There's a definite line being drawn and, in my opinion, terms being re-defined in the radio industry. "Local" should be more and more defined by whether ownership has a stake in the community, as in, announcers spending paychecks, or at least living locally; and...does the station have a local studio that generates programming (not just relaying it) and...is the programming adjusted as needed to fit the community. If a station can't meet those terms and definitions, then it goes under the definition of "corporate" be it commercial, non-commercial, or religious. YES, "religious" radio can be corporate, too and just as guilty of being not in touch with their listeners as their commercial counterparts. It bothered me from day one that religious stations could cry, "we cant support a local studio" and were then allowed to have a satellite dish, transmitter hut, EAS box, and still keep their licenses. Owning a "signal" to me is much different than owning a "station"...and in many big corporate examples, the companies don't own stations, they own "signals." A "Station" is defined as follows: "a place or building where a specified activity or service is based" BASED. Not relayed, not retransmitted, BASED. Perhaps a new definition in radio needs to emerge. STATIONS are locally owned, operated, and programmed. "SIGNALS" are anything else, with the programming based anywhere else outside of a particular signal's listening-area. By the way for purposes of this writing, I use "corporate" to refer to large ownership, not the structure of a small radio company which can also be a corporation yet, operate LOCALLY.