable or conductor from the antenna system including coaxial cables, waveguides, rotator control cables, and powering conductors and cables for mast- or tower-mounted amplifiers and other outdoor electronics associated with the antenna system.

Thanks! I guess I will not worry about an expensive arrestor next time.
  • Like
Reactions: FaT Air
FaT Air
Not required, but is an optional 'extra'.
  • Like
Reactions: fred555
harshness
What about grounding to an outlet using a coax ground block?
Understand that a coax ground requires much the same bonding that a mast ground requires and both the mast and the cable are supposed to be grounded independently (10 gauge on mast and 17 gauge on coax). IIRC it used to be 17ga on the mast as that's what the carrier wire on coax was for.

An outlet is NOT a bonding point. The hard part is that all grounding must be done BEFORE cables or wires enter into the structure. Perhaps not obviously, this includes the ground wire itself (the ground wire can't come from inside).

The Mike Holt website has lots of pictures and what most consider to be authoritative interpretations of the NEC. There's also a couple of YouTube videos from Mike Holt that talk about the issues with nomenclature and now the NFPA has tinkered with the NEC. There's also the concept of an Antenna Discharge Unit brought up in one of the videos that is somehow different from a grounding block but is required on the coax itself.



Again, there is a big difference between protection from static electricity and lightning (though lightning may be "attracted" to static electricity).
  • Like
Reactions: fred555
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 5 views
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
1 Replies · 9 views
Bobby
Rest in peace.
JSheridan
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I know HipKat said that they were working on conversions but we got the official news yesterday right from Dish that starting next month all DMA's will be on the western arc, and all customers will be assigned to that. That's gonna mean a lot of customers around here aren't gonna get Dish unless there are exceptions. Too many mountains and trees.
173 Replies · 4933 views
S
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Jimbo
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Mister B
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
S
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
can't forget the little blue m&m's
charlesrshell
can't forget the little blue m&m's
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
T
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Foxbat
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
Because he didn't have a fleet of reusable rockets. Starlink works because SpaceX is able to launch hundreds (thousands?) of their Starlink satellites for what a single geostationary Internet satellite costs to build and launch on a disposable launcher.
T
But how is it reusable if it's disposable
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
My gf is 29 years younger than me :shh
Almighty1
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
He does not have the resources aka $$$ compared to Elon Musk as in reality, Elon can eat Charlie for lunch or even mop the floor with Charlie if he wanted to.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
ment to 20 yrs dam phone
Marques Brownlee
· posted in Marques Brownlee
0 Replies · 4 views
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68633 Replies · 2679055 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
FTA4PA
Strange Days - Nazareth
gms49ers
Dancing Days - Led Zeppelin
dishstaller
Dancing in the Street - Van Halen
long_time_Dish
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
  • Like
Reactions: gms49ers
Bobby
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
Let me fix that for you:
Baker Street - Gerry Rafferty
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Movie Talk
53 Replies · 10077 views
long_time_Dish
Also watched part 2 about a week or so ago after rewatching part 1. It's not as faithful to the book as I was hoping for. Part 1 stayed fairly faithful to the novel, but part 2 took some liberties that I felt were rather excessively non-novel. It looks like a prequel series will happen before part 3. My issue is: there's no prequel that was written as a novel, so what will it be pulled from? Or will it just be "based loosely" on the novel?
K
Also watched part 2 about a week or so ago after rewatching part 1. It's not as faithful to the book as I was hoping for. Part 1 stayed fairly faithful to the novel, but part 2 took some liberties that I felt were rather excessively non-novel. It looks like a prequel series will happen before part 3. My issue is: there's no prequel that was written as a novel, so what will it be pulled from? Or will it just be "based loosely" on the novel?
There is a bunch of other Dune written by Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert (Franks son). I think the series in production is taken from one of their books about the Bene Gesserit.
long_time_Dish
There is a bunch of other Dune written by Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert (Franks son). I think the series in production is taken from one of their books about the Bene Gesserit.
Correct. I've read all of them (yes, it took awhile, better part of a year, in my spare time). And they can't really consider or classify a series about the Bene Gesserit as a prequel. Sure, I suppose they can call it that, if they want to, because it begins before the time of Paul Atredies, but it's still a stretch. It's a Dune-related novel, not a prequel as we generally think of prequels...
long_time_Dish
Well, it looks good! I just hope they stayed close to the trilogy, but it doesn't look like it.
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 9 views