Social Feed

pattykay
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Check this out, everybody:

This should make it a lot easier for subscribers on Eastern Arc to "move" to the following markets:
  • Charlottesville, VA
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Louisville, KY
Plus, CONUS HD feeds of PBS from:
  • Owensboro, KY (Evansville, IN market)
  • Lexington, KY
  • Little Rock, AR
  • Paducah, KY
Along with these changes, it looks like the Casper, WY HD locals have been completely removed from the 129 satellite, to be exclusively in CONUS on the 77 satellite instead. However, the Casper, WY standard-def feeds are now CONUS at 129.
28 Replies · 8674 views
B
I get the Louisville locals...…..is there any real significance to this?
pattykay
I get the Louisville locals...…..is there any real significance to this?
People with a mixed-arc setup (such as Western Arc plus a side dish pointed at 77) are getting letters from Dish, advising them of the need for a re-point, or a flip to the full Eastern Arc instead. It allows Dish to install the standard 1000.2 dish going forward, instead of needing to install a 1000.4 (plus a DPH42 switch for Hopper 3 installs). If you already have a 1000.4 Eastern Arc dish, no action is needed, but you can downgrade to the smaller 1000.2 dish if you wish.

If Louisville is the designated DMA for your location, then no, there's no significance to them being on a spot or CONUS beam.
The HD feeds on Eastern Arc are CONUS either way. They are simply moving from 77 to 72 instead. Those who are getting the SD feeds on spotbeam from the 110 satellite may be impacted by this, when Dish decides to finally remove those. This move allows Dish to flip those subscribers to Eastern Arc using the standard 1000.2 dish.
  • Like
Reactions: NYDutch
pattykay
Apparently completing the changes heralded by the uplink reported in the original post, the following markets have now been completely removed from the 77 satellite:
  • Charlottesville, VA
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Davenport, IA/Rock Island, IL
  • Evansville, IN
  • Little Rock, AR
  • Louisville, KY
  • Paducah, KY/Harrisburg, IL
Rafaelccs
People with a mixed-arc setup (such as Western Arc plus a side dish pointed at 77) are getting letters from Dish, advising them of the need for a re-point, or a flip to the full Eastern Arc instead. It allows Dish to install the standard 1000.2 dish going forward, instead of needing to install a 1000.4 (plus a DPH42 switch for Hopper 3 installs). If you already have a 1000.4 Eastern Arc dish, no action is needed, but you can downgrade to the smaller 1000.2 dish if you wish.


The HD feeds on Eastern Arc are CONUS either way. They are simply moving from 77 to 72 instead. Those who are getting the SD feeds on spotbeam from the 110 satellite may be impacted by this, when Dish decides to finally remove those. This move allows Dish to flip those subscribers to Eastern Arc using the standard 1000.2 dish.
Hello crodrules, you think this is the real reason for these moves? sounds more like making up space for 4K? or optimizing the spectrum usage, probably they don't have same funds to launch replacement birds and they're optimizing their operation......(just my two cents) seems a lot of work sending letters to customers that already have whatever 1000.4 or 1000.2 and forcing them to migrate to eastern arc...what about those that have LOS (Line OF Sight) compromised......
Regards.....
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
pattykay
Hello crodrules, you think this is the real reason for these moves? sounds more like making up space for 4K? or optimizing the spectrum usage, probably they don't have same funds to launch replacement birds and they're optimizing their operation......(just my two cents) seems a lot of work sending letters to customers that already have whatever 1000.4 or 1000.2 and forcing them to migrate to eastern arc...what about those that have LOS (Line OF Sight) compromised......
Regards.....
I can think of a couple of reasons that are more plausible.

First, if I remember correctly, Dish didn't exactly manufacture a very large quantity of 1000.4 dishes and LNB's. (At least, not when compared to the number of 1000.2 dishes and LNB's in existence.) So, it is possible that Dish is running out of stock on that model. Therefore, they may have felt that it is not a good idea to continue to put locals on a satellite (77) that specifically requires that model (1000.4 EA) for a standard installation.

