Social Feed

ncted
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum
Just a rumor/in-development product at this point:

Terms of Service Violation
33 Replies · 4592 views
harshness
Something very interesting about the box. There is a Max of two streams even on the 4 Tuner model. Only two tuners can transcode. They will get a lot of complaints.
Most households probably aren't watching more than a couple of OTA-sourced programs at once. Surely there are large families that depend largely on OTA that this product wouldn't be a good fit for but for many households, two streams is probably good enough.

To the point I think you were trying to make, it is perhaps misleading that the device has four tuners but can only stream two but it is no less misleading that something like the HR54 (that can't display a UHD stream on its own) can only stream one UHD program at a time yet AT&T will offer you multiple UHD clients.

The TiVo Bolt+ offers six tuners but it will only stream two sessions. The other streaming TiVos can only stream two cable programs.
S
Most households probably aren't watching more than a couple of OTA-sourced programs at once. Surely there are large families that depend largely on OTA that this product wouldn't be a good fit for but for many households, two streams is probably good enough.

To the point I think you were trying to make, it is perhaps misleading that the device has four tuners but can only stream two but it is no less misleading that something like the HR54 (that can't display a UHD stream on its own) can only stream one UHD program at a time yet AT&T will offer you multiple UHD clients.

The TiVo Bolt+ offers six tuners but it will only stream two sessions. The other streaming TiVos can only stream two cable programs.

Bad design shouldn't be transcoding to watch locally. Hdhomerun can record or stream on all tuners and playback on Fire devices. Makes no sense to record Mpeg 2 locally than force transcoding.
harshness
Bad design shouldn't be transcoding to watch locally.
Bad design is anything that doesn't allow the user to choose between the way something came and what ended up being transcoded. Both have their applications but you can't get the unadulterated source back if everything is transcoded.
Hdhomerun can record or stream on all tuners and playback on Fire devices.
I dispute your repeated assertion that all streaming devices must logically be Fire TV devices. Apparently you need to be reminded that HDHomeruns (even the transcoding model) don't support Roku devices without third party hardware and software. I would also remind you that the HDHomerun Extend (the aforementioned transcoding model) is currently only available as a two-tuner configuration so there's probably something to this two-stream limitation that we keep seeing.
Makes no sense to record Mpeg 2 locally than force transcoding.
Again, it should be the user's choice. Real-time transcoding is never ideal and something more deliberate (though certainly able to be performed automatically) usually gives better results in terms of net storage savings and picture quality (at the user's discretion). Applying lossy compression multiple times is never a good thing.
  • Like
Reactions: bharath_das
S
Bad design is anything that doesn't allow the user to choose between the way something came and what ended up being transcoded. Both have their applications but you can't get the unadulterated source back if everything is transcoded.I dispute your repeated assertion that all streaming devices must logically be Fire TV devices. Apparently you need to be reminded that HDHomeruns (even the transcoding model) don't support Roku devices without third party hardware and software. I would also remind you that the HDHomerun Extend (the aforementioned transcoding model) is currently only available as a two-tuner configuration so there's probably something to this two-stream limitation that we keep seeing.Again, it should be the user's choice. Real-time transcoding is never ideal and something more deliberate (though certainly able to be performed automatically) usually gives better results in terms of net storage savings and picture quality (at the user's discretion). Applying lossy compression multiple times is never a good thing.

How many times are you going to bring up Roku, when I NEVER mention it. Every response you give is what I am asserting or assuming. Please respond to the words that I actually post. Bring actual facts to the conversation other than "probably" The bottom line is people are not going to be happy with a 4 tuner model, when only 2 at a time can be watched.
harshness
How many times are you going to bring up Roku, when I NEVER mention it. Every response you give is what I am asserting or assuming.
When you ignore a decidedly significant portion of the population, you're likely to get some pushback.
Please respond to the words that I actually post. Bring actual facts to the conversation other than "probably" The bottom line is people are not going to be happy with a 4 tuner model, when only 2 at a time can be watched.
I did respond to the words you posted and reminded you that your be-all-and-end-all solution completely ignores the Roku population (there are more Roku-based televisions out there than FireTV-based TVs you know).

