Social Feed

Antenna Man
Last reply · posted in Antenna Man
33 Replies · 5186 views
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA and navychop
harshness
Rare implies that the TV is unique and worth chasing after. That will likely never, ever be the case with a Samsung consumer level TV as there are cheap modern TVs that are just soooo much better.
V
Rare implies that the TV is unique and worth chasing after. That will likely never, ever be the case with a Samsung consumer level TV as there are cheap modern TVs that are just soooo much better.

False.

Samsung's 2015 JS9500 series is still the ultimate TV, because it has

-Stereoscopic 3D support at up to 4K resolution. I still watch 3D Blu-ray remuxes and play PC games in 4K 3D on it to this day.
-HDR support and the brightness to back it up with its FALD lighting instead of being edge-lit like most of the garbage TVs that came out in that era. It still keeps up with the brightness levels of most modern TV models except the most high-end models you don't see for sale in Walmart
-Curved screen is more immersive than flat. The curve is a fantastic feature to have in a TV when you have a proper set up with properly set up furniture that is directly centered in front of the TV.
-Handles RGB 4:4:4 4K @ 60 Hz input fine
-10-bit panel
-Game Mode that works well and delivers some of the lowest latency of any TV model produced in its era

The model is now 7 years old and I have zero desire whatsoever to upgrade to a new display that lacks 3D technology. There are far too many movies and video games out there that look absolutely amazing in 3D. I can't imagine watching something like Avatar, Gravity, or the MCU in pancake mode. These newer TVs that don't have 3D support are absolutely ridiculous. It's crazy to me that new TV models are actually downgrades over models that came out 7 years ago.
harshness
Samsung's 2015 JS9500 series is still the ultimate TV, because it has
The JS9500 is clearly a prosumer model. The MSRP for a 65" model was around $5,000!
-Stereoscopic 3D support at up to 4K resolution. I still watch 3D Blu-ray remuxes and play PC games in 4K 3D on it to this day.
As if the market was flooded with desirable 3D titles.
-HDR support and the brightness to back it up with its FALD lighting instead of being edge-lit like most of the garbage TVs that came out in that era. It still keeps up with the brightness levels of most modern TV models except the most high-end models you don't see for sale in Walmart
Absent support for Dolby Vision and up-to-date HDMI and HDCP specifications, there's some serious trade-offs.
-Curved screen is more immersive than flat. The curve is a fantastic feature to have in a TV when you have a proper set up with properly set up furniture that is directly centered in front of the TV.
The public doesn't seem to agree. This also exacerbates viewing angle issues with its IPS display.
-Handles RGB 4:4:4 4K @ 60 Hz input fine
-10-bit panel
Most better TVs today do that at 120Hz.
-Game Mode that works well and delivers some of the lowest latency of any TV model produced in its era
One should never employ the term "in its era" when touting something as timeless.
The model is now 7 years old and I have zero desire whatsoever to upgrade to a new display that lacks 3D technology. There are far too many movies and video games out there that look absolutely amazing in 3D. I can't imagine watching something like Avatar, Gravity, or the MCU in pancake mode. These newer TVs that don't have 3D support are absolutely ridiculous.
Whether it was 3D glasses or the lack of compelling content, an overwhelming majority of the buying public clearly decided that the trade-offs weren't worth it.
It's crazy to me that new TV models are actually downgrades over models that came out 7 years ago.
Other than 3D and being curved (of arguable value), a modern QLED or OLED TV perhaps surpasses in most popular respects.

If Samsung had delivered on their Evolution Kits and not decided to be hardnosed about Dolby Vision, the story would be a little happier but they didn't.
V
As if the market was flooded with desirable 3D titles.

Most of the best movies of the last 12 years are best experienced in 3D.

Absent support for Dolby Vision and up-to-date HDMI and HDCP specifications, there's some serious trade-offs.

Dolby Vision is a placebo. The improvement over HDR10 is barely noticeable and in a double blind test even most videophiles wouldn't even be able to tell the difference. It sure as hell isn't worth giving up stereoscopic 3D support for.

The public doesn't seem to agree. This also exacerbates viewing angle issues with its IPS display.

Normies sit around on badly placed furniture watching their televisions mounted up too high on the wall with the crappy built in speakers and constant distractions going on all around them. What's your point? For those who want a proper setup with seating positions at an optimal viewing distance and directly centered in front of the screen you can't beat the curve.