The other factor to consider is "moving" (or using a service address other than where you are actually located). On the one hand, putting some CONUS local markets on 72 makes "moving" to those markets easier, by making them available with the more standard 1000.2 dish. However, the real factor may have been that using the 77 satellite made it much easier to receive those signals in Mexico, where people are not supposed to be subscribing to US Dish service at all. (Dish has a separate Dish Mexico service for them.) So, another likely reason for this move was to crack down on people illegally receiving US network service in Mexico, and try to get them to switch to Dish Mexico instead.

Just my two cents.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Rafaelccs
I can think of a couple of reasons that are more plausible.

First, if I remember correctly, Dish didn't exactly manufacture a very large quantity of 1000.4 dishes and LNB's. (At least, not when compared to the number of 1000.2 dishes and LNB's in existence.) So, it is possible that Dish is running out of stock on that model. Therefore, they may have felt that it is not a good idea to continue to put locals on a satellite (77) that specifically requires that model (1000.4 EA) for a standard installation.

The other factor to consider is "moving" (or using a service address other than where you are actually located). On the one hand, putting some CONUS local markets on 72 makes "moving" to those markets easier, by making them available with the more standard 1000.2 dish. However, the real factor may have been that using the 77 satellite made it much easier to receive those signals in Mexico, where people are not supposed to be subscribing to US Dish service at all. (Dish has a separate Dish Mexico service for them.) So, another likely reason for this move was to crack down on people illegally receiving US network service in Mexico, and try to get them to switch to Dish Mexico instead.

