Social Feed

Stuart Sweet
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Solid Signal Blog
I was inspired to write this article by two things.

The first was a random factoid that caught my attention. Back in the early days of television, I Love Lucy would commonly score a 40 rating. What that means is that 40% of all the humans in the country, whether or not they even owned a TV, were watching that show as it aired live. And this was the run-of-the-mill rating, not like a special event or something. Today, it's very uncommon for any broadcast TV show to get more than a 3 rating. That's a huge difference.

The second was this article at CordCutters News. It confirms that trend by pointing out that even if you look at a network-by-network basis the numbers are just appalling. And that's what led to the headline of this article.

It's obvious why prime time doesn't rule anymore


In the 1950s, the average home got 3 – 5 channels of television and of course no internet. Your entertainment options were limited to: television, reading something, and talking to your family. Put yourself in the place of those folks and you'll see why television was so popular.

Today of course there are so many options, and one of those options is the ability to watch prime-time programming anytime on your own schedule. You can record programs or find them on streaming, that's your option.

And yet, it seems that year after year we see the broadcast networks merrily pushing more cop and doctor shows in prime time, and ratings keep dropping.

The real question is whether or not something can be done.


I think we all agree on some basic facts. The first is that if you grew up in the era of DVRs and the internet, you have no loyalty to broadcast television. If you grew up before that, you probably do. Broadcasters know this which is why a lot of broadcast TV advertisers is geared toward people over 50 now. Historically broadcast TV has always advertised to those 18-49, but that group just isn't watching live TV, period.

For about a dozen years in the early 21st century, broadcasters tried to entice younger viewers, with very little success. It seems like in recent years they've just sort of given up and tried to please the viewers they have. That's not a bad thing if you're one of those viewers (I am, so I'm fine with it.)

Here's why I care.


It's not just that broadcasters have given up on the young people. I honestly should be ok with that, because there should be something that caters to older folks like me. It's that local television is important. Local television has long been the place where you could find out things about your area that mattered. TV stations have been well-funded enough to have real, ethical investigative journalism. That's something we desperately need. Before TV, newspapers played that role and we let local newspapers die.

There is absolutely a place for the kind of reporting that is done by regular people who see things and record them on their phones. That's critical too, but that kind of reporting lacks context. All you're seeing is what the phone is pointing at and that may not really represent reality. You need trained journalists with ethics to help you understand what you see. Not that you should take their word for things either, but at least they try to help with perspective.

If no one is watching prime time, then they're probably not watching any local TV. And if no one's watching, those stations won't be able to afford to have news.

Can anything be done or is it too late?


I absolutely don't think it's too late. I think primetime programming can become more immediate and appealing. In the early 2000s, broadcasters were on the ropes and were rescued by reality competition shows like Survivor and American Idol. I don't know what would rescue them today but I do think a rescue is possible.

I don't think we'll ever get back to 40 ratings, but I think it's possible for local broadcasters to serve content that people want to see live. If I knew what that was, I'd make a mint selling the idea. All I can hope is that someone is working on the problem.

There is something you can do, though. Get an over-the-air TV antenna and see what's out there. You probably don't realize that there are dozens of channels you can get for free. Sometimes, it's just nice to sit down and watch. Put the remote and the phone out of reach and just enjoy. Maybe you'll find it will be worth it, and maybe you'll contribute to keeping local news going for another day.

The post Is prime-time TV dead? appeared first on The Solid Signal Blog.

Continue reading...
1 Replies · 420 views
Bruce
The problem with the younger group is they are now trained to watch everything via streaming, for example, my son is 33, he does watch certain CBS shows, like FBI, but he watches them on Paramount+, yes he could save money if he watched them on the antenna, but he also watches the exclusive Paramount shows, Star Trek for one, so why bother.

My daughter is 28, if it is not on You Tube or Netflix, she will not watch it.

Now myself, at the age of 56, I have a antenna, I have a Tablo, since I am retired again, I have lots of time, I do watch Broadcast Prime Time Shows, but I also watch them on the streaming services for the much better quality, 1080P ( some are in 4K) and Dolby Digital+ sound, they look and sound so much better then the antenna or Live TV Providers.

Millennials are lost to streaming, the majority will never watch TV the way I used to, then there is Gen Z, I doubt they even know what a antenna is.

Millennials and the oldest of Gen Z are having kids, Generation Alpha, streaming will be all they will know.
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in What's Cooking?
We have a Breakfast and Dinner thread so... :)
Continuing from the Breakfast thread, found Cornbread mix so ...
Yellow Cornbread Mix
2 Hatch Green Chiles -diced
1 Egg
2/3 cup of milk
add to greased pan
Bake for 400f 20-25 minutes(From instructions)
now to put together and try... this to go with pinto beans...
5448 Replies · 336076 views
M
Garlic cheese bread
Green beans
Apples
Chocolate Milk
Some weird noodles. ;)
(They have salad and a couple other fruits if wanted)
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
TRG
TRG
Club sandwich and corn chowder. Iced tea.
dfergie
Chili dog bowl, water… (homemade chili)
TRG
TRG
Leftover wanton soup and pork fried rice. Water.
dfergie
IMG_5955.webp

Sweet tea…
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68658 Replies · 2680216 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
I Wanna Talk About Me - Toby Keith
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
gms49ers
It's Easy - Boston
RaiderPower
Take It Easy On Me - Little River Band
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 46 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 284 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
2 Replies · 51 views
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

2 Replies · 55 views
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Jimbo
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

They will have to look at the switching sections to determine WHY 2 trains were on the same track ... at the same time.
dishstaller
Thought this article might be of interest to some of you who might travel via train.