Most better TVs today do that at 120Hz.

Again, who cares? I have a 240Hz monitor and while there is *some* improvement going from 60 to 120 FPS, it is not nearly as drastic as 30 to 60 FPS. It's worth sacrificing 120 FPS for stereoscopic 3D.

If you're going to play games in pancake mode then you should be playing PC games on the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 monitor anyway -- the 32:9 aspect ratio combined with up to 2,000 nits of brightness in HDR mode easily makes it the best display for PC gaming ever made.

One should never employ the term "in its era" when touting something as timeless.

Nope, because "in its era," TVs had terrible input latency. This display was different and unique for its era because it had very low input latency. Many of these manufacturers' TVs have since improved on the input latency front, but it's still better than a lot of TVs currently on the market.

Whether it was 3D glasses or the lack of compelling content, an overwhelming majority of the buying public clearly decided that the trade-offs weren't worth it.

That's a false narrative too. 3D was rather well adopted in the early 2010's before 4K came along and the display manufacturers conspired with Hollywood studios to kill off 3D in the home. Display manufacturers wanted to shill higher resolutions and HDR and Hollywood studios wanted an exclusive tech you could only get by going to theaters. Anyone with a nice 3D capable TV had no reason to shell out for a movie ticket when they could watch the 3D Blu-ray instead, and Hollywood did not like that.

Other than 3D and being curved (of arguable value), a modern QLED or OLED TV perhaps surpasses in most popular respects.

MP3s are more popular than FLAC, DVDs and bitrate starved HD streaming is more popular than Blu-ray, sh!tty bitrate starved re-encoded a billion times MPEG-2 cable TV channels are more popular than backhauls and the H.264 master feeds on C-band. iTunes is more popular than HDtracks, and McDonald's is more popular than Culver's. WWE is the top rated TV show and "90 Day Fiance" pulls better ratings than scripted TV shows. Bitcoin is more popular than Monero and bastardized "American style" hard shell tacos are more popular than authentic street tacos. The Switch is the most popular console right now.

I couldn't give a damn about what's most popular. What's most popular is usually sh*t.
harshness
Most of the best movies of the last 12 years are best experienced in 3D.
Clearly availability isn't related to goodness. According to Empire magazine, all but three of the twenty best 3D movies of all time were released more than 12 years ago. The most recent to appear in the Top 20 was Spiderman: Into the Spiderverse (2018). Over half of the Top 20 were animated. Three of the movies were from the mid-1950s.
Dolby Vision is a placebo.
You could even more easily say that 3D is a placebo given how little of the best 3D movies were "filmed" in 3D (as opposed to rendered or synthesized).
The improvement over HDR10 is barely noticeable and in a double blind test even most videophiles wouldn't even be able to tell the difference.
This is clearly made up.
For those who want a proper setup with seating positions at an optimal viewing distance and directly centered in front of the screen you can't beat the curve.
How many theater seats fit in the "sweet spot" of a 65" curved IPS TV?
Nope, because "in its era," TVs had terrible input latency.
Yep, because we're no longer "in its era". You're promoting your candidate a whole generation later. rtings gives the JS9500 an 8.0 overall score.
That's a false narrative too. 3D was rather well adopted in the early 2010's before 4K came along and the display manufacturers conspired with Hollywood studios to kill off 3D in the home.
And here we are several years later and many of the 3D movies don't make it to home video as 3D.
I couldn't give a damn about what's most popular.
A case has been made that you don't care about what's good -- just as long as it is 3D.
  • Like
Reactions: primestar31
V
Clearly availability isn't related to goodness. According to Empire magazine, all but three of the twenty best 3D movies of all time were released more than 12 years ago. The most recent to appear in the Top 20 was Spiderman: Into the Spiderverse (2018). Over half of the Top 20 were animated. Three of the movies were from the mid-1950s.

I don't care about the opinions of some boomer magazine. Why are britbongs judging something produced by a different country anyway? Like they're the movie experts. Might as well have Canadians judging the best tacos.

42 out of the 50 highest-grossing films of all time are available in, and greatly enhanced by, 3D. Including the #1 movie, of which the 3D was the primary draw. Why would I want to watch Avatar flat?