Just my two cents.
Could be.....but Streaming is hurting both Dish and DirecTV, people around the world are streaming even locals using VPN and or other methods, I saw your other post of HBO & Max returning to Dishnetwork...that for me is a sign that they're making moves to recover customers, I really can't remember how long ago Dish dropped HBO because of their fees.....they have not reached an agreement the Fees are even probably higher...in my view, customers like to have no surprises, unless for a good or better reason, if these moves require free antennas and alignment I see no problem, if they do it free with customer commitment.....who knows.
These moves have to cost them money if they cost money but at the end they optimized spectrum or any other financial reason that make more sense to me.....
Regards.
  • Like
Reactions: pattykay
D
Could be.....but Streaming is hurting both Dish and DirecTV, people around the world are streaming even locals using VPN and or other methods, I saw your other post of HBO & Max returning to Dishnetwork...that for me is a sign that they're making moves to recover customers, I really can't remember how long ago Dish dropped HBO because of their fees.....they have not reached an agreement the Fees are even probably higher...in my view, customers like to have no surprises, unless for a good or better reason, if these moves require free antennas and alignment I see no problem, if they do it free with customer commitment.....who knows.
These moves have to cost them money if they cost money but at the end they optimized spectrum or any other financial reason that make more sense to me.....
Regards.
The possible return of HBO is more likely the result of Discovery Networks now "running" the Warner Media channels, not AT&T who are still part owners. I think Dish has better relations with Discovery Networks, and Discovery Networks attitude is probably that it is better to get some money from Dish than nothing at all since Dish has not been in any hurry to bring back HBO. However, I would not expect the full suite of HBO channels as before. IMHO, it will likely be an "HBO Lite" suite with some VOD access at a lower price than other MVPD's who have the entire suite at a higher price. It would be a way of getting money from Dish while not destroying the "FULL" value other MVPD's have paying for the full suite. All that is IMHO. I think Dish has always been open to a more financially reasonable (for Dish, that is) way of providing HBO, but AT&T always showed Dish (a competitor) the "hand," while Discovery Networks seems willing to make a deal and find some way to get HBO back on Dish (and take Dish's money) that makes sense for Discovery.
  • Like
Reactions: Rafaelccs
NYDutch
If my remaining memory cells still work, I recall Dish dropped HBO over a requirement for an excessive subscriber count payment regardless of how many fewer actual subscribers there were. If that over payment requirement was close to or exceeded any net profit from the actual paying subscribers, then it didn't make sense for Dish to "hurt their pocket" by continuing to carry HBO.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
lakebum431
The possible return of HBO is more likely the result of Discovery Networks now "running" the Warner Media channels, not AT&T who are still part owners. I think Dish has better relations with Discovery Networks, and Discovery Networks attitude is probably that it is better to get some money from Dish than nothing at all since Dish has not been in any hurry to bring back HBO. However, I would not expect the full suite of HBO channels as before. IMHO, it will likely be an "HBO Lite" suite with some VOD access at a lower price than other MVPD's who have the entire suite at a higher price. It would be a way of getting money from Dish while not destroying the "FULL" value other MVPD's have paying for the full suite. All that is IMHO. I think Dish has always been open to a more financially reasonable (for Dish, that is) way of providing HBO, but AT&T always showed Dish (a competitor) the "hand," while Discovery Networks seems willing to make a deal and find some way to get HBO back on Dish (and take Dish's money) that makes sense for Discovery.
I like the thought process, but probably not since the deal isn't expected to close for another year or so...
pattykay
If that over payment requirement was close to or exceeded any net profit from the actual paying subscribers, then it didn't make sense for Dish to "hurt their pocket" by continuing to carry HBO.
This is compounded by the fact that most of the "actual paying subscribers" (on this site, anyway) were never paying Dish full price for HBO in the first place. Most people here with HBO either got locked in with the $10 "lifetime" rate, or frequently took advantage of the various half-price deals. In addition, Dish frequently offered qualified customers HBO and/or Cinemax for free for six months, or even a whole year at a time. Then of course there were the new customer offers, which included HBO and Cinemax for free for three months. All told, this is not a good way to ensure long-term subscriptions at full price. There likely was no real profit from the paying subscribers in the first place. It was simply a loss leader, and a perk to attract and retain customers. Many of those customers could just as easily be attracted or retained by other perks, such as freebies on other premium packages.
pattykay
Apparently completing the changes heralded by the uplink reported in the original post, the following markets have now been completely removed from the 77 satellite:
So, when I posted this, I had forgotten about Lexington, KY and apparently Dish forgot about that market, too.
Did they also move Lexington, KY permanently from 77 to 72?
James Long's local listings page has not been updated with the 6/16/2021 changes yet. However, since Lexington was not listed in the uplink report that I linked in post number 11, I would guess it is still safe at 77, for now. You can check the satellites and transponders needed for each local market here: Local Channels on DISH Network (Unofficial Listing)
That page is updated now. Lexington, KY is still at 77. Along with Casper, WY and Springfield, MO they are the only markets left at 77 now.
Dish has now fixed this, and Lexington, KY has also been removed from 77 as of today:

Lexington, KY locals are now exclusively on spotbeam on 61.5 for the HD feeds. (SD feeds on spotbeam at 110.)

Casper, WY and Springfield, MO are now the only remaining markets at 77. Since Springfield, MO is also being simulcast on spotbeam at 61.5, it is likely just a matter of time before that market follows suit just like Lexington did.
D
If my remaining memory cells still work, I recall Dish dropped HBO over a requirement for an excessive subscriber count payment regardless of how many fewer actual subscribers there were. If that over payment requirement was close to or exceeded any net profit from the actual paying subscribers, then it didn't make sense for Dish to "hurt their pocket" by continuing to carry HBO.
And you have to wonder if that requirement was intended to have Dish drop HBO, and then adding value to AT&T services--its DirecTV satellite competitor to Dish satellite. services--and the OTT Sling denied as AT&T also competes with Dish on OTT. Sometimes companies and even government agencies propose "poison pill" requirements to steer things towards their plans while giving the appearance of "negotiating."
  • Like
Reactions: NYDutch
D
I like the thought process, but probably not since the deal isn't expected to close for another year or so...
Well, that timeline is for the "merge" but AT&T can have Discovery Networks be its "distributor" any time it wants without any merger. So, in theory, HBO can be on Dish pretty much at any time. It sure seems AT&T just does not want to deal with the "distribution" part of the HBO/Warner Media channels business (AT&T knows they are NOT good at it and Discovery Networks is excellent at distribution/agreements, especially using its own Discovery Channels as leverage) and AT&T wants to just focus on its content and subsequent revenue stream from its Warner Media channels.
pattykay
Plus, CONUS HD feeds of PBS from:
  • Owensboro, KY (Evansville, IN market)
  • Lexington, KY
  • Little Rock, AR
  • Paducah, KY
Evansville, Lexington, and Paducah all had their CONUS PBS feeds removed from 72.7 today:
Uplinks Removed
...
5275 WKOH (31 HD Local) OWENSBORO, KY (PBS) removed from 72.7° TP 6 (HD Evansville, IN market Hidden)
5155 WKLE (46 HD Local) LEXINGTON, KY (PBS) removed from 72.7° TP 6 (HD Lexington, KY market Hidden)
5154 WKPD (29 HD Local) PADUCAH, KY (PBS) removed from 72.7° TP 6 (HD Paducah, KY/Harrisburg, IL market Hidden)