You're all over the two encoder limit of the Amazon box but you fail to cite an alternative that supports more than two MPEG2 sources so it is reasonable to posit that there's a practical limitation. I offered examples to support that two may indeed be the state-of-the-art.
S
When you ignore a decidedly significant portion of the population, you're likely to get some pushback.I did respond to the words you posted and reminded you that your be-all-and-end-all solution completely ignores the Roku population (there are more Roku-based televisions out there than FireTV-based TVs you know).

You're all over the two encoder limit of the Amazon box but you fail to cite an alternative that supports more than two MPEG2 sources so it is reasonable to posit that there's a practical limitation. I offered examples to support that two may indeed be the state-of-the-art.

Please refer me to where The New Amazon DVR supports Roku. I am comparing Hdhomerun with The Amazon DVR on Fire Devices ONLY. Please stay on subject.
harshness
Please refer me to where The New Amazon DVR supports Roku. I am comparing Hdhomerun with The Amazon DVR on Fire Devices ONLY. Please stay on subject.
The subject is the Amazon Recast. That you choose to infuse the discussion with a comparison to the HDHomerun family (without specifying which model) doesn't make it on topic and most definitely presents a moving target as a result of your lack of specificity.

In fact, there are perhaps more differences between the Recast and the HDHomerun family (including the DVR product) than there are similarities but you've largely ignored them.
harshness
CCN notes that EHD support will not be available at launch. This seems to be epidemic among these devices. The CCN article also claimed 150 hours recording capacity versus what I'd originally read as 75 hours.

Between all the blogs and the alpha tester's reports, I don't think we have a very clear picture yet.
S
The subject is the Amazon Recast. That you choose to infuse the discussion with a comparison to the HDHomerun family (without specifying which model) doesn't make it on topic and most definitely presents a moving target as a result of your lack of specificity.

In fact, there are perhaps more differences between the Recast and the HDHomerun family (including the DVR product) than there are similarities but you've largely ignored them.

Which Hdhomerun models am I ignoring specifically. The cable version, which the end user knows would not work. Older legacy models?. Please try to understand, the whole point of my post was to bring out the DIFFERENCES between to two. The main being the number of simultaneous streams. Again please stay on point. I am making very simple observations.
S
CCN notes that EHD support will not be available at launch. This seems to be epidemic among these devices. The CCN article also claimed 150 hours recording capacity versus what I'd originally read as 75 hours.

Between all the blogs and the alpha tester's reports, I don't think we have a very clear picture yet.
Well if you are set on getting your information from CCN, than we shouldn't really take anything as fact
harshness
Well if you are set on getting your information from CCN, than we shouldn't really take anything as fact
That goes exactly to my point. Thus far, most of the technical details have been blog posts and claims of downright awesomeness from AT&T employees.

You either have to wait or speculate and waiting does far less damage in cases like this.
harshness
Please try to understand, the whole point of my post was to bring out the DIFFERENCES between to two.
That's only valid if the thing that you're comparing against is the industry standard. Not everyone has bit into the SiliconDust (or FireTV) cake.

If the Amazon Recast has shortcomings, it isn't necessary (or even helpful) to drag a third party product into the discussion to illustrate them.
harshness
Which Hdhomerun models am I ignoring specifically.
It isn't that you're ignoring the HDHomerun family, it is that you're comparing the Recast to an undeclared member (or multiple members in combination) of that family.
Please try to understand, the whole point of my post was to bring out the DIFFERENCES between to two. The main being the number of simultaneous streams.
The Recast is a DVR. DVRs were developed around the concept of time shifting and that's something that the HDHomerun devices can be part of but it is not something they can do without considerable third party help. It is sort of like comparing a riding mower with a farm tractor and saying that the mower wins because you can fit more of them on your lawn.

Calling out the Recast as being limited versus a device that can't do what it does is simply not logical.
mr3p
Comparing the Recast to HDHR is understandable given the popularity of HDHR devices however a more comparable product to the Amazon Recast is TabloTV.
harshness
Comparing the Recast to HDHR is understandable given the popularity of HDHR devices however a more comparable product to the Amazon Recast is TabloTV.
Comparing one device to an entire product line isn't a fair and balanced comparison. As popular as the SiliconDust products are, most don't view the OTA world in terms of their product offerings.