Buying a TV that can't properly display the best version of 42 out of the biggest 50 films of the 21st century is a non-starter.

You could even more easily say that 3D is a placebo given how little of the best 3D movies were "filmed" in 3D (as opposed to rendered or synthesized).
It's called post-production. Most of what you see in the final product isn't "filmed." This is a ridiculous argument.

CG is a placebo given how little of the best CG movies were "filmed" in CG.

How many theater seats fit in the "sweet spot" of a 65" curved IPS TV?

Who cares? Who has a theater in their house? Why would I want 50 strangers coming over to my house to watch a movie?

And here we are several years later and many of the 3D movies don't make it to home video as 3D.

A case has been made that you don't care about what's good -- just as long as it is 3D.

It's already been established that the normie cattle are woefully ignorant of how much better their movies could be if they were to see them in 3D. Popularity != quality. I made my point so comprehensively with my examples I see you flat out ignored them with your retort, indicating that the argument was so strong you knew you had nothing to refute it. We don't need to retread this ground again.
harshness
I don't care about the opinions of some boomer magazine. Why are britbongs judging something produced by a different country anyway? Like they're the movie experts. Might as well have Canadians judging the best tacos.
You seem to be quite the bigot. Anyone that doesn't use a 3D TV to watch all their movies in 3D is a "normie" and people from other countries can't handle arithmetic.
42 out of the 50 highest-grossing films of all time are available in, and greatly enhanced by, 3D. Including the #1 movie, of which the 3D was the primary draw.
Primarily because most of the population never had a 3D TV and if they saw a 3D film, it was in a theater where people weren't huddled in front of a mid-size television. I enjoyed most of Avatar but the only movie I've ever seen in 3D is Captain EO (and it wasn't "all that" for me).

It seems pretty likely that Top Gun: Maverick is likely to breeze past Avatar so I wonder how you precious JS9500 does with IMAX format.
As if IMDB is the be-all and end-all of ratings or collecting of box office receipts numbers and certainly doesn't contemplate what percentage of the population has or continues to view those films in 3D versus "flat".
Buying a TV that can't properly display the best version of 42 out of the biggest 50 films of the 21st century is a non-starter.
For you it probably is but for the rest of the population, they don't seem to give a tinker's dam. Clearly 3D isn't the make or break attribute that you insist that it must be.
It's called post-production. Most of what you see in the final product isn't "filmed." This is a ridiculous argument.
Labeling things seems to be your shtick. It doesn't make your arguments any more credible.
CG is a placebo given how little of the best CG movies were "filmed" in CG.
It certainly doesn't contribute to the "physics" of the movie in the overall "suspension of disbelief" if the effects are gone overboard to pop out of the screen.
Who cares? Who has a theater in their house?
A viewing party of three or larger could be a problem for such a TV. Of course if you have bunk beds stacked in front of the TV, it might be easier. Perhaps your household is relatively small so the sweet spot isn't a problem.
It's already been established that the normie cattle are woefully ignorant of how much better their movies could be if they were to see them in 3D.
If they're uncomfortable wearing 3D glasses, is it really better? While a non-HDR/WCG TV can do about 34% of the visible palette, the JS9500 hits just 54%. Do you insist that the color reproduction isn't important? Perhaps that's why there are so many animated films in the 3D list.
Popularity != quality.
I submit that there's another important inequality: 3D < must have.
navychop
I seem to recall a bit about UHD potentially enabling much better 3D, even without glasses. No more headaches.

But it seems the bloom was off the rose for 3D by then and there was no business case to pursue that technology.

FWIW, I wish my Sony 900 supported 3D, even though I have little interest in 3D. I'd have at least given it a try at home. Poor experience in the theatre- bad seating.

And now we'll never see the Ronco Holosuite.
D
A couple years ago, CHCH-TV in Hamilton Ontario tested a 1080p MPEG4 sub channel.
It only showed a test pattern.