However, Lexington still has a duplicate channel number (channel 5169) of the exact same PBS station on the exact same CONUS transponder:
Lexington, KY
18-00​
WLEXLEXINGTON, KY (NBC) -9207 SD 110° 4s10 A ()5152 HD 61.5° 31s7 A (nbc)
27-00​
WKYTLEXINGTON, KY (CBS) -9206 SD 110° 4s10 A ()5151 HD 61.5° 31s7 A (cbs)
28-00​
WKYT2LEXINGTON, KY (CW) -9209 SD 110° 4s10 A9209 SD 61.5° 31s7 A
36-00​
WTVQLEXINGTON, KY (ABC) -9205 SD 110° 4s10 A ()5150 HD 61.5° 31s7 A (abc)
46-00​
WKLELEXINGTON, KY (PBS) -9211 SD 110° 4s10 A () 9214 SD 110° 4s10 A5155 HD 61.5° 31s7 A () 5155 HD 72.7° 6 A ()
46-00​
WKLELEXINGTON, KY (PBS) -5159 HD 61.5° 31s7 A 5169 HD 72.7° 6 A
56-00​
WDKYDANVILLE, KY (FOX) -9208 SD 110° 4s10 A ()5153 HD 61.5° 31s7 A (fox)
65-00​
WLJCBEATTYVILLE, KY -9212 SD 110° 4s10 A5158 HD 61.5° 31s7 A
67-00​
WUPXMOREHEAD, KY (ION) -9213 SD 110° 4s10 A5156 HD 61.5° 31s7 A
(Note: the chart is not updated yet to reflect today's removal of the CONUS channel 5155.)

Little Rock still has two duplicate channels of their PBS station (channels 5194 and 5199) on the same CONUS transponder:
Little Rock, AR
2-00​
KETSLITTLE ROCK, AR (PBS) -9359 SD 110° 18s15 A () 9360 SD 110° 18s15 A5194 HD 61.5° 31s14 A () 5194 HD 72.7° 6 A ()
2-00​
KETSLITTLE ROCK, AR (PBS) -5198 HD 61.5° 31s14 A 5199 HD 72.7° 6 A
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 3 views
Peter Parker
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
No idea what improvements might be involved.
16 Replies · 692 views
  • Like
Reactions: LQQK and reubenray
bookworm370
Has anyone noticed an FF stutter with 713? I used to be able to hit FF a few times and skip smoothly. After 713 (maybe 712), when I skip forward, there is a definite stutter for as many times as I have pressed FF.

Can anyone check on this and report back? Recorded programs and then press skip forward a few times to see if it's smooth? Normally, it just jumps to the right place after the skips.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
R
I got the 713 update yesterday.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
N
I'm getting fabulous picture on Ch. 148 4k, but zero audio with H713. This is with a recorded show (Notre Dame game). Anyone else have this? Audio is fine on every other channel.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
R
Has anyone noticed an FF stutter with 713? I used to be able to hit FF a few times and skip smoothly. After 713 (maybe 712), when I skip forward, there is a definite stutter for as many times as I have pressed FF.