The TabloTV (and perhaps an OTA TiVo) is a much more fitting comparison because you can easily identify what you're comparing against.
zippyfrog
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Did anyone have a price increase today on their equipment? I own my VIP211k's, and they have been $5.00. My bill that I received last week shows the "add-ons" as being $5.00. However, I just logged into my Dish account, and my "add-ons" are now $10.00. Did the additional receivers go up by $5.00 recently?

As I mentioned, my last bill shows $5.00 and under the notes, nothing is mentioned about a price increase.
3 Replies · 29 views
zippyfrog
Never mind - according to chat, it seems like there is a glitch in their website. The prices for owned receivers are still $5.00.
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby
zippyfrog
However, when I make a change (tried to add the Columbian pack for $2 so I could generate my bill) and there is a new line - it says "Access for TV" - whereas previously that line item was not there. I hope they aren't charging $5.00 for the initial TV now...

1781191675068.webp
T
Apparently it's not an "owned receiver" fee but rather an extension fee that's applied to 2nd and subsequent viewing. Maybe that played into their decision to force a box at every TV- garnering those fees
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
67106 Replies · 2662256 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
ClarkGable
No Time - The Guess Who
  • Like
Reactions: sdfntx
harshness
Time After Time - Cyndi Lauper
sdfntx
Right on Time - Brandi Carlile
gms49ers
Time Stand Still - Rush
Bobby
I Can't Help It (If I'm Still In Love With You) - B.J. Thomas
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in SatelliteGuys Support Center
Our DNS provider is encouraging us to enable DNSSEC on our domains for added security.

I have gone ahead and enabled it, and am told it may take anywhere from 90 minutes to 24 hours for it to take effect.

Hopefully doing this does not harm the site in any way. (It shouldn't) but if it does, you will then know why and I will revert the settings.

But from what I am reading it should be ok. so just giving a warning as I have screwed up DNS stuff in the past. :D
1 Replies · 26 views
Scott Greczkowski
Doing my checks it appears the changes have gone through... and we are still here. (Phew!)
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in SatelliteGuys Support Center
Due to security concerns and the fact that the Tapatalk Plugin for Xenforo is no longer being updated we have removed Tapatalk support from SatelliteGuys.

For those who were using it we recommend using our PWA App instead which is faster and does not have all the spam Tapatalk had. Below is a graphic showing how to add SatelliteGuys to your devices home screen. (While iOS is shown the process is mostly the same for Android.)

add_to_home.gif

Thanks for your understanding. :)
7 Replies · 180 views
Foxbat
Thank you, Scott, for adding years to my Life and dropping my BP a few millimeters! Money well spent…
dweber
Thank you, Scott, for adding years to my Life and dropping my BP a few millimeters! Money well spent…
What is PWA app? PWA utilities seem to be a Spanish app. I hope you are seeing this since nothing seems to be working. I will miss SatelliteGuys. Tapatalk worked well. The Siri browser doesn't seem to work well.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Peter Parker
Thank you, Scott, for adding years to my Life and dropping my BP a few millimeters! Money well spent…
Hooray!
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Peter Parker
What is PWA app? PWA utilities seem to be a Spanish app. I hope you are seeing this since nothing seems to be working. I will miss SatelliteGuys. Tapatalk worked well. The Siri browser doesn't seem to work well.
Do you mean the safari browser?
Foxbat
What is PWA app? PWA utilities seem to be a Spanish app. I hope you are seeing this since nothing seems to be working. I will miss SatelliteGuys. Tapatalk worked well. The Siri browser doesn't seem to work well.
Actually, PWA stands for "Progressive Web Application" and is basically just saving a site's homepage to your desktop where it appears as an "App" with the rest of your smartphone's Apps.
1781162703297.webp
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Scott Greczkowski
A PWA is a custom version of SatelliteGuys which is optimized for mobile devices. While it may look like the website, its actually different so that only the files needed for mobile are sent, meaning its a much faster experience all around.

TapaTalk is essentially dead. It was written for PHP 5.4 and we are now running PHP 8.4. There have been a LOT of PHP security updates since then and since Tapatalk for Xenforo has not been updated in a long long time it is not the safest idea to keep running it.

In addition those trying to view the site on their mobile devices using a browser were getting spammed on the top of the screen for people to install TapaTalk, this ad in some cases would take up 20% of the users screen. We could get rid of that ad but we would have to pay $20 a month to get rid of it.

