Social Feed

D
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I've been trying to order the digital adaptor and antenna needed to get my locals since the Nexstar thing started. Each time I try it says try later. So now I am on hold hoping they can help me get it ordered.


Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
12 Replies · 1759 views
D
I finally got through. They said they would send us one in 3-7 business days free of charge. It was a 35 minute wait but worth getting for free.


Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
sktrus
I finally got through. They said they would send us one in 3-7 business days free of charge. It was a 35 minute wait but worth getting for free.


Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
Hopefully, that will take care of things. If u r too far, u may need a better antenna (as Crodrules mentioned here). I am fed up, too. Ordered airtv tuner and a roof antenna (which I will install in the attic :rolleyes:). Keeping fingers crossed.
lparsons21
Hopefully, that will take care of things. If u r too far, u may need a better antenna (as Crodrules mentioned here). I am fed up, too. Ordered airtv tuner and a roof antenna (which I will install in the attic :rolleyes:). Keeping fingers crossed.

For info, if it matters, the AirTV OTA tuner doesn't do DD5.1 audio. Amazon's Recast does but is locked into the FireTV ecosystem.
Bobby
For info, if it matters, the AirTV OTA tuner doesn't do DD5.1 audio. Amazon's Recast does but is locked into the FireTV ecosystem.
I don't have the AirTV tuner, I have the DISH Lark tuner, and that Lark tuner does 5.1 just fine. I just tested it on an OTA channel. I went to the satellite channel first, listened and then looked at my AVR, and then went to the next channel which is OTA and it was exactly the same. If the AirTV tuner has exactly the same internal parts that the Lark does it should be equal.
lparsons21
I don't have the AirTV tuner, I have the DISH Lark tuner, and that Lark tuner does 5.1 just fine. I just tested it on an OTA channel. I went to the satellite channel first, listened and then looked at my AVR, and then went to the next channel which is OTA and it was exactly the same. If the AirTV tuner has exactly the same internal parts that the Lark dies it should be equal.

The AirTV boxes use the SlingTV app so it may be a SlingTV app issue since SlingTV's streaming service is all stereo.
  • Like
Reactions: TheKrell
Bobby
The AirTV boxes use the SlingTV app so it may be a SlingTV app issue since SlingTV's streaming service is all stereo.
I also have an AirTV box along with an AirTV Mini and you are correct. Access that way only gets stereo. That, however, is different from the dongle tuner.
  • Like
Reactions: pattykay
lparsons21
I also have an AirTV box along with an AirTV Mini and you are correct. Access that way only gets stereo. That, however, is different from the dongle tuner.

I talked to Sling and AirTV support today. The Sling guy was of no real help and sent me over to AirTV support. The woman I talked to said she would bring up the lack of DD5.1 on AirTV to the developers at the next meeting.

Currently I switch between the Roku Ultra and FireTV Cube since the Recast is just a better performer with its 2 week guide and DD5.1 support. Don't particularly care for the UI on the FireTV though.
  • Like
Reactions: TheKrell
MrDRC
I can confirm the AirTV adapter is passing 5.1 through the hopper. Just got it today, hooked it up and sent the straight single through my AVR and it shows 5.1 and sounds like it too. Went to another channel to A/B what I knew for sure was 5.1 and same thing...all 5.1 as long as the source is 5.1. VERY happy with the AirTV adapter.

On another note, reagarding the heat issue previously reported. Right now the adapter has been hooked up for several hours and it's warm, not hot. If it becomes hot I'll try one of the power blocks I read about elsewhere. So far so good though.
Jim5506
IIRC the AirTV adapter has not had a heating problem. It was the previous dual tuner dongle by Hauppauge, I believe, (with a removable USB cable) that overheated.
Marques Brownlee
· posted in Marques Brownlee
0 Replies · 1 views
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
· posted in The Chit Chat Club
0 Replies · 4 views
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68633 Replies · 2679035 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
FTA4PA
Strange Days - Nazareth
gms49ers
Dancing Days - Led Zeppelin
dishstaller
Dancing in the Street - Van Halen
long_time_Dish
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
Bobby
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
Let me fix that for you:
Baker Street - Gerry Rafferty
JSheridan
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I know HipKat said that they were working on conversions but we got the official news yesterday right from Dish that starting next month all DMA's will be on the western arc, and all customers will be assigned to that. That's gonna mean a lot of customers around here aren't gonna get Dish unless there are exceptions. Too many mountains and trees.
172 Replies · 4915 views
S
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Jimbo
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Mister B
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
S
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
can't forget the little blue m&m's
charlesrshell
can't forget the little blue m&m's
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
T
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Foxbat
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
Because he didn't have a fleet of reusable rockets. Starlink works because SpaceX is able to launch hundreds (thousands?) of their Starlink satellites for what a single geostationary Internet satellite costs to build and launch on a disposable launcher.
T
But how is it reusable if it's disposable
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
My gf is 29 years younger than me :shh
Almighty1
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
He does not have the resources aka $$$ compared to Elon Musk as in reality, Elon can eat Charlie for lunch or even mop the floor with Charlie if he wanted to.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Movie Talk
53 Replies · 10074 views
long_time_Dish
Also watched part 2 about a week or so ago after rewatching part 1. It's not as faithful to the book as I was hoping for. Part 1 stayed fairly faithful to the novel, but part 2 took some liberties that I felt were rather excessively non-novel. It looks like a prequel series will happen before part 3. My issue is: there's no prequel that was written as a novel, so what will it be pulled from? Or will it just be "based loosely" on the novel?
K
Also watched part 2 about a week or so ago after rewatching part 1. It's not as faithful to the book as I was hoping for. Part 1 stayed fairly faithful to the novel, but part 2 took some liberties that I felt were rather excessively non-novel. It looks like a prequel series will happen before part 3. My issue is: there's no prequel that was written as a novel, so what will it be pulled from? Or will it just be "based loosely" on the novel?
There is a bunch of other Dune written by Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert (Franks son). I think the series in production is taken from one of their books about the Bene Gesserit.
long_time_Dish
There is a bunch of other Dune written by Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert (Franks son). I think the series in production is taken from one of their books about the Bene Gesserit.
Correct. I've read all of them (yes, it took awhile, better part of a year, in my spare time). And they can't really consider or classify a series about the Bene Gesserit as a prequel. Sure, I suppose they can call it that, if they want to, because it begins before the time of Paul Atredies, but it's still a stretch. It's a Dune-related novel, not a prequel as we generally think of prequels...
long_time_Dish
Well, it looks good! I just hope they stayed close to the trilogy, but it doesn't look like it.
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 7 views