Can anyone check on this and report back? Recorded programs and then press skip forward a few times to see if it's smooth? Normally, it just jumps to the right place after the skips.
My wife mentioned that her remote is acting strange this morning. She hit FF and it went to 15x FF.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Bobby
I'm getting fabulous picture on Ch. 148 4k, but zero audio with H713. This is with a recorded show (Notre Dame game). Anyone else have this? Audio is fine on every other channel.
This has been an ongoing issue. A fix is coming, probably in the next software version.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
T
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I have Dish Hopper and Hopper Plus and also have Alexa Echo. I link the Alex skill to Dish and it asks me to enter the pairing code shown on the TV. I go into Dish Settings and there is no Alexa shown. Not sure what to do.
16 Replies · 697 views
  • Like
Reactions: tanman
HipKat
Guys,
Android is Google. Google is Android. Android OS and Google TV are the same thing.
The Hopper+ and Joey 4's run Android TV, which is Google's television version of Android.
That means under the hood, you have:
  • Linux kernel
  • Android framework
  • Google TV / Android TV interface
  • Google Play Store for TV apps
Alexa is the competition. Google is not going to host their competition.
The old Hopper Carbon UI is NOT Google so that's why Alexa was on there.
H
Understood. But here's the rub - Google Assistant setup is ALSO missing from the Hopper Plus setup. I'm a paraplegic.and need to use voice controls as much as possible but I can't press a button on the remote to activate Google Assistant. I prefer ALEXA (or ALEXA+) but I have one older google device and will go that route IF they make it available. BTW calling Dish Customer Service is no help- they just say they have no info on if/when there will be an update.
navychop
Ungood.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
R
What is the purpose of connecting Alexa and the H3?
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
navychop
Tell Alexa verbally what to do.
K
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
Season 2 order already in hand:

'Star Trek: Starfleet Academy' Renewed for Season 2, Tatiana Maslany to Guest Star in Season 1

I've not been optimistic about this show based on what I've read so far. Seems to be aimed at a younger audience. Interesting though that Tatiana Maslany will have some sort of role.
79 Replies · 3137 views
K
I'm sure I will watch at least the first episode but I am not optimistic.
Foxbat
Paramount lost a number of the Star Trek creative crew to other projects, like Ron Moore going on to BSG and "For All Mankind". I see Denise and Michael Okuda are also involved with FAM.
K
I'm sure I will watch at least the first episode but I am not optimistic.
Here i am over a year later and just finished season 1. Not great but not as bad as I was expecting. Did not care for the barefoot captain stuff but overall ok. Actually looking forward to see what they did for season 2.
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
MikeD-C05
Here i am over a year later and just finished season 1. Not great but not as bad as I was expecting. Did not care for the barefoot captain stuff but overall ok. Actually looking forward to see what they did for season 2.
Yeah, the foot stuff was just nasty. I kept thinking of how dirty her feet would get traipsing around shoe-less. Funny, I love being shoe less at home and never wear shoes indoors in my home for long, but seeing her laying on all her furniture with her bare feet hanging out just kind of grossed me out.
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
harshness
I kept thinking of how dirty her feet would get traipsing around shoe-less.
Where would this "dirt" come from? Dead skin and dandruff?
MikeD-C05
Where would this "dirt" come from? Dead skin and dandruff?
There would still be dirt ,dust in the future I am sure. So walking around the station like she did she would get stuff on her feet. I am sure the robot vacuum is still going to miss stuff, with all those different alien species running around there.
meStevo
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
A continuation of a thread from the pub, just general discussion of AI.

Brief 60 minute clip about next gem autonomous fighters - not remote controlled, but rather collaborating with controllers and aircraft in the theater.