Screenshot 2026-06-11 085611.webp



In addition TapaTalk could and was inserting their own ads on SatelliteGuys in the app which only benefitted them, SatelliteGuys was not paid for those ads they were displaying on our site. Again we could pay to get rid of those ads.

Screenshot 2026-06-11 085641.webp


And here was the cost of the Premium Tier.

Screenshot 2026-06-11 085701.webp


Now to make matters worse Tapatalk recently announced that they are going to start charging users of the app 99 cents a month to continue using it.

Screenshot 2026-06-11 090141.webp



So soon you would be paying them each month to access SatelliteGuys via their app, again all the money going to them... and you would still see all their ads too.

Tapatalk was a great program which we run for many many years, and for a long time we DID pay for the premium tier. But now with such a small offset using it (My numbers show a total of 6 members) it wasn't work paying for any longer.

In addition Tapatalk was sold to a different owner who made lots of promises of improvements and updates but then that owner has been really radio silent since, instead they have been letting TapaTalk rot on the vine.

If you visit their support forum at https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/tapatalksupport/ you will see there is not much going on, in fact most of the support questions posted there go unanswered.

Please give the PWA a try, I was a die hard Tapatalk user myself but now only use the PWA on devices. It is a much better all around experience, with no bloatware or additional ads based on your user membership level.

I don't have an android phone so I could not make a graphic showing you how to add SatelliteGuys PWA to your phones apps or home screen. But here is a site that explains how to do it on all kinds of devices. How to Install a PWA on iOS, Android, Windows & Mac [2025 Guide]

The above link also explains PWA's better as well. :)

If Tapatalk were to update their plugins so we know we are more secure and up to date and allow us to remove the "Smart Banner" without having to pay $20 a month, we would consider adding it back. I don't even care about their ads, as if a user wants to use their app and is willing to sit through their ads in order to use that app then I am ok with it.

But hopefully that explains better why it was removed. It was not done to cut anyone off from the site. :) Please give the PWA a try.
NYDutch
A PWA is a custom version of SatelliteGuys which is optimized for mobile devices. While it may look like the website, its actually different so that only the files needed for mobile are sent, meaning its a much faster experience all around.

TapaTalk is essentially dead. It was written for PHP 5.4 and we are now running PHP 8.4. There have been a LOT of PHP security updates since then and since Tapatalk for Xenforo has not been updated in a long long time it is not the safest idea to keep running it.

In addition those trying to view the site on their mobile devices using a browser were getting spammed on the top of the screen for people to install TapaTalk, this ad in some cases would take up 20% of the users screen. We could get rid of that ad but we would have to pay $20 a month to get rid of it.

View attachment 191729


In addition TapaTalk could and was inserting their own ads on SatelliteGuys in the app which only benefitted them, SatelliteGuys was not paid for those ads they were displaying on our site. Again we could pay to get rid of those ads.

View attachment 191730

And here was the cost of the Premium Tier.

View attachment 191731

Now to make matters worse Tapatalk recently announced that they are going to start charging users of the app 99 cents a month to continue using it.

View attachment 191732


So soon you would be paying them each month to access SatelliteGuys via their app, again all the money going to them... and you would still see all their ads too.

Tapatalk was a great program which we run for many many years, and for a long time we DID pay for the premium tier. But now with such a small offset using it (My numbers show a total of 6 members) it wasn't work paying for any longer.

In addition Tapatalk was sold to a different owner who made lots of promises of improvements and updates but then that owner has been really radio silent since, instead they have been letting TapaTalk rot on the vine.

If you visit their support forum at https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/tapatalksupport/ you will see there is not much going on, in fact most of the support questions posted there go unanswered.

Please give the PWA a try, I was a die hard Tapatalk user myself but now only use the PWA on devices. It is a much better all around experience, with no bloatware or additional ads based on your user membership level.

I don't have an android phone so I could not make a graphic showing you how to add SatelliteGuys PWA to your phones apps or home screen. But here is a site that explains how to do it on all kinds of devices. How to Install a PWA on iOS, Android, Windows & Mac [2025 Guide]

The above link also explains PWA's better as well. :)

If Tapatalk were to update their plugins so we know we are more secure and up to date and allow us to remove the "Smart Banner" without having to pay $20 a month, we would consider adding it back. I don't even care about their ads, as if a user wants to use their app and is willing to sit through their ads in order to use that app then I am ok with it.