Out of my 5 TVs, only Samsung would scan in the channel.
Not LG or Panasonic.
harshness
Out of my 5 TVs, only Samsung would scan in the channel.
Not LG or Panasonic.
It typically comes down to when the TV was manufactured. If it was built before 2008-9, there's not a great chance and even if the hardware could handle AVC, the firmware may not.
JSheridan
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I know HipKat said that they were working on conversions but we got the official news yesterday right from Dish that starting next month all DMA's will be on the western arc, and all customers will be assigned to that. That's gonna mean a lot of customers around here aren't gonna get Dish unless there are exceptions. Too many mountains and trees.
164 Replies · 4572 views
MikeD-C05
I don't know why DISH doesn't just start a streaming version of DISH and then if you can't see the western arc you go with streaming versions and then they could keep customers if they had good internet speeds. I mean Sling TV could be changed to Streaming DISH TV if they wanted since both companies are under Echostar. Then you would still be able to use your ota antenna with Air TV devices like I do with Air TV Anywhere with 4 ota tuners.
Scott Greczkowski
I don't know why DISH doesn't just start a streaming version of DISH
I have the same wish.
S
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Jimbo
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Mister B
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
S
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
can't forget the little blue m&m's
charlesrshell
can't forget the little blue m&m's
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
B
I have the same wish.
Why?
A lot of people do not have fast internet.
That is why they use satellite
S
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
i wouldn't know :) ;)
  • Haha
Reactions: charlesrshell
osu1991
Why?
A lot of people do not have fast internet.
That is why they use satellite
Doesn't mean that satellite would have to go away. Dish is already in the game with Sling which needs a good overhaul
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
JSheridan
Dish Anywhere has gotten a lot better but still has no Pause/Play/Skip Trick Play controls on the national channels that stream from Dish and that don't come from you Hopper. DirecTV Stream doesn't have that limitation.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Scott Greczkowski
Why?
A lot of people do not have fast internet.
That is why they use satellite
They keep the satellite service too. But have. Full streaming version of dish. As sling tv sucks eggs.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
TheForce
Supporting Founder Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Phone & Tablet Zone
Apple Fall Hardware Event takes place today, September 9, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. PT / 1:00 p.m. ET. It marks the debut of new CEO John Ternus and the expected reveal of Apple's first foldable phone.
133 Replies · 1525 views
comfortably_numb
Can't remember if I've posted this yet..


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfL5seXJyWU
  • Haha
Reactions: slow_poke_pete
Foxbat
If you ponied up for an iPhone Duo, keep it away from anything other than your soft, fleshy fingertips. No fingernails, no dust, sand, dirt, or other particulate matter. And don't bend it more than it needs to. Zack has destroyed $2,000 of Apple hardware to get those views, which should cover his expenses.
​
  • Like
Reactions: comfortably_numb
comfortably_numb
No fingernails, no dust, sand, dirt, or other particulate matter

And definitely no medieval chain armor!
  • Haha
Reactions: Foxbat
harshness
medieval chain armor
Aka "mail" or "maille".
Foxbat
IFixIt has published their Teardown and they had some positive things to say about the iPhone Duo. It still showed some dust ingress into the hinge assembly but seemed otherwise well-sealed.
​

But with a considerable number of reports of the main screen dying with similar failures, AppleCare+ should be a no-brainer for this phone.
S

most carriers do. that's why they send updates that slow phones down!! i buy unlocked phones no effect to me
S
IFixIt has published their Teardown and they had some positive things to say about the iPhone Duo. It still showed some dust ingress into the hinge assembly but seemed otherwise well-sealed.
​

But with a considerable number of reports of the main screen dying with similar failures, AppleCare+ should be a no-brainer for this phone.

hope you have apple care a screen job is 1000.00 :oops:. can we say over priced garbage!!!
V
Last reply · posted in DIRECTV General Forum
I'm thinking of switching to DirecTV and wanted to know what equipment I should be asking for.

I'm wanting wired satellite due to that fact that I live in the sticks and there is no reliable, decent speed internet for streaming available.

What would be the correct equipment for three 4K tvs in the house?
59 Replies · 1053 views
navychop
I'm having trouble with the posit that StarLink is not available. You do not appear to be in an oversubscribed area

Why do you think you can't get StarLink?
V
I'm having trouble with the posit that StarLink is not available. You do not appear to be in an oversubscribed area

Why do you think you can't get StarLink?
I never said that Starlink is not available. The Starlink app shows obstructions for every category, so I have not researched it further.
S
I never said that Starlink is not available. The Starlink app shows obstructions for every category, so I have not researched it further.
The HR-54 is the hardwired genie 5 tuners 1TB HDD the HS--17 the 7 tuner 2TB hdd is only a wireless setup now. dtv csr's are crap also
Tom Speer
The HR-54 is the hardwired genie 5 tuners 1TB HDD the HS--17 the 7 tuner 2TB hdd is only a wireless setup now. dtv csr's are crap also

If they are requiring all clients on a new HS17 install to be wireless, that is not a technical requirement. It saves their techs from having to pull coax all over the house. It makes installations cheaper.
Jimbo
The DirecTV order entry work flow doesn't allow wired clients with an HS17. Does that clear it up for you?
Yet the C61k (4k unit) was wired only ?
That was the only unit available for the HS17 if you wanted 4K

How does that work ?

