As if the market was flooded with desirable 3D titles.
Most of the best movies of the last 12 years are best experienced in 3D.
Absent support for Dolby Vision and up-to-date HDMI and HDCP specifications, there's some serious trade-offs.
Dolby Vision is a placebo. The improvement over HDR10 is barely noticeable and in a double blind test even most videophiles wouldn't even be able to tell the difference. It sure as hell isn't worth giving up stereoscopic 3D support for.
The public doesn't seem to agree. This also exacerbates viewing angle issues with its IPS display.
Normies sit around on badly placed furniture watching their televisions mounted up too high on the wall with the crappy built in speakers and constant distractions going on all around them. What's your point? For those who want a proper setup with seating positions at an optimal viewing distance and directly centered in front of the screen you can't beat the curve.
Most better TVs today do that at 120Hz.
Again, who cares? I have a 240Hz monitor and while there is *some* improvement going from 60 to 120 FPS, it is not nearly as drastic as 30 to 60 FPS. It's worth sacrificing 120 FPS for stereoscopic 3D.
If you're going to play games in pancake mode then you should be playing PC games on the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 monitor anyway -- the 32:9 aspect ratio combined with up to 2,000 nits of brightness in HDR mode easily makes it the best display for PC gaming ever made.
One should never employ the term "in its era" when touting something as timeless.
Nope, because "in its era," TVs had terrible input latency. This display was different and unique for its era because it had very low input latency. Many of these manufacturers' TVs have since improved on the input latency front, but it's still better than a lot of TVs currently on the market.
Whether it was 3D glasses or the lack of compelling content, an overwhelming majority of the buying public clearly decided that the trade-offs weren't worth it.
That's a false narrative too. 3D was rather well adopted in the early 2010's before 4K came along and the display manufacturers conspired with Hollywood studios to kill off 3D in the home. Display manufacturers wanted to shill higher resolutions and HDR and Hollywood studios wanted an exclusive tech you could only get by going to theaters. Anyone with a nice 3D capable TV had no reason to shell out for a movie ticket when they could watch the 3D Blu-ray instead, and Hollywood did not like that.
Other than 3D and being curved (of arguable value), a modern QLED or OLED TV perhaps surpasses in most popular respects.
MP3s are more popular than FLAC, DVDs and bitrate starved HD streaming is more popular than Blu-ray, sh!tty bitrate starved re-encoded a billion times MPEG-2 cable TV channels are more popular than backhauls and the H.264 master feeds on C-band. iTunes is more popular than HDtracks, and McDonald's is more popular than Culver's. WWE is the top rated TV show and "90 Day Fiance" pulls better ratings than scripted TV shows. Bitcoin is more popular than Monero and bastardized "American style" hard shell tacos are more popular than authentic street tacos. The Switch is the most popular console right now.
I couldn't give a damn about what's most popular. What's most popular is usually sh*t.