But hopefully that explains better why it was removed. It was not done to cut anyone off from the site. :) Please give the PWA a try.
I just installed the PWA on my Android phone. It was pretty easy to do, and now I'm posting this from my phone. Thanks, Scott!
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in SatelliteGuys Support Center
As you may have noticed we are doing a Fund Raiser for SatelliteGuys!

As many of you know I have been paying for a majority of the operation of the site out of my own pocket for awhile now. Now looking at things we have a number of renewals coming up that I could use some help with. These renewals include the license renewal for our Forum Software, Renewal of a number of our add on's the site uses, renewal of domain names etc.

I have set a goal of $400.00 - any extra that comes in will just go to fund the operations of the site. None of the money will go to me (I tried BuyMeACoffee a few months ago, and they denied me saying they do not do business with Satellite Piracy sites... which we are not... hell we host the beta programs for both DISH and DIRECTV here...)

Anyways... if you would like to help out please click the link below.


Thank you in advance. :)
18 Replies · 560 views
Scott Greczkowski
I planned on removing it today, but then my fathers car broke down and I had to drive him all around to get his stuff done. Then I had a doctors appointment after that which was annoying...

Dr asks me if I have had any changes, so I tell him something wrong with me that started a month or so ago and his reply back is, that it sucks to get old... I hate that. Why ask me. if your going to come back with a smart ass answer.

Anyays I hope to get rid of Tapatalk tomorrow. :)

And we had more people donate today, thank you! The extra money is going to future expenses since things like add ons don't expire at the same time.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU AGAIN!
T
Yeah, dr's...joint pain? Your joints are wearing out. It hurts when I do this...don't do that
comfortably_numb
Dr asks me if I have had any changes, so I tell him something wrong with me that started a month or so ago and his reply back is, that it sucks to get old

No excuse for a flippant response like that from a doctor! I'd be looking for a different one.
Scott Greczkowski
Tapatalk has been removed.

I have added a new feature which is a work in progress called "Social Feed" which displays the forums Facebook style. Its nice for people who like that, but needs work. But i have been watching this one for awhile and the author is being really responsive to suggestions and adding them. So if you have any please let me know and I can pass them along. :)
navychop
😍
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Scott Greczkowski
We got more kind donations yesterday! Again a very big thank you to everyone for your support!
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
111 Replies · 2723 views
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat and meStevo
Foxbat
Awesome pictures, Yespage! Thanks!

I caught the end of the four hour race on YouTube so I wasn't "spoiled", but got to see the exciting last lap action in the TCR division!
Y
Awesome pictures, Yespage! Thanks!

I caught the end of the four hour race on YouTube so I wasn't "spoiled", but got to see the exciting last lap action in the TCR division!
I heard on the radio, after the final pitstop, Turner Motorsport were resigned to second place. 'You're in second. Don't worry about it. First is McLaren, we aren't catching them.'
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Y
Caught up to the 500... err... k in St. Louis. What a race! Andretti Motorsport were doing very well with Ericsson and Kirkwood, meanwhile Power was moving up the grid. Veekay started cautiously. He was working the tires just right, becoming more lethal later in the stint. Rasmussen was racing likewise, not nearly as insane as he has in the past. Palou was leading the race, in a shocker to all. Caio Collet was having a wonderful ride, making Ferucci potentially sweat a bit. Rain came, rain went, rain came, rain went. Generally mild sprinkles, but enough to pause racing on an oval.

Palou would kind of send Siegel into the wall. Siegel really didn't do much wrong. As he noted, you have to turn at some point. Palou had acres of room below and Siegel might have had his ticket out of Indycar stamped. Dixon was doing the fuel thing and got busted twice by yellows, not pitting before the flag came out. Then the most critical happened... Palou ran out of gas on pit lane, effectively giving Newgarden the race lead and win. Newgarden had a very early pit, so he was able to slide in, get service and go. Meanwhile, everyone else was confused and stuck behind Palou for a bit. Once people figured what was happening, Newgarden had a major advantage of several seconds. Newgarden wouldn't look back and when it went green again, he'd hold the lead for the win.