Or do I havwe that flip flopped ?
It's been awhile for me now.
S
Yet the C61k (4k unit) was wired only ?
That was the only unit available for the HS17 if you wanted 4K

How does that work ?

Or do I havwe that flip flopped ?
It's been awhile for me now.
the hs 17 only gets the wireless geminis no more hardwiring.. i think dtv is trying to ween people offf of the teat satellite
JSheridan
the hs 17 only gets the wireless geminis no more hardwiring.. i think dtv is trying to ween people offf of the teat satellite
I think Dish might be the only service that still wires houses. The cable company has gone wireless, Verizon is switching all their copper line customers to wireless, DirecTV Stream, even most surveillance and alarm systems are going wireless.
S
I think Dish might be the only service that still wires houses. The cable company has gone wireless, Verizon is switching all their copper line customers to wireless, DirecTV Stream, even most surveillance and alarm systems are going wireless.
our hopper and joey 4's are all hard wired
b4pjoe
our hopper and joey 4's are all hard wired
So is my 2 Gemini's and my 4 HR24's.
JSheridan
So is my 2 Gemini's and my 4 HR24's.
And I'm guessing they've been that way for quite a while. The future of DirecTV is no wires. Actually, the future of DirecTV is probably a merger with Dish, and IMHO if Charlie is smart he'll use the DirecTV brand.
  • Like
Reactions: slow_poke_pete
S
And I'm guessing they've been that way for quite a while. The future of DirecTV is no wires. Actually, the future of DirecTV is probably a merger with Dish, and IMHO if Charlie is smart he'll use the DirecTV brand.
why not just do a rebranding of the two :what
JSheridan
why not just do a rebranding of the two :what
As they pivot away from using dishes and more toward streaming, the DirecTV brand would make much more sense.
b4pjoe
And I'm guessing they've been that way for quite a while. The future of DirecTV is no wires. Actually, the future of DirecTV is probably a merger with Dish, and IMHO if Charlie is smart he'll use the DirecTV brand.
Yes mine was wired years ago. However you can still order satellite service with wired receivers on the DIRECTV website. I guess you cannot if you call to order the service.
Jimbo
I would take an HR54 over a HS17 ANY day of the week ... The HR54 Looks like a recvr, works in your set up fine ...
The HS17 is a large triangle that looks stupid in your equipment, often they try to Hie in behind something ... just a poor design over all.

If you got an HS17 they Forced you to give up you Stand alone Recvrs ... just a poor idea ...
I had my HR54 to the end, along with my HR24's ...

At least I could still enjoy D* when traveling in the Motor home when I kept the HR54 set up at home, as well as at the lake.
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony
Nominal
I would take an HR54 over a HS17 ANY day of the week ... The HR54 Looks like a recvr, works inn tour set up fine ...
The HS17 is a large triangle that looks stupid in your equipment, often they try to Hie in behind something ... just a poor design over all.
It's not a poor design when you factor in that it has a Wireless Video Bridge built-in. It's shaped like a router or gateway for a reason.
JSheridan
Yes mine was wired years ago. However you can still order satellite service with wired receivers on the DIRECTV website. I guess you cannot if you call to order the service.
We're a DirecTV retailer and there is no where in the order entry flow to have wired clients with an HS17. I heard that when it's ordered on the website the installer shows up with only HS17's and wireless clients. I don't know how reliable that info is as it came from a dubious source but it makes sense.
b4pjoe
We're a DirecTV retailer and there is no where in the order entry flow to have wired clients with an HS17. I heard that when it's ordered on the website the installer shows up with only HS17's and wireless clients. I don't know how reliable that info is as it came from a dubious source but it makes sense.
Yeah that would not surprise me but they do have the option on the website for wired installs. I would guess when they show up with wireless clients most people won't object. I would but a lot of people probably would not.
  • Like
Reactions: JSheridan
S
It's not a poor design when you factor in that it has a Wireless Video Bridge built-in. It's shaped like a router or gateway for a reason.
i do agree with jimbo on wanting to hide the HS-17 :biggrin been there ;):coco
S
As they pivot away from using dishes and more toward streaming, the DirecTV brand would make much more sense.
agree to a certain point!!! is charlies pockets gonna get tight and will he cancel channels because he don't want to pay for them??? a hopper 3 on dtv channel lineup would be amazing and every mans dream come true lol :what ;)
R
I would take an HR54 over a HS17 ANY day of the week ... The HR54 Looks like a recvr, works in your set up fine ...
The HS17 is a large triangle that looks stupid in your equipment, often they try to Hie in behind something ... just a poor design over all.

If you got an HS17 they Forced you to give up you Stand alone Recvrs ... just a poor idea ...
I had my HR54 to the end, along with my HR24's ...

At least I could still enjoy D* when traveling in the Motor home when I kept the HR54 set up at home, as well as at the lake.
Well, different strokes and all that. I've had that HS17 sitting quietly doing its job for almost a decade. As I mentioned earlier, at one point I had two wired and two wireless receivers. Now, just one C61K.

Even before that I had a HR44 with an HR24 and two wireless minis. Back then, which was years ago, I would have agreed with the need for individual receivers, but at this point, I stream almost everything, including shows I used to record.

It'll be moot soon enough anyway. Wired receivers/DVRs are going the way of the POTS landline. You can't stop progress.
  • Like
Reactions: Jimbo
S
If they are requiring all clients on a new HS17 install to be wireless, that is not a technical requirement. It saves their techs from having to pull coax all over the house. It makes installations cheaper.
they still won't do it if there's coax from dish in the home!!
Comptech
Last reply · posted in SiriusXM Satellite Radio
Squirrels have eaten my antenna wire on my home unit that is a car radio running of the 12 volt side of my solar system. I need a new antenna and would like to add something to one of my existing masts. The reason I am looking at this that I am also covered in trees which has not been a problem, but something mast mounted would future proof me. Thanks in advance.
7 Replies · 167 views
  • Wow
Reactions: comfortably_numb
cp2k
The Pixel Radio Pro-500 and Pro-600 are the best home antennas for that type of setup. I sent you a PM, as I actually have one I was planning to list in the Classifieds when this heat wave subsides in the South.
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Simmons
comfortably_numb
squirrel GIF
A
The Pixel Radio Pro-500 and Pro-600 are the best home antennas for that type of setup. I sent you a PM, as I actually have one I was planning to list in the Classifieds when this heat wave subsides in the South.
We have the pro-500 and it's a beast pulling in the signal!!! always full bars no matter how much it rains. it's worth every penny ;) :) :)
Comptech
squirrel GIF
I am a animal lover, but this year I gave up gardening. Even moved it to potted plants on the second story deck last year. Can't tell you how much use my Ruger 10-22 got, but it was a losing battle for me. Never got any food. So now they eat coax instead! 20 acres of dense woods behind me and my stuff tastes better, either veggies or wires!
Comptech
Last year they ate through my times microwave LMR400 for my CB! had to cut it back and put male and female connectors on it. So much for having a pristine run of LMR400.
  • Like
Reactions: Arctic_fox
A
i might think about running cables through some conduit to prevent the Squirrels from chewing em all to hell ;)
S
these are good for travel
71AF4wzgZOL._AC_SL1500_.webp
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
3 Replies · 31 views
Bobby
Rest in peace. Together again with Spock, Doc, Uhura, and Scotty...
long_time_Dish
Rest in peace, Checkov, and Bester too...
  • Like
Reactions: Keith Brannen
FTA4PA
Rest In Peace 😢
Ramy
Supporting Founder
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
Really excited for this season with Kentucky having a new coach and some really exciting recruits. Probably won't last long, but here's hoping this season is great.
161 Replies · 2297 views
  • Haha
Reactions: Mike0616
Y
The playoff told us rankings are pointless. Lesser ranked teams were winning playoff games. Ranking the top 24? Rank it the same way as normal. It'll consist of at least four or five of each cartel's teams, other conference winners. The field will be fine, the sorting will be problematic and arbitrary, but in the end does it matter?

It'll matter when OSU or Alabama have to face a decent upstart squad due to being ranked midway in the listing, or goodness help us, each other. But thanks to arbitrary rankings, that should be easily avoided by design. Then the cartels will need to fix the rankings a bit so the top dogs can have a bye or three to help prevent those untimely eliminations from the playoff.
  • Like
Reactions: AZ.
osu1991
For better or worse, NIL and the transfer portal have evened the field. NCAA will be pretty much like the NFL with records being kind of meaningless and anyone can make a run and win it all.
Jimbo
The playoff told us rankings are pointless. Lesser ranked teams were winning playoff games. Ranking the top 24? Rank it the same way as normal. It'll consist of at least four or five of each cartel's teams, other conference winners. The field will be fine, the sorting will be problematic and arbitrary, but in the end does it matter?

It'll matter when OSU or Alabama have to face a decent upstart squad due to being ranked midway in the listing, or goodness help us, each other. But thanks to arbitrary rankings, that should be easily avoided by design. Then the cartels will need to fix the rankings a bit so the top dogs can have a bye or three to help prevent those untimely eliminations from the playoff.
As for meeting each other, you say they automatically avoid ... not really, if I recall, when Ohio State won in 2 years ago, they had the toughest route to win it all .... they played Tennessee, then it was the #1 team Oregon, in round 2 then Texas in round 3 then Notre Dame in the Finals .... thats hardly avoiding the tough match ups.

Personally, I don't want to see 42- 10 blowouts in the first 2 rounds ....

Not sure where you found lesser teams beating higher ranked teams ... (outside of the Top teams, which any could beat each other (1-8).

Which in my opinion is where the Playoffs should be teams 1-8 .
Team number 64 has ZERO chance to win 4-5 games against top teams.

Btw, whens the last time a (in basketball) 32-64 ranked team WON it all, or even got to the Final 2 ?????

I'll wait.
Y
You mean other than Miami being in the final last year... and Indiana being the only bye team to win a game?
Ronnie-
I see alot saying nobody is good because several have a loss or two. I disagree. I think more teams are good now, and even.

Its made for some more competitive games imo.
Ronnie-
For better or worse, NIL and the transfer portal have evened the field. NCAA will be pretty much like the NFL with records being kind of meaningless and anyone can make a run and win it all.
The NIL and tranfer portal definitely need some work, or guidelines, but it has evened stuff out somewhat.

Even the expanded playoff. While it does make a single regular season game less relevant in the overall picture, its added a different level of interest imo. Losing a game, or two even, doesnt mean your season is over. The teams still have ALOT to play for.

I am not as against this (as a whole that still needs tweaking) as I thought I would be. More competitive football, I think that is a good thing.
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68619 Replies · 2678230 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
Long Hot Summer - Keith Urban
gms49ers
Long Cool Woman (In a Black Dress) - The Hollies
sdfntx
Cool Jerk - The Mindbenders
dishstaller
Cool Change - Little River Band
long_time_Dish
Change Of The Guard - Steely Dan
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in What's Cooking?
We have a Breakfast and Dinner thread so... :)
Continuing from the Breakfast thread, found Cornbread mix so ...
Yellow Cornbread Mix
2 Hatch Green Chiles -diced
1 Egg
2/3 cup of milk
add to greased pan
Bake for 400f 20-25 minutes(From instructions)
now to put together and try... this to go with pinto beans...
5447 Replies · 335855 views
TRG
TRG
Two Chicago style hot dogs and a Fanta orange soda.
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby and dfergie
dfergie
Fanta orange soda.
Sitting in fridge cooling off, bought 1 along with 2 Mexican Cokes at La Tienda... (I keep a few cokes stashed as well as in fridge and camper fridge)
  • Like
Reactions: TRG and Mr Tony
M
Garlic cheese bread
Green beans
Apples
Chocolate Milk
Some weird noodles. ;)
(They have salad and a couple other fruits if wanted)
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
TRG
TRG
Club sandwich and corn chowder. Iced tea.
dfergie
Chili dog bowl, water… (homemade chili)
TRG
TRG
Leftover wanton soup and pork fried rice. Water.
Linus Tech Tips
· posted in Linus Tech Tips
0 Replies · 7 views