View: https://youtu.be/DRm0mbp_n1k


We've literally got a movie already about this ;)


View: https://youtu.be/a2PW7a9ViDc
64 Replies · 1092 views
meStevo
Agreed, it mostly regurgitates known solutions. That's the point. Nobody needs an innovative fix for a driver error or a creative way to format a report. Let it handle the solved problems so people can spend their time on the ones that aren't.
harshness
Agreed, it mostly regurgitates known solutions. That's the point.
That's the point at which innovation ends, and there's no longer any point to software engineering other than swatting bugs that result from misapplication.
meStevo
That's the point at which innovation ends, and there's no longer any point to software engineering other than swatting bugs that result from misapplication.

Addressed by what you didn't quote. This cycle is as old as computing: compilers, libraries, frameworks each automated the tedious part, and the human work moved up a level. Innovation didn't end; it shifted. And people still make new compilers, libraries or frameworks.

Nobody's forced to hand anything off. Anyone who wants to keep doing it by hand still can, and people who couldn't do it at all now can.
harshness
... and people who couldn't do it at all now can.
Misapplication isn't something that the casual coder can identify. They can only discover, the hard way, that it doesn't work at some point.
meStevo
Misapplication isn't something that the casual coder can identify. They can only discover, the hard way, that it doesn't work at some point.
You're not wrong, but that's part of learning. Whether from others or our own mistakes, we've all learned that lesson one way or another.
harshness
Whether from others or our own mistakes, we've all learned that lesson one way or another.
I'm not sure that the school of hard knocks is the quickest or surest education to find your way.

There are many examples in the headlines of people getting burned multiple times and not wavering in their pursuit of stupidity.
meStevo
I'm not sure that the school of hard knocks is the quickest or surest education to find your way.

Good thing not everyone will have to learn the hard way then. The same tools can explain why something broke.

There are many examples in the headlines of people getting burned multiple times and not wavering in their pursuit of stupidity.

This is true of literally anything, though.

Happy to agree to disagree, but I'm already enjoying the dividends personally and helping others at work and at home do the same.
  • Like
Reactions: telstar_1
harshness
This is true of literally anything, though.
Do you think that means we ought to be supporting it as the long-term solution?
Foxbat
​
Foxbat
Oops.
dishstaller
Been reading this thread but not commenting much, primarily because there is so much "news" out there on this topic and it is hard to tell what is real and what is theater.
My biggest problem with AI is that these agents are taught...not necessarily programmed but taught. Well, there's an old saying "garbage in/garbage out". I remember a Joe Rogan show a while back when he had Elon Musk on and they talked about AI and Elon said one of the AIs (can't remember which one, sorry) was asked which was worse, Thermonuclear War or mis-gendering Kaitlyn Jenner and it came back with the answer that mis-gendering was worse. Now forget the politics involved with all the gender stuff we have been subjected to the past few years.....to say that mis-gendering is worse than the killing of hundreds of millions, perhaps billions of human beings.....Kaitlyn Jenner included.....is simply insane not to mention incredibly dangerous.
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68523 Replies · 2672248 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
FTA4PA
Down On The Corner - Creedence Clearwater Revival
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
dishstaller
Mississippi Squirrel Revival - Ray Stevens
  • Love
Reactions: FTA4PA
Bobby
Mississippi Cotton Picking Delta Town - Charley Pride
harshness
Delta Dawn - Tanya Tucker
dishstaller
Can't You See - Marshall Tucker Band
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Stumbled across this ... http://www.gaspricewatch.com/USGas_ZipSearch.asp
I found no local prices, although it did show stations at my location...
Added these to this post...
USA National Gas Temperature Map
State By State Gasoline Taxes
Gas Buddy

Ethanol Free Stations

5549 Replies · 460508 views
WhiteBeard
Today.
1792023537020.webp
  • Haha
Reactions: meStevo
Bobby
Regular$6.099​
Premium$6.599​
Diesel$7.999​
at Costco, Rohnert Park.​
Bobby
Regular$5.999​
Premium$6.399​
Diesel$7.999​
at Costco, Rohnert Park.​
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
harshness
I wonder if California is getting into the Winter formula.
dishstaller
Regular$5.999​
Premium$6.399​
Odd that out there, Prem is only 40 cents higher. Here it's a full dollar more.

Last night it was about $4.17 gas, $6,19 diesel.