Massive credit to Juncos Hollinger who bested Penske in getting Veekay out before Malukas in a transition that was oddly bizarre. I haven't had time to check, but I'm wondering if Veekay was about to run out of fuel or cut a tire. He was charging late in a stint, got up to fifth, and then tailed back for a few laps to 10th or 11th. It looked like it was over. Went into the pits, and after the pitting sequence was over, Veekay was well inside the top ten again. It was weird. And he charged, getting up to fourth. He made a late move on Rasmussen, but Rasmussen held his position with some great driving. In fact, there was a ton of incredible racing passing, not passing all race long. Veekay would finish 4th. A podium would have been awesome, but it is a great outcome for a guy who hopefully will get a break with a big team. We saw what Veekay could do with a Honda last season with fuel save, imagine replacing Simpson on Ganassi and having speed to go with fuel saving. His 6th at Indy and 4th at St. Louis get him up to 13th in the points standings and only 5 points outside of the top 10.

Ericsson finished second, resigned to finishing behind the current best in the world guy on a short oval. Rasmussen got the final step on the podium, a nice rebound to what has been an otherwise bad year for him, and a good reward to ECR who just extended his contract.
Y
They raced USAC cars at Daytona once. Once! People died. Aj Foyt said 'f this', and left after the first go around. AJ freaking Foyt thought it was crazy! And cars weren't nearly as fast as they are now.

I think they tried Talladega once too.
Y
LeMans qualifying on going. WEC has d9ne a great job expanding the automotive company entries. Even without Porsche, a large nunber of manufacturers.
Peter Parker
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I have had good experiences with Brave but lately I am frustrated with it.

Now when I launch the app it shows a box at the bottom asking if I want to go back to the last opened page. It is in conveniently located and I would prefer to eliminate it.

Does anyone know how to do this?

Please let's not sidetrack the discussion into an exploration of why I don't care for it or a lecture about all the wonderful aspects of the feature. I just do not care for it.
3 Replies · 69 views
b4pjoe
I don't have an Android phone so I don't know if this will apply to the Brave settings on your android device but it works on the desktop for me.

Change this setting to either startup to a different website or a new tab page. I have mine set to open to google.com instead of where I left off and it doesn't ask me at the next startup if I want to open the last opened page unless it crashed.

Screenshot 2026-06-10 at 6.46.20 PM.webp
Peter Parker
I don't have an Android phone so I don't know if this will apply to the Brave settings on your android device but it works on the desktop for me.

Change this setting to either startup to a different website or a new tab page. I have mine set to open to google.com instead of where I left off and it doesn't ask me at the next startup if I want to open the last opened page unless it crashed.

View attachment 191721
Thank you for trying to help. However thrse choices do not appear in Android. There is a setting for "New Tab Pages" that is similar but does not include your choice. I have tried all of the existing entries with no success
  • Like
Reactions: b4pjoe
Juan
Something like this maybe


Option 2: Set a custom Home button URL
  1. Click the menu icon in the top-right corner and select Settings.
  2. Click on Appearance in the left sidebar.
  3. Toggle on the Show home button switch.
  4. Under the home button settings, select the option to Enter custom web address and type in your preferred website. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
BlackHitachi
Supporting Founder
Last reply · posted in Movie Talk
Since the Reds have there thread we should too!

Last watched Nine inch Nails
Next 3:10 to Yuma
5346 Replies · 509289 views
osu1991
Rooster Cogburn.

Keep forgetting the free movies on youtube are ad free with my premium subscription.
dfergie
Rooster Cogburn.

Keep forgetting the free movies on youtube are ad free with my premium subscription.
There are some really good movies on youtube.
Saving Private Ryan 4k, Dolby Atmos...
harshness
Saving Private Ryan 4k, Dolby Atmos...
These are severely limited. Getting better than stereo audio is improving, but still has a long way to go.
dfergie
These are severely limited. Getting better than stereo audio is improving, but still has a long way to go.
I went with my 4k disc after checking out that version.
osu1991

View: https://youtu.be/I68627xyDPA?is=gUZB0Yv_08pE0DR3


Tonight revisiting one of my favorites. Ranks up there with Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark and Hunt For Red October.
dfergie
Watching Monterey Pop, been awhile, had the DVD, but probably lost in the fire 10.5 years ago. HBOmax
"MysteryMan"
813WnPwdB3L._SX342_.webp
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie